Donald Trump Knew Exactly What The Hell He Was Doing.

What’s in the indictment of Donald Trump in Manhattan, may it be the first of many? And what kind of information can we learn from reading it?

Well first of all, hot tip, ladies and gentleladies: Don’t do crimes. And if you happen to be running for president and there are all these people out there saying “Extra! Extra! Read all about my porn peener hallelujah funtimes with the presidential candidate!” do NOT engage in major criminal schemes to organize payoffs to all those people and then lie about it in business records.

Just a life hack for you, courtesy of Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg.

All the 34 felony counts are for falsifying business records. That document is boring to read. Click it to verify that we’re not foolin’ ya about it being boring, but then move on. It just says “these are the crimes.” They are felonies instead of misdemeanors because DA Alvin Bragg and the grand jury assess that Trump falsified those business documents in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy to pay off Stormy Daniels to keep revelations of their sex story from damaging Trump’s presidential prospects.

Considering the tiny margin by which he “won,” and considering how Russia saved him from the “Access Hollywood” tape literally minutes after it broke, by dropping Anthony Podesta’s emails through Wikileaks, concealing that story absolutely could have moved the needle. That’s why this matters.

(For the record, he pleaded “not guilty,” for the record, we don’t believe him.)


The document you’ll want to read is the statement of facts, and it’s an easy-peasy quick read. Why, we even think your average Fox News viewer could figure it out, if any of them were ever inclined to check Fox’s work. (Which is why it’s too bad they probably haven’t actually heard about the Dominion lawsuit texts that show that Fox News characters knowingly and willingly lie to them, like all the time.)

The statement of facts tells the whole entire story, not just the part about Stormy Daniels. It tells the story of how Trump and his loyal pals worked a whole scheme to keep naughty porny stories about him from coming out, thereby influencing the 2016 election. If you’ve been reading Wonkette and/or following American politics pretty closely since that election, a lot of this will be familiar to you.

Read it yourself, but the document describes:

1. How Michael Cohen, at the direction of Trump, paid Stormy Daniels $130,000 for her silence, by borrowing the cash from his HELOC, routing it through a BS consulting LLC he created, and then Trump and the Trump Organization engaged in all kinds of hinky shit to pay Michael Cohen back and make it look like legal fees. (He was not on retainer.) They even paid him back far over and above $130K, so that once he paid his taxes he would end up square.

2. How there was a whole “Catch and Kill” scheme/agreement with the former publisher of the National EnquirerDavid Pecker! — whereby they’d make sure to get the “rights” to a person’s exclusive story, and then, like, never publish it. For instance, Karen McDougal, the Playboy model! And remember … the doorman? We had almost forgotten about the doorman.

Here are some words:

[I]n or about October or November 2015, the [American Media, parent company of the Enquirer] CEO learned that a former Trump Tower doorman (the “Doorman”) was trying to sell information regarding a child that the Defendant had allegedly fathered out of wedlock. At the AMI CEO’s direction, AMI negotiated and signed an agreement to pay the Doorman $30,000 to acquire exclusive rights to the story. AMI falsely characterized this payment in AMI’s books and records, including in its general ledger. AMI purchased the information from the Doorman without fully investigating his claims, but the AMI CEO directed that the deal take place because of his agreement with the Defendant and Lawyer A.

When AMI later concluded that the story was not true, the AMI CEO wanted to release the Doorman from the agreement. However, Lawyer A instructed the AMI CEO not to release the Doorman until after the presidential election, and the AMI CEO complied with that instruction because of his agreement with the Defendant and Lawyer A.

“Lawyer A” is Cohen, if you didn’t figure that out yet. The “Defendant” is Trump, if you are a big dumb who needs everything spelled out.

3. In the section about Karen McDougal, Bragg underlines that arrangements were being made there because “The Defendant did not want this information to become public because he was concerned about the effect it could have on his candidacy.” You know, in case Trump really wants to try the “Melania defense” with any of this, arguing that he did all these things because he so very much didn’t want to hurt his wife’s feelings.

4. Once it gets to the Stormy Daniels section, it sets the scene, starting with the “Access Hollywood” tape on October 7. It talks about how worried Trump and his campaign were that it would hurt his candidacy. And it talks specifically about how Trump encouraged Cohen to wait as long as possible to actually make the payment to Stormy Daniels, because maybe once the election happened, it would be a moot point. (See again: “Melania defense” is bullshit.)

The Defendant directed Lawyer A to delay making a payment to Woman 2 as long as possible. He instructed Lawyer A that if they could delay the payment until after the election, they could avoid paying altogether, because at that point it would not matter if the story became public. As reflected in emails and text messages between and among Lawyer A, Lawyer B, and the AMI Editor-in-Chief, Lawyer A attempted to delay making payment as long as possible.

But then they paid her.

From there it goes into great detail about exactly how they falsified the business records, and who-all’s grubby paws were on those checks. (Donald Trump Jr., oh hey.)

And it details alllllll the witness intimidation of Michael Cohen — Trump’s efforts to keep him from cooperating with the feds, and how that one lawyer Robert Costello whispered sweet nothings in Cohen’s ear about how he was so close with Trump’s lawyer and he could be a “back channel” between Cohen and Trump and “Sleep well tonight, you have friends in high places.”

It goes ahead and copy/pastes Michael Cohen’s guilty pleas too:

[O]n or about the summer of 2016, in coordination with, and at the direction of, a candidate for federal office, I and the CEO of a media company at the request of the candidate worked together to keep an individual with information that would be harmful to the candidate and to the campaign from publicly disclosing this information. After a number of discussions, we eventually accomplished the goal by the media company entering into a contract with the individual under which she received compensation of $150,000. I participated in this conduct, which on my part took place in Manhattan, for the principal purpose of influencing the election. […]

[O]n or about October of 2016, in coordination with, and at the direction of, the same candidate, I arranged to make a payment to a second individual with information that would be harmful to the candidate and to the campaign to keep the individual from disclosing the information. To accomplish this, I used a company that was under my control to make a payment in the sum of $130,000. The monies I advanced through my company were later repaid to me by the candidate. I participated in this conduct, which on my part took place in Manhattan, for the principal purpose of influencing the election.

So much of this was in the criminal information in federal court for Michael Cohen, and of course a lot of it we know from reporting and congressional testimony and just wherever else.

Cohen went to prison for this shit.

Now Donald Trump should too. He knew exactly what the fuck he was doing.

[Trump criminal information]

Follow Evan Hurst on Twitter right here

And once that doesn’t exist, I’m also giving things a go at the Mastodon (@[email protected]) and at Post!

Have you heard that Wonkette DOES NOT EXIST without your donations? Please hear it now, and if you have ever enjoyed a Wonkette article, throw us some bucks, or better yet, SUBSCRIBE!

Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.



Source link

#Donald #Trump #Knew #Hell

Joe Tacopina: Trump’s Newest Bad Lawyer

It’s either because he’s a terrible client or never pays his bills or no one wants to be on the losing side, but Donald Trump has an uncanny ability to pick out the worst attorneys to ever pass the bar. His latest legal draft pick: Joseph Tacopina, who appeared on this Sunday’s “Meet The Press” with Chuck Todd.

Similar to an infamous appearance by Rudy Giuliani, Chuck Todd’s oft-suppressed journalistic instincts awakened when given such an incompetent target. The trouble for Tacopina began when Todd asked why Trump got the media and the right-wing into a lather about his impending arrest last week. Tacopina, because he couldn’t just say his client is a bullshit artist who is willing to incite dumbasses to protect his own hide, tried to blame others.

TACOPINA: No, he didn’t make it up, he was reacting towards a lot of leaks coming out of the district attorney’s office. There had been a leak, Chuck, that Monday, the day before that Tuesday, there was a law enforcement meeting, including Secret Service and NYPD, that was going to go through the logistics of the arraignment. […] So he just, I think he just assumed based on those leaks that that’s what was going to happen.

As
Lemony Snicket once wrote, “Assumptions are dangerous things to make, and like all dangerous things to make — bombs, for instance, or strawberry shortcake — if you make even the tiniest mistake you can find yourself in terrible trouble.” Neither Tacopina nor his client have ever learned this lesson, which is why the rest of Tacopina’s answers to Todd’s questions came off as a series of unfortunate events for his credibility. When Todd read some of Trump’s public statements on social media, specifically targeting Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, Tacopina attempted to change the subject.

TACOPINA: So Chuck, as his lawyer, I want to dissect this case, because it’s a case that shouldn’t be brought and wouldn’t be brought if it were anyone other than Donald Trump, let’s be clear about that. Does anyone actually think […] that anyone else would be prosecuted for making a civil settlement in a hush money case with personal funds? Of course not.

Literally that was what Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, was prosecuted for and served federal prison time for. The crime, mind you, that was at the direction of and reimbursed by Donald Trump through his businesses and he’s currently being investigated for.

Todd, again, pressed Tacopina about Trump’s attacks on Bragg through social media and Tacopina deflected poorly.

TACOPINA: […] Again, I’m not his social media consultant. I don’t — I think that was an ill-advised post that one of his social media people put up, and he quickly took down when he realized the rhetoric in the photo that was attached to it. But that being said —

TODD: You’re only referring to the baseball bat.

TACOPINA: … I’m not here to defend or support —
TODD: He didn’t take down the other rhetoric. […]

Tacopina then reverted back to his only defense of Trump, mainly that this was “personal funds” and “would have been made payment irrespective of the candidacy or campaign,” which he views as bulletproof for his client. But when Todd pulled his best
Inigo Montoya impression about this “personal funds” argument, Tacopina made a colossal legal mistake that even Todd couldn’t ignore.

TODD: […] So you call it personal funds. It is, in a court of law, it’s been proven —
TACOPINA: It is personal funds.

TODD: — that it was Trump Organization funds.

TACOPINA: It’s personal funds. It was not funds related to the campaign. That’s the distinction —
TODD: But he used a Trump Organization check.

TACOPINA: It’s not campaign finance laws. But Chuck, that’s personal, that’s personal. It has nothing to do with the campaign —

TODD: So everything with the Trump Organization is Donald Trump the person?

TACOPINA: Let’s focus this —

TODD: I mean, you realize the door you’re opening there.

I don’t think Tacopina realized what he did there, Chuck, as his continued answer dug the hole deeper.

TACOPINA: […] These were personal funds. By all accounts, these were personal funds, not campaign funds. It’s personal or campaign – whether Trump Organization, Donald Trump the person, you know, Mar-A-Lago Corporation, whatever it is – they’re personal and not campaign funds. And that’s the key distinction here. If they were campaign funds, we’d be having a different discussion. […]

But, as Todd then pointed out, Tacopina’s client might not be facing campaign finance charges.

Tacopina basically admitted what everyone knows: The Trump family uses his organizations and corporations as their own personal piggy banks, much like they did with the Trump “charities.”

This makes DA Bragg’s case much easier … not that he needs help since he’s done this type of case many times before despite what Trump’s surrogates say.

TODD: But again, what this investigation may end up being is about the, essentially the falsifying business records. Which by the way, this prosecutor has brought over 60 – this one and the previous one – has brought over 60 times over the last four years. This is not an unusual crime to charge somebody with […]

When Todd brought up falsifying business records and ledgers to say the payments were “legal fees,” Tacopina outlined how somehow that was ok in what will probably be what he’s remembered for after all this.

TACOPINA: […] Seriously, what would he personal ledger? “Payment for hush money to quiet an affair that I claim I never had so my family doesn’t get embarrassed.” Is that what he should put in his ledger? There’s no, nothing wrong with putting whatever you want in your ledger […] You’re being petty. […]

Todd ended the segment these clips of a very familiar lawyer saying how this was crime when it was first reported in 2018.

We bet Tacopina wishes his reality show dreams hadn’t flamed out 5 years ago.

Have a week.

Click the widget to keep your Wonkette ad-free and feisty.



Source link

#Joe #Tacopina #Trumps #Newest #Bad #Lawyer