International cooperation to improve biodiversity is essential for the survival of our planet

‘Critical carbon stores, such as ice sheets, forests, peatlands, wetlands and the ocean, must take equal priority with cutting emissions’

Wera Hobhouse is the Liberal Democrats’ Climate Change and Transport Spokesperson and MP for Bath 

In May 2022, the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) announced that key UK ecosystems are close to their tipping points. Meanwhile, the Government only hopes to stop this from getting worse by halting biodiversity loss.

Their net zero strategy also largely ignores the health of our interconnected natural systems in its plans. To name a few, the atmosphere, oceans and soil are all vital to regulating the climate.

The Stockholm Resilience Centre outlines nine boundaries that enable a ‘safe operating space’ for the survival of humanity. Climate change being just one.

Seven of the nine boundaries have now been crossed, and yet political attention to the natural world always falls short. The importance of COP15 lies here – biodiversity must take centre stage.

International cooperation to improve biodiversity is therefore essential for the survival of our planet. This year, the conference is being held in Montreal, where, unsurprisingly, Rishi Sunak is nowhere to be found.

Critical carbon stores, such as ice sheets, forests, peatlands, wetlands and the ocean, must take equal priority with cutting emissions. The Centre for Ecology & Hydrology estimates that the equivalent to 34 years of the UK’s total CO2 emissions are stored in peatlands alone. But their degradation from neglect has the opposite effect. Shockingly, the carbon this releases accounts for 4% of UK net greenhouse gas emissions.

Where peatlands store around eight times the carbon of an equivalent area of tropical rainforest, it is unjustifiable that their huge potential for reducing emissions is being ignored. With 13% of all blanket bogs being in the UK, it is a dereliction of duty for the Conservatives to ignore these effects.

The Liberal Democrats have a long history of working to protect our natural environment, including a commitment to introduce a Nature Act to restore the natural environment through large scale restorations of peatlands, woodlands, marshland and much more.

What’s more, our water ecosystems are constantly under threat from indefensible sewage discharges. Over the summer, Liberal Democrat research revealed that several sewage discharge monitors at British seaside resorts are either faulty or have not been installed. In total, one in four (24%) of sewage discharges went unmonitored last year because water companies either failed to install monitors, or the monitors weren’t working for at least 90% of the time.

These numbers are down to the Conservative government letting water companies get away with it. I am calling for a 16% sewage tax on the £2.2 billion annual profits of these companies to improve our sewage system and protect vital ecosystems.

On land, the story is similarly disappointing. Almost 50% of UK methane, 70% of nitrous oxide, and 87% of ammonia pollution comes from agriculture. Dangerous pesticides and chemical crop treatments end up poisoning our drinking water and food. Be assured that my Liberal Democrat colleagues and I will continue to oppose the use of these damaging pesticides, to protect our wild pollinators, and stop further damage to our biodiversity.  

Biodiversity loss is not just a risk to our health. This year, a report by the House of Lords Library discussed the ramifications of climate change and biodiversity loss on our food security. In it was highlighted the IPCC’s assertion that if global warming was not kept below 2 degrees it would lead to ‘malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies, concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, Central and South America and Small Islands. Global warming will progressively weaken soil health and ecosystem services such as pollination, increase pressure from pests and diseases, and reduce marine animal biomass, undermining food productivity in many regions on land and in the ocean.’

The Government commissioned an independent review into the economic impacts of biodiversity loss and its results were deeply worrying. Intensive farming techniques and the use of pesticides were found to be damaging the ecosystems necessary to ensure the long-term security of food production across the globe. The CCC has also raised concerns that more frequent extreme weather events will damage crops, livestock and fisheries both in the UK and around the world. This would lead to greater volatility in our food prices domestically as a result of what could be a 20% rise in food prices globally. Of course, this will impact upon us negatively as our food prices spike but also it will test our humanity.

The tragic events in the Channel we have seen recently will become only more horrifyingly frequent as people in the global South flee the worst effects of climate change, biodiversity loss and its effects on their food systems. We must also remember our compassion when dealing with climate change and treat this a global humanitarian crisis as much as a domestic, economic one. The problems this country is having with refugees and the demonisation of our fellow human beings by some politicians will become disturbingly more frequent and the rhetoric more repulsive if we do not take drastic action now.

Saving the planet is a colossal mission that can only be solved with international cooperation due to the interconnected nature of earth’s ecosystems. Working together allows us to leverage the power of collective action to make a real and lasting difference for biodiversity.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful – and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

Source link

#International #cooperation #improve #biodiversity #essential #survival #planet

Newslinks for Sunday 18th December 2022 | Conservative Home

Sunak accuses Lynch of being the “Grinch” who stole Christmas

“Rishi Sunak today accuses Mick Lynch of being a “Grinch” who wants to “steal Christmas” with his crippling rail strikes. The PM said the RMT had caused “misery for millions” with their “cruelly timed” walkouts. In his most outspoken attack on unions yet, he accused Mr Lynch of trying to hold Britain to ransom with his “class war”… Turning the screw on Sir Keir Starmer, he said Labour admit union pay demands are “unaffordable” but they will “still take union money and undermine the interests of the travelling public”. He spoke out as Britain is hit by the biggest wave of industrial unrest since the 1980s. Railway workers, hospital staff, border force guards and posties are all walking out in pay rows.” – Sun on Sunday 

  • RMT run by a hard-Left cabal of activists who are plotting a general strike – Sun on Sunday
  • Pubs and restaurants to lose £2.3 billion because of crippling strikes – Sun on Sunday

Military not ‘sufficiently trained’ to cover NHS strikes, unions say

“Unions have lashed out at plans for the armed forces to cover for striking public sector workers in the run-up to Christmas, claiming the military are not “sufficiently trained” to plug staffing gaps on the frontline. The government is deploying 1,200 troops from the army, navy and RAF to fill in for ambulance drivers and border staff during widespread strikes over the festive period, with more than 1,000 civil servants also drafted in to help. But while ministers have insisted their chief concern is public safety, unions have accused the government of trying to “mask” the “effectiveness” of strike action, having spent time on contingency planning that could have been “better” invested in securing a deal.” – The Observer

  • We are not spare capacity for strikes, says Armed Forces head – Sunday Telegraph
  • Public support for nurses’ strike divides Tories – The Observer

More:

  • How our heroes are being left to freeze in squalor – Mail on Sunday
  • Life as a squaddie: poor housing, low pay and now Christmas is ruined – Sunday Times

>Today: ToryDiary: Both Streeting and Javid can see the NHS emperor has no clothes. But neither will produce the fundamental reform it requires.

Prime Minister scraps Truss’s long-term energy deal taskforce…

“Rishi Sunak has scrapped a taskforce launched by Liz Truss to secure long-term energy deals for Britain. The Energy Supply Taskforce has been abolished after just three months. Ms Truss unveiled the initiative in September as part of a package to tackle soaring energy bills caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. It was inspired by the UK’s Vaccine Taskforce, which was set up during the Covid-19 pandemic with a remit to secure effective vaccines as quickly as possible… In October, the taskforce was reported to have been in talks with liquefied natural gas companies. But on Saturday a Government source said it had been scrapped because it would have committed the UK to paying historically high prices for years on end.” – Sunday Telegraph

…as Shapps launches campaign advising people how to save money this winter

“Grant Shapps has launched a public information campaign advising people how to make financial savings this winter – months after the former prime minister Liz Truss blocked it. The £18m campaign, called It Adds Up, claims people could save £230 a year by implementing what is says are simple measures. Radio and TV adverts will be rolled out and a dedicated website, Help for Households, will be launched to encourage people to restrict use of their electrical appliances. The campaign launched with a video in which the energy secretary encourages people to save money by stopping draughts and turning down boilers and while battling with a pesky Elf on the Shelf.” – The Observer

Millionaires return to the Tory fold in bid to kill off Labour with cash

“Nadhim Zahawi, the Conservative Party chairman, has boasted he expects to rake in up to £15 million in new donations, putting the party on course to overtake Labour’s fundraising efforts and create a significant election war chest. Mohamed Mansour, the Egyptian billionaire and a minister under the Hosni Mubarak regime, is understood to have made a significant donation, which some figures claim could be as much as £4 million. If made as a single donation, it would represent one of the largest such gifts in politics. Graham Edwards, the executive chairman and millionaire co-founder of Telereal Trillium, the largest privately owned property company in the UK, is also set to make a big donation, according to party figures.” – Sunday Times

  • Sunak will deliver election victory like Major in 1992, vows top Tory – Sunday Express

Sunak ‘to take on Netflix’ amid Harry & Meghan accuracy row

“Rishi Sunak will give the broadcasting watchdog the power to take on Netflix for the first time, amid a row about accuracy in the Harry & Meghan documentary. Ministers are planning to pass a new law that would bring all streaming giants under the jurisdiction of Ofcom and hand it the power to impose fines of up to £250,000. Viewers would also be able to complain to Ofcom about shows on Netflix, Amazon Prime and other services and see them investigated for breaches of a new code of conduct. The plans are expected as soon as next year and will form part of the Government’s Media Bill, which will also promote “distinctively British content”, The Telegraph understands.” – Sunday Telegraph

  • The plans will form part of the Government’s Media Bill and could be next year – Mail on Sunday

Town halls to be given a new legal duty to make roads safer for women

“Michael Gove is launching a massive crackdown on dark and unsafe streets after a spate of brutal murders of women after dark – including Sarah Everard. Councils will be given a new legal duty to take the safety of women and girls into account with all new housing and planning projects. It will mean new houses, streets and towns cannot be built unless they include things like street lights. The radical shake-up comes amid widespread alarm at the safety of women and girls on Britain’s dimly lit streets… The consultation for the new duty of care will be unveiled in the National Planning Policy Framework this week. It will spell out in national policy that town hall bosses must “think about the safety of women and girls in public spaces when setting planning policies and taking decisions”.” – Sun on Sunday

Braverman urges Sunak to go further on immigration

“Suella Braverman has privately urged Rishi Sunak to remove the influence of the European Court of Human Rights when considering the appeals of illegal migrants, The Telegraph can disclose. The Home Secretary has sided with Tory rebels who believe the Government’s immigration reforms announced this week do not go far enough to deal with the migrant crisis, and has proposed tougher legislation to circumvent Strasbourg rulings. Mr Sunak has said that under new rules, all illegal migrants will be placed in detention centres before being flown either to Rwanda or another designated safe country. His plan includes a new law, to be tabled within weeks, that will “make unambiguously clear that if you enter the UK illegally you should not be able to remain here”.” – Sunday Telegraph

  • Britain could ignore Euro judges 11th hour orders to block deportation flights – Sun on Sunday
  • Home Secretary is fuelling Farage politics, says former adviser – Sunday Times

Comment:

  • Who will the Left blame when boats keep sinking under Starmer? – Dan Hodges, Mail on Sunday

Brexit freedoms will see Britain create next Silicon Valley, Hunt declares

“Brexit freedoms will allow us to create the next Silicon Valley here in the UK, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has declared. Sir Patrick Vallance, the Government’s Chief Scientific Advisor who featured regularly on TV screens during the Covid crisis, is to draw up new regulations designed to promote innovation and replace burdensome red-tape from Brussels. Leading figures from the UK’s high-tech industries will assist him to ensure Britain can lead the world in digital technology, green industries, life sciences, advanced manufacturing and the creative industries… It’s the latest in a series of Brexit reforms to grow the economy, after the Chancellor last week announced that hundreds of pages of EU laws regulating financial services industries will be repealed and replaced.” – Sunday Express

Tory members furious about ‘insanity’ of ousting Johnson, former chairman says

“Tory members are furious about the loss of Boris Johnson, the party’s former chairman has said, as he warns the Conservatives will struggle at local elections if they cannot rely on activists to knock on doors. Sir Jake Berry said grassroots campaigners had become disillusioned following the “insanity” of ousting Mr Johnson earlier this year, combined with their “perceived disenfranchisement” after Liz Truss was driven from Downing Street. In an interview with The Telegraph, he said it “should be a matter of deep concern” that membership of the Conservative Party has dropped significantly in recent years… Sir Jake, a close ally of Mr Johnson who received a knighthood in his resignation honours list, was Tory party chairman during Liz Truss’s short-lived tenure at Number 10.” – Sunday Telegraph

  • Tories ‘at risk from rightwing insurgency’ warns Cruddas – The Observer

More:

  • Cabinet Office scraps ‘gender inclusion’ workshops after complaints – Sunday Telegraph
  • UKRI splurges £100 million of taxpayers’ cash on ‘woke’ projects – Sun on Sunday

Source link

#Newslinks #Sunday #18th #December #Conservative #Home

How the IRS Helped Candidates Tied to Hamas-Linked CAIR Win Georgia Elections

Muslims now make up 10% of the Georgia Senate Democrat delegation.

[Order David Horowitz’s and John Perazzo’s new booklet: “Internal Radical Service: Abuse Of Taxpayer Dollars To Advance Leftwing Causes Illegally And Unconstitutionally”: CLICK HERE.]

In 2015, Ruwa Romman was enabling Oglethorpe University’s Students for Justice in Palestine to pass the first BDS resolution in the region. Around the same time the Jordanian immigrant began working with the Georgia Muslim Voter Project and became the communications director for the Georgia operation of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the funding of Hamas. A year earlier an individual in Atlanta by the same name urged readers to “join the BDS movement” during the Hamas campaign against Israel caused by the Muslim Brotherhood terror group’s kidnapping and murder of three Israeli teenagers, including Naftali Fraenkel, an American citizen.

“I could write chapters about what I have gone through,” Ruwa Romman, told CNN, alleging that she had faced constant discrimination and hate in America.

From CAIR she went on to the Poligon Education Fund. Poligon was co-founded by Wardah Khalid, an anti-Israel activist with UNRWA and the Friends Committee who is now working on bringing Afghans to this country as a senior policy advisor in the Office of Refugee Resettlement at the Department of Health and Human Services. Despite the fact that Poligon was specifically set up to promote the “Muslim presence on Capitol Hill” and lobby members of Congress, it operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit in what is a likely violation of tax codes tolerated by the IRS.

Now, Ruwa Romman is an incoming member of the Georgia House of Representatives.

Gushing media profiles depict her as the “first Muslim woman” in the Georgia House and the first “Palestinian” elected in the state. Beneath the fawning media profiles that emphasize her accomplishments are the greased wheels of a political machine that abuses its nonprofit status.

The Georgia Muslim Voter Project, where Romman worked to “increase voter turnout”, is also a 501(c)(3), despite its political agenda and involvement in elections, and partnered with CAIR’s Georgia chapter, also a 501(c)(3). In a midterms press release, CAIR Georgia congratulated Nabilah Islam and Sheikh Rahman, who were elected to the Georgia State Senate, and Farooq Mughal and Ruwa Romman, elected to the Georgia House. All four are Democrats.

Muslims now make up two members or 10% of the 22 member Georgia Senate Democrat delegation. To understand how disproportionate this is, there are 5 white and 2 Muslim Democrats in the Georgia Senate. That’s in a state with a population of 10 million where Muslims, despite frenzied growth, still amount to approximately 100,000 migrants.

Muslims make up 1% of Georgia and yet enjoy a representation ten times their number.

This disproportionate Islamic power reflects the tremendous political influence that Islamists have gained over the Democrat Party and the political machine that mobilized to elect CAIR allies. It is no coincidence that the two Georgia Democrats in the United States Senate, Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff, are both opponents of Israel and have Islamist ties and backing.

Last year, CAIR touted an exit poll showing that 91% of Georgia Muslims had voted for Warnock and Ossoff. Only 6% voted Republican.

“Georgia Muslim voter turnout and preference were a deciding factor in electing Rev. Warnock and Ossoff, tipping the balance of power to Democrats in the U.S. Senate,” CAIR-Georgia boss Abdullah Jaber boasted.

CAIR, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, which is barred by tax codes from getting involved in elections, was boasting of its people electing Democrats, after having been involved in getting Muslims to the polls.

But as Internal Radical Service by David Horowitz and John Perazzo documented, the IRS has enabled the rise of a Democrat empire of nonprofits funding partisan elections. That is part of what happened in Georgia and around the country. And Islamists are taking advantage of it.

Behind the Islamist political machine was a lot of money. Much of it coming from the Left.

The Georgia Muslim Voter Project scored $110,000 from the Southern Poverty Law Center. The SPLC misleadingly described this as grants for groups led by “black people and people of color.”

The CAIR-allied project also benefited from funding provided by the Proteus Fund and the Southern Partners Fund.

Ruwa Romman had co-founded the Georgia Volunteer Hub focusing on the 2021 runoff whose members included not only CAIR and the Georgia Muslim Voter Project, but Stacey Abrams’s New Georgia Project, Bloomberg’s March for our Lives and the Young Democrats. Its goal had been training volunteers for the runoff. The Hub illegally mixed C3s like CAIR and the Georgia Muslim Voter Project with openly partisan Democrat groups while working on an election.

Having been incubated and prepped by her experience working with election nonprofits, funded at taxpayer expense, the CAIR Islamist in her hijab was more than ready for a turnout election.

Romman beat Republican candidate John Chan by 57% to 42% in the general election after beating another Chinese candidate, J.T. Wu, in a narrow Democrat primary by a mere 579 votes. District 97, with a population of 67,480 is 34% white, 14% black, 11% Hispanic and 27% Asian. Turnout for the Democrat primary was less than 5% of the overall statistical population. And turnout for the general election was at a little over a quarter.

The Islamists had used nonprofit taxpayer-funded resources to turn out their voters, focusing on voter registration in the mosques that have popped up as organizing centers across Georgia.

And the mosques are nonprofits too.

That also helps explain what happened in Georgia elections in the last few years.

Muslim migration has changed the demographics of the state. In 2010, there were an estimated 53,000 Muslims in Georgia. That number appears to have doubled. Atlanta boasts of 80 mosques and 75,000 Muslims. At the same time the number of Muslim inmates tripled.

Georgia had one of the fastest growing populations fueled by refugee resettlement. It is no coincidence that the co-founder of the Poligon Fund has gone on to work as an adviser for the Office of Refugee Resettlement which is moving 1,000 Afghans into Georgia.

With more to come.

In 2021, 3.2% of all refugees were directed to Georgia. This is part of the wave of demographic change which Islamists have harnessed, but which transcends any particular group, and yet whose overall goal is to transform conservative states like Georgia into leftist dominions.

CAIR Georgia’s government affairs director noted that they were in a “state where the Muslim population is only approximately 0.7 percent of the total population – much of it centered in the Atlanta metropolitan area.” That population is growing quickly, but more importantly it’s organized. And the organizing is funded by leftists and by nonprofits protected by the IRS.

The Georgia Muslim Voter Project is an example of a new wave of Islamist organizations which have moved beyond advocacy and into elections. The Project takes in funding from leftist groups, but also from new Islamic-leftist funding mechanisms such as the Pillars Fund, a “national nonprofit” that “amplifies the leadership, narratives, and talents of Muslims”.

Pillars, founded by a former program director for the McCormick Foundation, boasts a board of directors that includes Saleemah Abdul-Ghafur, a chief of staff for the Bill Gates Foundation, and Deana Haggag, a program officer at the Mellon Foundation. The Pillars Fund has received grants from the hijacked Doris Duke Foundation and $1.6 million from the MacArthur Foundation.

While Americans slept, Islamic organizations morphed and crept deeper into the infrastructure of the Left, capturing its election machines and its foundations. Georgia is just one of the results.

The Muslim Brotherhood, always adept at imitating the organizations and societies it wants to take over, has copied the political structures of the Left, working from within, building its own models and merging them into the originals in order to achieve greater power and influence.

“Our democracy is under attack by Republicans,” Ruwa Romman claimed. But what sort of democracy do Islamists believe in?

As Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the World Trade Center bombing once said, “In time, this so-called democracy will crumble, and there will be nothing. And the only thing that will remain will be Islam.”

CAIR Georgia last year promoted a broadcast on the “Life and Contributions of Imam Siraj Wahhaj”.

That is its idea of democracy. And the abuse of nonprofits for election activities means that we’re funding our own takeover.

Source link

#IRS #Helped #Candidates #Tied #HamasLinked #CAIR #Win #Georgia #Elections

The Consequences of Opting Out: Why We All Have a Role to Play in Society

I have been thinking a lot lately about why we are so apathetic in Northern Ireland. Practically every public service is on its knees and getting worse, but all we can manage is a collective shrug of the shoulders (see Why are we so apathetic about our collapsing Health Service?)

One issue that does not get enough attention is how the people who make the decisions tend to be least affected by the decisions. Take yesterday’s demonstration against the shameful Education Authority cuts to youth services like homework clubs and youth clubs.

Was anyone actually in the EA building to hear the protest? Or were the people who make the decisions working from home and oblivious to it all?

The great untold story of the Troubles was how cocooned many of our middle class were. The violence was concentrated mainly in a few key areas like North and West Belfast and Derry. If you had a decent job, you could live a great life in South Belfast or North Down and not be affected at all. More than that, the Troubles actually made life easier for the middle classes: it kept house prices down, and we generally had a lower cost of living than the rest of the UK. The middle class had excellent Grammar schools for their kids and even free University places.

An economist once told me that a BMW dealership here had the highest sales figures in Europe. Our public sector had the same pay rates as the rest of the UK, but the lower cost of living meant that quite a few people here had a high disposable income and could easily afford luxury German cars and foreign holidays. Even now, you still see an abnormal amount of BMWs on our roads, mostly driven by impatient entitled people.

So we have a history of the middle classes closing the curtains when times get tough. But this trend has only been accentuated lately as society gets ever more privatised. All over the western capitalist world individualism is growing. People are less involved in groups and clubs, they are going out less and spending more time at home.

If you have teenagers you know the problem is not trying to get them home at a reasonable hour, but getting them to leave the house at all. From the Washington Post:

According to the Census Bureau’s American Time Use Survey, the amount of time the average American spent with friends was stable, at 6½ hours per week, between 2010 and 2013. Then, in 2014, time spent with friends began to decline.

By 2019, the average American was spending only four hours per week with friends (a sharp, 37 percent decline from five years before). Social media, political polarization and new technologies all played a role in the drop. (It is notable that market penetration for smartphones crossed 50 percent in 2014.)

Covid then deepened this trend. During the pandemic, time with friends fell further — in 2021, the average American spent only two hours and 45 minutes a week with close friends (a 58 percent decline relative to 2010-2013).

Similar declines can be seen even when the definition of “friends” is expanded to include neighbors, co-workers and clients. The average American spent 15 hours per week with this broader group of friends a decade ago, 12 hours per week in 2019 and only 10 hours a week in 2021.

On average, Americans did not transfer that lost time to spouses, partners or children. Instead, they chose to be alone.

The percentage decline is also similar for the young and old; however, given how much time young people spend with friends, the absolute decline among Americans age 15 to 19 is staggering. Relative to 2010-2013, the average American teenager spent approximately 11 fewer hours with friends each week in 2021 (a 64 percent decline) and 12 additional hours alone (a 48 percent increase).

I don’t have data for us but I imagine it would show a similar trend.

Newton Emerson has been having similar thoughts. Writing in Thursday’s Irish News:

The pandemic has certainly laid a path for public fatalism but an older phenomenon is also recognisable.

Northern Ireland’s comfortable classes are retreating from the political fray, as they did during the Troubles, to concentrate on looking after themselves.

Self-absorbed suburban banality was the typical experience of life during the Troubles, a fact often noted with amazement by outside observers. It has been largely forgotten because history is only interested in protagonists and nothing could be less fashionable than the survival strategies of the provincial bourgeoisie.

This society has an extraordinary capacity to endure a crisis but it does so by drawing the blinds and turning away, leaving the worst-affected to their fate. You could still be unlucky during the Troubles, of course, but people believed they could protect themselves by disengagement, respectability and a little bit of affluence.

That protection was not just from violence but from any material or psychological disturbance to a nice, normal life.

Although the Troubles are not coming back, their middle class coping mechanism could easily return as public services fall apart. People will quietly turn en masse to private medicine: medical insurance is fast becoming a standard perk of professional jobs here. School fees will arrive, one way or another. The potential for private security as policing numbers shrink is intriguing and ominous.

A resilient job market will provide a sense of protection from bad luck.

There will be respectable sympathy for the unfortunate but little empathy: they can always get a job, or a better job; they should stop voting for parties that cannot agree; we are now paying insurance and tax, so why pay more tax?

Once Northern Ireland gets into this way of thinking, it can get stuck in it for a very long time.

During the summer we took a day trip out to Seapark beach in Holywood. While junior paddled in the water I looked out over Belfast Lough towards North Belfast. It struck me that I was sitting in the richest part of Northern Ireland gazing over at the poorest part of Northern Ireland but North Belfast might as well be on Mars for all the thought our rulers give it.

In a way, I don’t blame people. If I was not involved with Slugger I would probably try my best to ignore it all as well. I have written many times before about how depressing I find the news. When the world gets overwhelming it is a natural response to go inward and shut out the noise. During winter I have been going to bed early at 9:30. Being under the warm duvet reading my kindle is the perfect relief to a particularly depressing winter.

BUT reality has a way of bursting your bubble. The African Ubuntu philosophy advocates the belief in a universal bond of sharing that connects all humanity, or in simple terms, we are all in this together. Stepping over the beggar on your way into the shopping arcade does somewhat spoil the experience. A night out in Belfast city centre is marred by the number of drug addicts roaming around. It is hard to fully embrace your life of middle-class bliss when the media is full of endless reports about people too skint to put the heating on or the increasing demands on foodbanks.

So the lesson for all those in positions of power is while it is tempting to stick your fingers in your ears and go “la la la,” eventually the misery will seep in. You are because we are.

 may throw your rock and hide your hand
Workin’ in the dark against your fellow man
But as sure as God made black and white
What’s down in the dark will be brought to the light
… You can run on for a long time
Run on for a long time
Sooner or later God’ll cut you down
Sooner or later God’ll cut you down

 



Source link

#Consequences #Opting #Role #Play #Society

Week-in-Review: The Northern Ireland protocol is a Brexit legacy Sunak cannot ignore – Politics.co.uk

The news that Ulster shipbuilding company Harland and Wolff will receive £1.6bn of ministry of defence funding is a significant and very symbolic development in Northern Ireland’s politics. 

Founded in 1861, Harland and Wolff’s shipyard, which built the Titanic and many other vessels, is a symbol of Ulster’s once formidable industrial prowess. Its giant cranes, nicknamed Samson and Goliath, dominate the Belfast skyline. But their stoicism belies Northern Ireland’s industrial stagnation. 

It is no secret that Ulster’s long and cruel economic decline has been implicated in a broader crisis of unionist identity. And thanks to the six counties’s post-Brexit political stasis, this crisis is only getting sharper. 

On Friday, during his first trip to Northern Ireland as prime minister, Rishi Sunak made a point of visiting the famous Harland and Wolff shipyard. He understood the symbolism of the moment, saying: “If you think about it, Belfast used to be home to the world’s largest shipyard so I think it is really fitting that it is going to complete the next generation of our navy support ships, which increase our security at sea”. 

This was a statement of intent. Indeed, by announcing a billion-pound investment in Harland and Wolff and prioritising a trip to its shipyard, Sunak was reaffirming in the strongest possible terms his support for the Union. 

But this is the very same Union that Brexit, in a horde of complicated ways, has put at risk. 

The abstract nouns that drove the Brexit argument, namely “freedom”, “sovereignty” and “control”, have very different meanings in the six counties. But the 2019 Brexit deal, negotiated and passed by Boris Johnson, nonetheless insisted on total delivery on those terms.

Johnson’s Brexit deal was deliberately designed to do as little damage as possible to Northern Ireland’s constitutional settlement. The agreed solution was the “Northern Ireland Protocol” which would avoid a so-called “hard border” between Northern Ireland and the Republic while instituting checks for goods passing across the Irish Sea border. It was a compromise that critics in the hardline Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) see as undermining the integrity of the internal British market. 

The DUP nonetheless played a starring role in the Brexit drama that led to this point. 

In what increasingly looks like a profound political miscalculation, the DUP put itself in league with the hard-right Eurosceptic wing of the Conservative party through 2016-2020. It even propped up Theresa May’s second administration from 2017 to 2019 as part of a confidence and supply deal. 

The DUP supported Brexit uncompromisingly despite the fact that Northern Ireland is a political entity inherently tied to Europe, given roughly half of the population are Irish citizens, and therefore EU citizens.

Caught in political limbo

Because of their opposition to the NI Protocol, the DUP resigned its first minister from the Stormont executive in February 2022. It has subsequently demanded that action be taken to mitigate its impact in Northern Ireland as the basis for it re-entering the power-sharing arrangements established by the 1998 Good Friday Agreement. 

The result is familiar: a state of total internal political deadlock in Northern Ireland.

In fact, among all the Brexit legacies which Sunak and the Conservative party can deny and/or choose to ignore, Northern Ireland’s political stasis is simply impossible to overlook. There is no disguising that the first minister’s office is unoccupied and that vital legislation relating to cost-of-living in the six counties is caught in limbo. 

The response to the Brexit-induced deadlock from both Johnson and Liz Truss was the “Northern Ireland Protocol bill”, proposed legislation which is currently the subject of a legal challenge by the EU. Of course, you can understand the EU’s antagonism — the bill, if passed, would empower ministers to scrap post-Brexit arrangements without the approval of Brussels.

A new approach?

Upon becoming prime minister, Rishi Sunak has been anxious to signal key breaks with the past Conservative administrations. The NI Protocol bill is no different. 

According to a report in The Sunday Times, Sunak has now placed the contentious bill, which the DUP desperately wants to see enacted, “on ice”. After six years of chaos and recrimination between London and Brussels, it is thought to be a gesture of “goodwill” amid ongoing negotiations between UK and EU counterparts. 

A tone of contrition has been adopted across government — including by Northern Ireland minister Steve Baker, once the hardest of the hardline Brexiteers. His humility in a recent interview with Ireland’s RTÉ radio was striking: “I recognise in my own determination and struggle to get the U.K. out of the European Union that I caused a great deal of inconvenience and pain and difficulty”. He added: “Some of our actions were not very respectful of Ireland’s legitimate interests. And I want to put that right”.

In a further sign of the improving mood music, during his meeting with President Joe Biden last month, Sunak voiced his hope that a deal could be done with the EU early in the new year. This would avoid the need for another contentious Stormont election which is currently being mooted for a similar time. 

The pro-Protocol parties

But Sunak’s positioning is especially difficult because the NI Protocol is actually popular in Northern Ireland, notwithstanding unionism’s concerted remonstrations. As a post-conflict society struggling with a legacy of industrial decline (see Harland and Wolff), the protocol offers Northern Ireland a unique opportunity for economic growth. It provides the region with unparalleled dual market access to both the UK and EU Single Market.

For many observers, domestic and international, the protocol is a well-defined practical solution to Northern Ireland’s intricate geographical and political challenges. It is the best of both worlds. 

Interestingly, former DUP leader Edwin Poots essentially admitted as much last July in a letter to the UK government while serving as Northern Ireland’s agriculture minister. The politician said it would be “unacceptable” that the Northern Ireland Protocol bill, if enacted, would force the region’s farmers to accept the same agricultural subsidy regime as the rest of the UK.

Crucially, Poots’s Protocol predicament underlines unionism’s increasingly divergent political and economic incentives. In an unabashed display of Brexit cakeism, Poots insisted: “There’s nothing wrong with cherry picking”.

But those hoping for a DUP U-turn on the Protocol will be disappointed. Not backing down is hardwired into ulster unionism’s political instincts: “not an inch”, “what he have we hold”, “no surrender”, are all familiar phrases in the unionist vernacular. In any case, that the DUP’s grassroots are so fired up against the Protocol, makes movement from its leaders essentially impossible

The unhappy compromise to come…

Northern Ireland’s political settlement is predicated on the principles of cooperation and compromise, but the “one-side-takes-all” approach to the Brexit debate, advanced since 2016, leaves little room for productive negotiation. 

Nonetheless, Sunak is keen to bill himself as a “problem solver” politician — and he wants to have a crack at the Protocol. But only time will tell whether he can fashion a compromise between the varied stakeholders on the issue; indeed, so complex is Northern Ireland’s politics, that Sunak must forge political consensus between actors with interests as diverse as the EU, Northern Ireland’s non-unionist parties, Northern Ireland’s unionist parties, the Republic, the British government, the European Research Group and probably the United States as well. 

And given the realities of post-Brexit politics, “compromise” is a difficult word indeed. Good luck, Mr Sunak. 



Source link

#WeekinReview #Northern #Ireland #protocol #Brexit #legacy #Sunak #ignore #Politicscouk

Raffensperger Squelches NYT’s Claim He Wants Ranked-Choice Voting

Georgia’s top election official pushed back Thursday on reports that he advocates implementing ranked-choice voting, a controversial procedure known as an instant runoff, in the state. 

The denial from Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office comes one day after he called for the  state Legislature to reform the state’s election system to avoid future runoffs. 

“Secretary Raffensperger has not endorsed any specific proposal or suggested otherwise,” Raffensperger spokesman Robert Sinners told The Daily Signal in an email Thursday. 

A runoff occurred again this month in Georgia when U.S. Sen. Raphael Warnock, the incumbent Democrat, defeated Republican challenger Herschel Walker after a second round of voting.

“Some inaccurate reporting has emphasized ranked-choice voting–which is simply untrue,” Sinners told The Daily Signal in the email. “The call will be up to the [Georgia] General Assembly.”

Alaska and Maine are the only two states currently using ranked-choice voting statewide. In November, Nevada adopted ranked-choice voting for its elections when voters approved a ballot quesion. 

In this procedure, voters rank their choices among candidates for an office, and the same ballots are counted several times until a winner emerges. 

In a follow-up question, The Daily Signal asked Raffensperger’s spokesman about a New York Times article that paraphrased Raffensperger as presenting ranked-choice voting as one of three options for state legislators to consider. 

The New York Times’ Dec. 8 report reads

Mr. Raffensperger said he would present three proposals to lawmakers. They include forcing large counties to open more early-voting locations to reduce hourslong line like the ones that formed at many Metro Atlanta sites last week; lowering the threshold candidates must achieve to avoid a runoff to 45% from 50%; and instituting a ranked-choice instant-runoff system that would not require voters to come back to the polls again after the general election.

Asked about this by The Daily Signal, Sinners responded: “No specific proposals have been provided to legislators as of yet.”

Reason, a libertarian magazine, also reported this week that Raffensperger would consider asking lawmakers to switch to ranked-choice voting. 

But Reason’s reporting was based on the Times’ account. Other media outlets reporting that Raffensperger advocated ranked-choice voting also relied on the Times’ reporting. 

The Georgia Libertarian Party Senate candidate Chase Oliver tweeted his support for adopting this system in Georgia. 

The Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, issued a statement slamming Raffensperger based on previous news reports, most of which seemed to trace back to the Times article.

“In his vain attempt to garner attention from the media and the socialist left, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is looking to disenfranchise voters by making it harder and more confusing to vote by seeking to change the Georgia voting system to ranked-choice voting (RCV),” CPAC’s statement says, adding:  “CPAC calls on Gov. Brian Kemp and the Georgia Legislature to reject Secretary Raffensperger’s attempt to upend Georgia’s successful election reforms by implementing the failed ranked-choice voting system.”

Georgia-based conservative commentator Erick Erickson tweeted this week that he was “reliably told that Georgia’s secretary of state was misunderstood by a reporter.” 

Erickson apparently was referring to New York Times reporter Reid J. Epstein. 

 
Under Georgia law, if no candidate wins 50% of the vote, the election automatically goes to a runoff. Georgia and Louisiana are the only two states that hold runoffs as part of a general election, while 10 states–including Georgia–provide for runoffs during primary elections, according to Ballotpedia

“Georgia is one of the only states in the country with a general election runoff,” Raffensperger said in a public statement Wednesday. “We’re also one of the only states that always seems to have a runoff. I’m calling on the General Assembly to visit the topic of the general election runoff and consider reforms.”

Here’s more on how ranked-choice voting works: 

Instead of choosing a single candidate for a given office, voters rank each candidate from “1” to “2” to “3” and so on. If one candidate wins 50% or more of the first-preference votes, the election is over. If no one wins the first tally, the candidate with the fewest first-preference votes is eliminated and election officials make another tally of votes for the remaining candidates. 

Voters who selected the eliminated candidate as their first choice have their vote counted for their second preference in this next round. Counting continues, perhaps with one or more other candidates eliminated, until one candidate eventually emerges with a majority of votes. 

In ranked-choice voting, a voter doesn’t have to rank his choices and may opt to pick just one. However, if a voter doesn’t select and rank multiple candidates, his or her ballot is more likely to be discarded after the first round of counting. 

In addition to Nevada, the localities of Seattle; Portland, Oregon; Multnomah County, Oregon; Fort Collins, Colorado; Evanston, Illinois; Portland, Maine; and Ojai, Calfornia, adopted ranked-choice voting as the result of November ballot questions. 

The ranked-choice system is used in 62 jurisdictions nationally, according to FairVote, a group that advocates the procedure. 

Some conservative commentators criticize ranked-choice voting, charging that it helped Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who technically is a Republican, defeat the Alaska Republican Party’s endorsed candidate, Kelly Tshibaka, while Rep. Mary Peltola, a  Democrat, defeated her Republican challenger, former Gov. Sarah Palin. 

But Rob Richie, president of FairVote, stressed that ranked-choice voting can be used differently across jurisdictions and shouldn’t be painted with a broad brush. Richie noted that states with runoff elections allow military and overseas voters to use ranked-choice voting only for absentee voting. 

Richie added that the Virginia Republican Party has adopted the system for state nominating conventions, as has Canada’s Conservative Party. 

“Georgia has so many runoff elections in primaries and generals that a candidate has to run four times to get elected and voters have to vote multiple times,” Richie told The Daily Signal in a phone interview. “Why not just have an instant runoff election?”

New York City, larger than several states, had notable problems using ranked-choice voting for the city’s 2021 primary elections. 

“No election official should propose ranked-choice voting, because it confuses and leads to disenfranchising voters,” said Hans von Spakovsky, manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at The Heritage Foundation. (The Daily Signal is Heritage’s multimedia news organization.)

Von Spakovsky argued there is merit to having runoff elections. 

“Voters are shortchanged if they don’t have the chance to evaluate the top two finishers,” he said. “It’s important for the individual who wins a race to have a majority choosing that individual. A plurality can be questionable.”

Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email [email protected] and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. 



Source link

#Raffensperger #Squelches #NYTs #Claim #RankedChoice #Voting

America with all good intentions still does stupid shit around the world

US and the world

Serge Galitsky writes: The statement supposedly made by Barack Obama — “Don’t do stupid shit” — succinctly expresses what should have been the guiding principle of US foreign policy (“The simple reason America can’t stop doing stupid things”). But even Obama couldn’t help himself and he quickly engaged in the “democratic” coup in Kyiv, the origin of the hideous war in Ukraine.

The “liberal” cheerleaders are enthused with the good fight and encouraging the poor Ukrainians to suffer and die so that Western liberals can feel good. Enthusiasm for the good fight has now ensured that any questioning of the crusade means that you are a Putin apologist and no friend of democracy. The US very wisely will not commit to the fight except to bankroll Ukraine and impose increasingly ineffective sanctions on Russia with unpleasant repercussions on its own allies.

I have to congratulate Crikey on publishing the Stephen M Walt article. Hitherto Crikey carried little mention of Ukraine apart from the usual Ukraine boosterism. The rest of Australia’s mainstream media is a desert. There is no intelligent comment on the publicly funded ABC, and SBS produces nothing. I look to the internet for comment from informed writers such as Walt and John Mearsheimer as well as Colonel Douglas MacGregor and Scott Ritter. American commentators shine. The British scene is bleak; if anything the Brits are even more invested in boosterism. And in dear little Oz we celebrate 50 years of foreign policy independence under Whitlam with tepid acquiescence to American silliness by Richard Marles and Penny Wong.

Get 25-50% off

Spin the wheel to see what you’ll win when you sign up for a year of Crikey.

Spin now

Could not a real ally politely suggest that it is time to stop doing stupid shit?

William Morgan writes: Should the US mind its own business? This is a tricky one. When we look at the Bay of Pigs affair in Cuba, Vietnam, the Iraq War and the support of repressive governments in South America and the Middle East we could say that it should not have intervened. However, it supported France and Britain against Nazism and Australia against Japan in World War II. The Marshall Plan allowed western Europe to rebuild and prosper, all the while protecting it against Soviet expansion and repression with NATO. The isolationism of pre-World War II and more recently Donald Trump often has a white nativist anti-Semitic quality. All I know now is with an expansionist China and Vladimir Putin waging war in Europe (not the other way around as the author suggests) I am grateful the Biden administration is engaged in world affairs.

Calling the shots

Margery Clark writes: The decision to go to war should have been decided by Parliament years ago — that would have avoided our participation in Iraq, Afghanistan and even Vietnam (“Defence says the Parliament should have no say on whether Australia goes to war”). Australia is always joining wars in places that we are in no danger from, and the money that is squandered by these adventures is disgraceful.

Meghan and her prince charming

Ian Robinson writes: Great piece by Madonna King (“The ferocious pile-on over Harry and Meghan says more about us than them”). As a republican I wasn’t going to watch their Netflix documentary but in the end I did to see what the fuss was about.

It’s not the best television I’ve ever seen but despite its boring bits, it clearly shows an admirable young couple valiantly trying to make their way in a hostile world, where they are the targets of racism and the prejudices of a privileged elite and the machinations of an unscrupulous media. The net effect was to increase my admiration for Meghan and Harry and to reinforce my disgust for the forces lined up against them. The negative reaction of the latter to the doco simply proves the point.

Gayle Davies writes: Having lost my mother in a car accident in my first year at high school, I identify with Harry, and understand his reasons for simply wanting a family life of his own, independent of the seething familial tensions he grew up with. I don’t understand the furore over the documentary, or even why people are watching it — except perhaps as an expression and outlet for their own familial tensions. 

Gerri Hupfeld writes: Meghan and Harry do not deserve the vitriol and bias they have received. However, it was always on the cards that it would be so because there are trolls out there. But why would a reporter say she nearly lost her breakfast over the first episode? Are reporters not required to just state the facts and keep personal opinions to themselves? Do they not realise they have influence even as they decry this couple for being influencers? Leave this couple alone. They have been through enough.

No comment

Richard Cobden writes: You may well have switched off comments on “Prosecutor Shane Drumgold should never have pursued Bruce Lehrmann’s case” for the usual reason that comments on such trials and their underlying events can all too easily cross a boundary and give offence. But in doing so you protect Adam Schwab and his perspective and treatment of the issue from criticism. And criticised they should be.

With all the benefit of hindsight, and loftily above the pressures from #MeToo and a huge groundswell of public opinion, Schwab condemns the ACT director of public prosecutions Shane Drumgold for prosecuting Bruce Lehrmann while throwing in a tendentious, irrelevant and vicious reference to Drumgold’s sad family history.

I subscribe to Crikey because it exposes journalism like that, not because it perpetuates it. 

Mutt and Jeff

Sharman Grant writes: I was interested to read Stephen Mayne’s article on Jeff Kennett’s master strokes (“What does Dan Andrews’ plan to ‘bring back the SEC’ actually mean?”). Why didn’t he mention the hospitals and care facilities that Kennett closed? What was the cost to the community of those decisions?

Also: “The whole point of Victorian energy sector privatisation was to fix Victoria’s debt-laden balance sheet and break up a lazy government monopoly by introducing competition.” Good prices and good products should be the desired outcome and the so-called competition did not get Victorians anything like that. No one can even understand their power bills. “Competition” is not an outcome, mate!

The Musk sticks

Peter Clifton writes: Elon Musk is fed up with the left-wing media and US Democrats’ manipulation of big tech and the damage that causes to free speech in a cancel culture environment (“The Twitter Files are becoming Elon Musk’s QAnon”). So he’s exposing Twitter’s past complicity in that anti-democratic endeavour. If Cam Wilson is so much smarter and so much more knowledgeable about the real world than Musk, why is it that Musk who started from scratch but now dominates EV world production, puts space vehicles into orbit, is now one of the richest men in the world? (Editor’s note: Musk’s father ran an emerald mine in South Africa.)

And Cam Wilson? All we know is that he is a socialist nobody who builds nothing except distrust from people looking for genuine news. Interesting questions?

Susan Wood writes: I closed my Twitter account soon after Musk took over. I really liked Twitter and spent too much time on it. I was mainly interested in politics and the opportunity to share my ideas and opinions about events, politics, comments and articles. It was an addiction which I’ve had to give up, on principle, since I don’t approve of Musk. I’ve decided to use my suddenly available free time to learn another language.

Z force

John Amadio writes: The “Z” symbol, a well-known and recognised symbol of Nazism, should be banned in any public place (“Ukrainian Australians say pro-Russian abuse is on the rise after attack at rally”). Those who display it should face prosecution, including jail time. Any thug-like tactics should be responded to fully.

If you’re pleased, peed off or piqued, tell us about it by writing to [email protected]. Please include your full name to be considered for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity.



Source link

#America #good #intentions #stupid #shit #world

Rudy Giuliani Not Out Of Order, THESE MARK MEADOWS COUP TEXTS ARE OUT OF ORDER!

Try to imagine what Republicans would have done if it emerged that Barack Obama’s White House chief of staff was actually running his re-election campaign. You can’t do it! Your head would explode! Leave aside for the moment that whole fomenting a coup thing. If Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz found out that government employees, whose salaries were paid by American taxpayers, were essentially working full time for the campaign, they’d burn the White House down.

So, before we get into the substance of Mark Meadows’s texts, let’s acknowledge the threshold scandal that he was the one running point to coordinate both the coup rally and the campaign. Which is FUCKING CRAZY!

And speaking of crazy, last night’s Meadows text drop from Talking Points Memo’s Hunter Walker and Josh Kovensky focuses on Rudy Giuliani, formerly America’s Mayor, now its Crazy Uncle who leaks hair dye at press conferences while accusing dead South American politicians of hacking the 2020 election. (Another TPM writeup, not to be missed, focuses on all the people on January 6 screaming ANTIFA! after explaining how not ANTIFA the whole thing sure seemed!)


Cast your mind back to that day, if you will. It was November 19, 2020. Rudy, Sidney, and Jenna crowded around the podium at the RNC to explain how Trump was totally gonna win this thing thanks to the Elite Super Friends Task Force of Future Bar Sanctionees.

THIS. ACTUALLY. HAPPENED.

And this.

Rudy Giuliani’s Hair Dye Leaks at One-of-a-Kind Press Conference | NowThis

Every normal American was dead of cringe. But not Ginny Thomas, the red pilled Missus of one Justice Clarence Thomas.

“Tears are flowing at what Rudy is doing right now!!!!????????” she texted her pal Mark Meadows during the event.

“Glad to help??” responded a seemingly confused Meadows, who was apparently watching the Sidney and Rudy Show in abject horror.

“Whoa!! Heroes!!!!” replied the emotional Mrs. T.

No doubt Meadows was pleased to see that his friend had recovered from her wee bout of spleen two weeks earlier when she texted the chief of staff to enquire if the rumors were true that “Biden crime family & ballot fraud co-conspirators (elected officials, bureaucrats, social media censorship mongers, fake stream media reporters, etc) are being arrested & detained for ballot fraud right now & over coming days, & will be living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition.”

But Rudy continued to be a problem for our man Mark in the White House.

“Frigging Rudy needs to hush…” Rep. Chip Roy groused on November 22, annoyed by Giuliani’s incontinence, both verbal and follicular, adding later that “If we don’t get logic and reason in this before 11/30 – the GOP conference will bolt (all except the most hard core Trump guys.”

Oh, ye of little faith! Those people hid in a bunker from an angry mob sacking the seat of government, and even that didn’t make ’em “bolt.”

Trump campaign advisor Jason Miller also had issues with the president’s lawyer.

“Chief – need your advice here. Rudy sent me this draft GA legislature petition this evening and asked me to put together a release for Sunday morning blast out, but you’ve made clear who is running our GA efforts,” he texted on December 6. “I’m the only one Rudy sent this to besides Jenna and Boris, so it’s not like a bunch of people know about it, but I don’t want to screw up our other efforts. All guidance appreciated, as the legal turf war thing is new to me!”

Presumably the “legal turf war” was between the competent counsel and the Elite Superfriends, who were more of the “wild allegations first, verify never” school of litigation. Meadows promised to run it up the flagpole with Trumpland attorney Cleta Mitchell, which is perhaps outside the normal duties of a public servant, but probably Meadows was too busy texting to notice.

A week later Miller was back, seeking advice about a press release Roodles wanted to put out in which he regurgitated all the loony conspiracy theories about Dominion Voting Systems and Antrim County and Dead Hugo Chavez. As it turned out, Miller wanted him to do … not that.

Hi Chief – sorry to be a stalker, but I wanted to make sure you saw the Dominion/Michigan release I emailed to you for review. The Mayor wants to put it out right away, but Eric (rightfully) thinks it doesn’t make any sense. This would be the first time shooting down a Rudy press release request, so I wanted to get your take on this as well. Thank you, Jason

Meadows response is not in the cache of documents provided to the House January 6 Select Committee, so let’s just assume that it’s really fuckin’ bad.

Meanwhile Rudy was trying and failing to get paid.

“Sir, we are airborne on the way to Michigan from Arizona. We’re going to need a hotel for the team and two vehicles to pick us up,” Giuilani’s pal Bernie Kerik texted Meadows on December 1. “Christina Bobb, Who is our coordinator back in DC does not have a credit card or authorization for these logistics. I reached out to Mike Glassner who Apparently is no longer on payroll. Can you I have some money coordinate with Christina to handle? Thank you sir.”

And Kerik wasn’t the only member of Rudy’s entourage with Meadows on speed dial. His girlfriend Maria Ryan also had lots of advice for Trump, which she relayed through his chief of staff. Here she is advising Trump to appoint Ken “No Butt Stuff” Cuccinelli as special counsel to investigate the election hacking

Dear Mark, I hope you are doing well. I am very happy POTUS has such a smart and honest man as you by his side. I strongly believe in a special counsel for election integrity. I strongly believe it CANNOT be Powell who leads it . K. Cuccinelli or someone of equal prominence. Powell can be named lead investigator or given another title. Also the issue with cyber security. Strongly recommend Radcliffe put out a statement that it was foreign interference, likely cast of characters is China, Iran and maybe Russia. ( unfortunately the media is saying definitively it was Russia but my sources say it is just as likely China- Radcliffe could shed light on this) Our President has been tough on all these nations and we will continue to seek to hold them accountable. These opinions expressed are my own. If I can be of help to you or our President please let me know . Dr Maria Ryan

It’s not clear what “sources” the hospital administrator had that gave her special insight on foreign election interference, but it is pretty funny that even she knew Sidney Powell was too crazy eyes to have any public facing role.

And speaking of funny, get a load of Sean Hannity yelling at TPM for breaking the “rules” by asking him for comment on his personal texts with the chief of staff:

“Number one, you’re not allowed to get my number,” Hannity said, adding, “What are your questions?”

When he was informed about the subject of this story, Hannity declared, “You want any interview with me, you have to go through Fox PR.” After assuring Hannity that we would also contact Fox News’ spokeswoman, Irena Briganti, TPM asked him if he thought it was “appropriate” for a member of the political media to do business deals with associates of the former president.

“You think it’s appropriate when you know Fox’s rules to bypass Irena and call me directly?” Hannity asked incredulously, before adding, “You can take your predetermined outcome, which is already written in your head, and write whatever the hell you want. I don’t give a shit. You knew the rules and you didn’t care.”

Hannity subsequently hung up the phone. Briganti did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Whiny snowflakes, the lot of them.

[TPM]

Click the widget to keep your Wonkette ad-free and feisty. And if you’re ordering from Amazon, use this link, because reasons.



Source link

#Rudy #Giuliani #Order #MARK #MEADOWS #COUP #TEXTS #ORDER

Disciplinary Committee: Rudy Giuliani Should Be Held Liable for Professional Sanctions Over False 2020 Election Claims

The DC Bar’s Board on Professional Responsibility found Rudy Giuliani violated ethics rules by making false 2020 election claims and should be held liable for professional sanctions, according to a new report by CNN.

This report by the attorney disciplinary committee is “preliminary and non-binding.” But it will move forward and is a “significant step forward” in the work to hold Trump lawyers accountable for their abuse of the court system using claims they could not and did not substantiate in their attempts to steal an election from The People.

The charges that the Trump lawyer violated attorney ethics rules stemmed from a case he brought in Pennsylvania, where Trump and his lawyers sought to toss the votes of hundreds of thousands of voters.

After Giuliani’s case was rejected by a judge, the Trump campaign was denied their efforts to file a revised complaint.

Giuliani was accused of having “weaponized his law license to bring a frivolous action in an attempt to undermine the Constitution.”

I discussed Giuliani’s efforts to steal votes in Pennsylvania Thursday morning in our Politicus Pod, including his reported girlfriend’s bonkers rantings about dead people voting as revealed in Mark Meadows’ texts obtained exclusively by Talking Point Memo published Wednesday evening:

The best part of this so far is that the disciplinary proceedings zeroed in on the lack of evidence Giuliani had BEFORE he filed the lawsuit. You know, having some kind of cause. Having a reason to make the wild claims he did. Something other than fantasy, conspiracy and pure fiction.

The effort to undermine the 2020 election was multi-pronged and seemed coordinated.

For example, Factcheck.Org had to do a deep dive on the “dead voters” claims due to Senator Lindsey Graham lying about this on Fox News, claiming they had evidence of it, and Giuliani, without evidence, calling Philadelphia an “epicenter of voter fraud” on the same program, adding that “we’re going to be looking at dead persons’ ballots, which may actually be very, very substantial.”

Which “may” be. Which may be is not evidence. It is hopeful delusion by this team.

“Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said the Trump campaign had “evidence of dead people voting in Pennsylvania…The Trump team has canvassed all early voters and absentee mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania. And they have found over 100 people they think were dead, but 15 people that we verified that have been dead who voted. But here is the one that gets me. Six people registered after they died and voted. In Pennsylvania, I guess you’re never out of it.”

Later in the interview, Graham said, “I do know that we have evidence of six people in Pennsylvania registering after they died and voting after they died. And we haven’t looked at the entire system.”

Even if they had six people, that would not overcome the 45,000 vote lead then Vice President Joe Biden had at the time.

But, the only person charged with felonies for trying to apply for a mail-in ballot in his deceased mother’s name in Pennsylvania was a Republican.

There was also an incident, cited by Trump campaign advisor Corey Lewandowski, as a “concrete example” that also turned out to be someone who, although deceased on October 22, cast a ballot which was received November 2 and recorded.

Family members said she planned to vote for Trump but no one could explain how her ballot got sent back after her death. I was unable to find an update on that situation, so it’s unclear if charges were brought.

Factcheck continued: On the same program, former New York City Mayor and Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani called Philadelphia “an epicenter of voter fraud” and said “we’re going to be looking at dead persons’ ballots, which may actually be very, very substantial.”

Philadelphia is a city of many Black people, like many of the other cities in which Republicans claim, without evidence, that voter fraud is rampant. What these consistent accusations of fraud are, in reality, is an attempt to delegitimize the lawful votes of Black people because Republicans know they do not win with the Black population. That is in and of itself a shameful attempt to intimidate and suppress the vote of people simply because of their race.

So, back to that disciplinary hearing focused on Giuliani filing a lawsuit before he had evidence.

CNN reports that Giuliani assured them that had it gone to discovery, he would have been able to provide more evidence and that he had been responsible in his filings because he was “responsibly alleging, based on the things that were told to me by other people. I wasn’t proving – I had a long way to go to prove.”

It is not responsible alleging to go off of things you’ve been told without doing any vetting of those claims. Giuliani knows this, as he was Manhattan’s US attorney.

Hamilton Fox, who brought the ethics charges, said Giuliani was pushing a “coordinated” effort to undermine the election.

Recommendations will follow this and then hearings in front of the entire board. The issue seems to be a desire to not chill other lawsuits (presumably of merit) while not allowing a “coordinated” effort to undermine faith and integrity in our elections to go unpunished.

It’s stunning and telling that Rudy Giuliani still has his law license after all of this. He tried to steal the most scared freedom the American voter has, based on nothing.

Giuliani shouldn’t be allowed to practice law after such a blatant attempt to sow discord and fuel lies about the most secure election in U.S. history.



Source link

#Disciplinary #Committee #Rudy #Giuliani #Held #Liable #Professional #Sanctions #False #Election #Claims

Newly revealed texts show Mark Meadows is a liar

Patrick Semansky/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Mark Meadows is a liar—at least by omission. And newly revealed text messages prove it. 

In 2021, the former White House chief of staff for Donald Trump released a book, The Chief’s Chief, which offered a sycophantic account of his tenure serving the reality-TV-star-turned-president. It made little news because it provided little news. In the book, Meadows fawns over Dear Leader. He blames Trump’s 2020 loss on Fox News’ less-than-enthusiastic coverage of Trump, other purported media conspiracies, and massive fraud. Of course, he cites no confirmed instances of significant voter fraud. But he insists it was clear Trump won. “I knew he didn’t lose,” he writes. How? Well, because of all the “palpable” excitement at the Trump rallies and the “feeling I got during the final days of President Trump’s campaign.” Alrighty, then. But there’s more: “If you looked at the social media traffic from that night—which, I did, constantly—there was no doubt about it: President Trump was going to be reelected by a healthy margin.” Talk about reality bias.

No savvy reader would expect Meadows to present an honest and accurate depiction of what transpired in the weeks after the election and on January 6. But he strives mightily to provide a phony recounting. He cites debunked allegations of fraud and claims the Democrats and the liberal media had plotted for years to set up a pretext in which Trump’s assertions of fraud could be dismissed as conspiracy theory nonsense and labeled “crazy” or “paranoid.” He calls this the “long con.” In Meadows’ telling, Trump and his attorneys merely engaged in legitimate court challenges to “uphold the Democratic process.” (Meadows mistakenly capitalizes “democratic.”) The problem, apparently, was that the courts, including the Supreme Court, didn’t have the guts to support these challenges. And then Trump, on January 6, simply made a farewell address to his followers that “did not call for violence,” and afterward he left the stage, informing Meadows he had no intention to head to the Capitol himself. When moments earlier he had told his loyalists that he would march with them toward Congress, Trump “had been speaking metaphorically.” (According to testimony provided to the House January 6 committee, Trump was intent on leading the throng and even got into a physical altercation with a Secret Service agent who would not allow him to do so.) Meadows shares not a single detail about his or Trump’s actions—or inaction—during the ensuing riot. 

Meadows was peddling disinformation. His book says nothing about Trump’s multiple efforts after Election Day to overturn the results. Missing from these pages: Trump pressuring Georgia election officials to “find” him enough votes to win that state (an effort in which Meadows participated); the fake electors scheme; Trump’s attempt to force the Justice Department to declare the election corrupt; the crazy conspiracy nutters who met with Trump and pushed him to seize voting machines; Trump muscling his vice president to block the certification of Joe Biden’s victory; Trump’s refusal to take steps to quell the January 6 riot; and much more. 

Also missing: any mention of the hundreds of text messages Meadows received from Republican elected officials and conservatives who pled with him to take drastic—and perhaps illegal—steps to undo the election results. 

This week, Talking Points Memo revealed a trove of thousands of text messages Meadows received and sent during the post-election period. Some of Meadows’ text messages had already been made public; many had not—particularly those in this set of messages that flowed to and from Republican members of Congress. A notable one was a text Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) zapped to Meadows on January 17, 2021, that cited a bonkers conspiracy theory about Dominion Voting Systems rigging the election and declared, “Our LAST HOPE is invoking Marshall Law!! PLEASE URGE TO PRESIDENT TO DO SO!!” (Norman misspelled “martial” law.)

A House member urging Trump to impose martial law—Meadows saw no reason to mention that in his book. 

As Talking Points Memo reports, “Meadows received at least 364 messages from Republican members of Congress who discussed attempts to reverse the election results with him. He sent at least 95 messages of his own… The members who messaged Meadows about challenging the election included some of the highest-profile figures on the right flank in Congress, such as Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), and Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL), all of whom are identified as playing leading roles in the effort to undo Trump’s defeat.” One dramatic message came from Rep. Brian Babin (R-Tex.) on November 6, three days after the election: “Mark, When we lose Trump we lose our Republic. Fight like hell and find a way. We’re with you down here in Texas and refuse to live under a corrupt Marxist dictatorship. Liberty!”

Throughout the post-election months, Meadows received multiple texts from Republican officials sharing crazy and baseless ideas about the election and extreme proposals for keeping Trump in office. Rep. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) texted Meadows a message saying there were links between Dominion and billionaire George Soros. Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) shared with Meadows an unfounded election conspiracy theory that originated with Alex Jones, the notorious conspiracy-monger. 

Meadows didn’t discourage any of this.   

As Republican legislators schemed to thwart the congressional certification of the electoral college votes for Biden, they kept in close contact with Meadows, a former House member. He encouraged Republican legislators who told him they were trying to stop the certification. The text messages show he met with these officials and that this GOP effort to undermine the election was supported by right-wing dark money groups, including the Conservative Partnership Institute, which hired Meadows after Trump left office. At one point, Jordan texted him that Vice President Mike Pence should disqualify electoral votes from key states to prevent a certification of Biden’s victory, and Meadows replied, “I have pushed for this. Not sure it is going to happen.” 

For some reason, Meadows did not share any of this with the readers of his book, not the GOP legislators’ endeavors to defy the election results nor his own role in this and other attempts to keep Trump in power. These texts, as well as testimony given to the House January 6 committee, confirm that he was in the center of the storm throughout these turbulent weeks and on January 6. Yet his memoir essentially says, nothing to see. The texts not only illuminate the Republican assault on the 2020 election that Meadows was part of; they reveal his own profound mendacity. 

Source link

#Newly #revealed #texts #show #Mark #Meadows #liar