Why are UK’s Conservatives embracing European conspiracy theories?

At its last party conference before an election it’s expected to lose, Britain’s ruling party is bringing fringe ideas into the mainstream.

ADVERTISEMENT

With an election due to be held within the next year, the British government is struggling desperately to win over public support – and with perhaps only months to go till it faces the electorate, its rhetoric is morphing into what looks like full-on populism.

Among the latest ideas the ruling Conservative Party’s MPs have floated are preventing a “tax on meat” (which the opposition has never proposed), and banning “15-minute neighbourhoods” which would supposedly allow local government to restrict people’s movements.

These are false claims that have been widely debunked, but they have lately gathered traction among fringe right-wing groups active on social media. And by European standards, the Conservative government is in fact a relative latecomer to these particular theories.

The concept of a 15-minute neighbourhood was first formulated in France in the mid-2010s, and adopted by Paris mayor Anne Hidalgo as her city began to re-emerge from the COVID pandemic.

As the idea spread to other world cities, it became the target of conspiracy theorists radicalised during the pandemic, who see it as the next wave of an insidious plot to make lockdowns permanent on the pretext of combating climate change.

This idea dovetails with other fringe theories about creeping totalitarianism in everyday life among them a wariness of the “cashless economy” and claims that a “globalist” elite is conspiring to ban meat consumption and force citizens to subsist on insects instead.

The insect theory has enjoyed a surge of interest in Lithuania, where public authorities have had to push back hard against it. It’s also caught on in Bulgaria, including with the help of a loudmouthed fringe politician – and a prominent Russian state TV host.

But these outlandish theories are not just the province of Russia-amenable far-right media and fringe grassroots protest movements: they also have their advocates in certain European governments.

Poland’s ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party, which is fighting to secure another term in a 15 October election, has actively propagated the insect-consumption story.

Earlier this year, several PiS politicians accused opposition leader Donald Tusk and his party of planning to deny Poles access to meat. One PiS lawmaker, Bartosz Kownacki,​​ declared that “Instead of chicken, eat a worm” because “this is their real election programme”. Tusk derided the claim as embarrassingly desperate.

Also subscribing to the insect theory is far-right Italian politician Matteo Salvini, whose party supports the current government in Rome.

While the Conservatives have not mentioned insects specifically, that they are raising the twin spectres of government control of meat consumption and limits on personal movement indicates that they have identified an audience potentially receptive to this sort of rhetoric.

So why now? According to Tim Bale, Professor of Politics at Queen Mary, University of London, the dire state of the party’s polling and its exhaustion after 13 years in power are both weighing heavy.

“The Conservatives know fully well that the fundamentals – the economy, the NHS, and even asylum and immigration – are running against them so they are basically throwing a whole bunch of ‘war-on-woke’ and ‘green crap’ stuff against the wall in the hope that some of it will stick. I’m not sure it’s that coordinated or coherent, more clutching at straws.”

Bale, whose book The Conservative Party After Brexit charts what has happened to the party in the last five years – which have seen it led by four different prime ministers – is unconvinced that the government’s sudden investment in outré paranoid ideas has much of an audience among the electorate.

“The Tories target voters are middle-aged to elderly, mainly white, mainly home-owning, car-driving, non-university graduates with culturally conservative views,” he explains. 

“They’re hoping that the ‘war-on-woke’ and ‘green crap’ stuff will mobilise them to turn out and vote and, even better, stem any losses to Labour which might result from the loss of their reputation for economic competence and the dire state of public services.

“It may also bring a few supporters of the radical right-wing populist party Reform UK back into the Tory fold. And who’s to say it might not work. The question is will it be enough – to which the answer is probably not, but what else have they got?”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Reform UK party that Bale mentions is the rebranded version of the Brexit Party, formerly led by Nigel Farage. The party has not won any electoral representation since the UK left the EU except for a tiny handful of local government seats. That in turn raises the question of how much the Conservatives have to gain from competing with it.

Yet when Farage, who has traded on the insect theory himself, arrived at this week’s Conservative conference in Manchester, he was all but mobbed by enthusiastic supporters. And The Spectator, the British press’s top establishment right-wing political magazine, recently named him the most powerful figure on the British right, ranking him above the sitting Tory prime minister.

Having stepped back from running for office himself, Farage’s main mouthpiece is his show on GB News, a right-wing news channel whose anchors include full-on conspiracy theorists and notorious provocateurs attacking “wokeness” in all its forms.

Meanwhile, as the Conservatives use their conference to vent more bizarre ideas than ever, Bale is not optimistic about the state of the party – or of British politics in general.

“It’s pretty depressing, really,” he says. “when you’ve got a government that’s reduced to telling people that, among other things, it’s going to make it easier for people to appeal against parking tickets, we’re not exactly in visionary territory, are we?”

Source link

#UKs #Conservatives #embracing #European #conspiracy #theories

Bugs for Dinner? Americans Still Resist the Best Meat Alternative We Have | Wealth of Geeks

Don’t worry. Bugs are just extra protein.” Chances are if you grew up in the United States, your mom or dad said this to you more than once when you complained about an insect contaminating your food or flying into your mouth.

And while Americans have an aversion to munching on a little exoskeleton, lots of people across the world do it on a daily basis. Even celebrities like Justin Timberlake and Angelina Jolie devour insects on a daily basis and teach their kids to do the same.

Insects are a sustainable healthy alternative to resource-intensive staples like beef, poultry, and fish. For a long time, The United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization has advocated for their inclusion in a regular diet. Yet, the product is still not widely used in the US, even with an established demand for meat substitutes.

Fortune Business projects that sales of insect proteins will increase from $189.32 million in 2022 to $856.08 million by 2029, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 24.1% throughout this forecast period. The United States market was the largest in North America for insect protein in 2020 and will expectedly maintain its lead until 2027.

Though it has a sizable end-user market, insect protein consumption in the United States is mostly for livestock feed.

Emphasizing the benefits of insect protein, Brian Chau, a food scientist who runs his own consulting firm, Chau Time, says that the nutritional benefits of entomophagy – eating bugs – are that they are complete sources of protein. Eating the whole insect results in 100% of the protein consumed to meet the complete amino acid count humans need compared to most plants, like pea protein, which requires a blend of other plant proteins to be a complete protein source.

Compared to meat products, Chau says insects have more protein per pound and contribute some calcium from their exoskeleton. He adds some insects are rich in vitamins and trace minerals like copper, selenium, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, and zinc.

“Their environmental benefits,” Chau says, “include reduction of carbon footprint for protein consumption.” According to a study by researchers at the University of Wageningen in the Netherlands, insects can reduce methane emissions by as much as 80% compared to cows.

Early Start Up in the Industry

All Things Bugs, founded by Dr. Aaron T. Dossey, is a pioneer in this industry, founded in 2011. The startup creates environmentally friendly, sustainable technology using insects to increase food security and health. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation first provided funding to the business in 2012 to assist in the production of therapeutic food (RUTF) for malnourished children.

The company has since received over $5 million in USDA and military (DARPA) research money. Early USDA funding was used to develop and commercialize the firm’s patented Griopro® cricket powder production method. The firm became the world’s first supplier of insect-based food ingredients.

The company’s other USDA and DARPA-funded projects have been used to develop additional processing methods (such as protein and oil extraction), food product development, genetic engineering, automated farming, and feed formulation technologies.

Dossey says he’s still engaged in several projects for research and development of insects as a sustainable bioresource and just about everything involving insects besides killing them. He recently published the first textbook in this field — Insects As Sustainable Food Ingredients.

However, Dossey admits there’s only so much he can do without funding that’s not earmarked for research. “Based on how much it costs to build facilities and commercialize products, I have no money,” he says, “so beyond putting cricket powder on the market, which I have done, there’s nothing more I can do.”

Nonetheless, despite the company’s turbulent business history, Dossey is still committed to making the world a better place by providing more sustainable protein options. Without the resources for a large-scale commercial launch, he plans to reintroduce his cricket powder sometime this month. His current research projects involve creating automation and mealworm farming technologies as well as a cricket-based breakfast cereal product.

Industry Challenge

Dossey hints that more Americans may be receptive to accepting insect protein if money is spent on visibility. “People only believe what they see. Americans don’t have access and exposure to these alternative protein sources,” he says.

“If a big company would work with a startup like mine and launch a product that used insect protein, not only would they bring the money to the table for manufacturing and scaling up, but they would bring the marketing, and their brand would bring credibility to the public. That’s the positive way to put it.”

He adds, “The other way to put it is they could spend several million dollars and get LeBron James or Leonardo DiCaprio to eat it on a commercial, and then everybody will do it.”

The government, Dossey points out, also needs to support insect protein and startups robustly. “This will get the scale up, price down and provide access to the public so their perception will improve with experience and buy-in from major brands.

“Based on biology and efficiency, insects should be the least expensive and most environmentally friendly source of protein. That they are not already is simply a matter of financial and infrastructure resource allocation,” he concludes.

As someone who is concerned about life on earth and passionate about protecting biodiversity, the Ph.D. Biomedical Scientist and self-taught Entomologist believes that positive change will always look impractical artificially if resources have not been applied to the right revolutionary ideas.

He says, “if the production economy of insect protein improves and prices could go down magically, big companies would be interested—sort of a catch 22.” He adds that investing in new technologies and automation will make insect farming scaleable and economically feasible.

Holistically, Chau asserts that insects are cheaper alternatives than beef, pork, and chicken as there is less feed, less land, less water, and overall fewer inputs to grow insects. “However,” he says, “the new infrastructure for large-scale insect farming and the electricity needed to grow insects are still largely unknown, as commercial operations are not yet at a large scale.”

According to the food scientist, commercial insect growth operations may be on par with commercial plant-based meats and cellular agriculture operations, pending the processes. Again, this circles back to the importance of investing in the right technology and automation procedures to make insect farming worthwhile.

The “Ew” Factor

Ultimately, many people simply find insects to be unappetizing. According to Chau, culturally speaking, many societies deem insects to be dirty and full of disease, which enables a close-minded society toward insect consumption. Furthermore, Chau continues, insects may be labeled as an allergen if entering into mass markets as insects are often closely related to shellfish.

If labeled as an allergen, this limits food manufacturing facilities as concerns over cross contamination will be paramount. Lastly, Chau notes that existing regulations around insects in quality assurance would need to be reworked or re-worded, which only slows down the acceptance of insects into prepared foods.

“Flavor, texture, and color Chau says, will all be new to the public, creating a huge barrier to buying new foods. While marketing and commercialization may influence perception, “education in marketing efforts,” he says, “will require years of training the consumer to adapt to eating insects.”

Wrap Up

Food culture is known to evolve. Or else Americans wouldn’t eat lobster today, nor would Italians eat tomatoes. Experts project that the demand for insect protein to eat will increase as more people become concerned about their health. This could explain why online searches for “insect-based food” have increased significantly over the last five years.

The number of searches has increased by 640 percent. Other trending startups operating in this space include Aspire Food GroupTebrito, and BugBox. With all the benefits of eating insect protein and the right partnerships, it’s hopefully only a matter of time before consumers adopt this product.

This article was produced and syndicated by Wealth of Geeks.


Amaka Chukwuma is a freelance content writer with a BA in linguistics. As a result of her insatiable curiosity, she writes in various B2C and B2B niches. Her favorite subject matter, however, is in the financial, health, and technological niches. She has contributed to publications like ButtonwoodTree and FinanceBuzz in the past. In addition to ghostwriting for brands like Welovenocode, Noah and Zoey, and Ohcleo, amongst others.  You can connect with her on Linkedin and Twitter.




Source link

#Bugs #Dinner #Americans #Resist #Meat #Alternative #Wealth #Geeks