Review: Rob Marshall’s ‘The Little Mermaid’ Enriches the Original | FirstShowing.net

Review: Rob Marshall’s ‘The Little Mermaid’ Enriches the Original

by Manuel São Bento
May 31, 2023

Yet another Disney live-action remake, yet another short preamble about the original flick before diving into this new one. For me personally, The Little Mermaid from 1989 was not an animated movie that marked my childhood. The memorable songs, underwater musical sequences, and the iconic animal characters kept my recent rewatch enjoyable enough, but unfortunately, the superficial, abrupt narrative and the extremely underdeveloped character arcs leave a lot to be desired. These are some of the details that I hoped might be improved in the modern live-action remake, which contains an extra hour on its runtime… Claiming that a remake matches or surpasses the original will always be controversial. And if it’s related to movies that deeply impacted different generations, the nostalgia factor comes into play and blinds viewers who feel the almost uncontrollable need to protect “their film” against any other positive opinion about the new version.

It’s starting to feel repetitive to mention in my reviews that my opinion isn’t affected by anything external. 2023’s live-action The Little Mermaid is merely a new target of the well-known vocal minority incessant in canceling everything that evades the barriers of the so-called “norm”. The inability to understand what are the important characteristics of a character seems more purposeful than innocent since it’s obvious that Ariel’s skin color – played by Halle Bailey in the remake – doesn’t matter at all for her arc or any storyline or anything else. It’s not worth wasting too much time on incomprehensible human complexities…

Without forgetting my feelings about the 1989 flick, I release the inevitable “hot take“: yes, I consider this remake of The Little Mermaid superior to the original. Calm down…!! I’m not stating it is an unparalleled masterpiece in the history of cinema. And no, I’m not pushing a political agenda because of the lead actress – come on, please… This new Disney movie directed by Rob Marshall (of Chicago, Nine, Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides, Into the Woods, Mary Poppins Returns) and written by David Magee also has its issues, but the narrative is incomparably richer, more complete, and more emotionally compelling than its predecessor, with all due respect to the authors of the first adaptation – who had to contend with the trend of short run-times at that time.

The Little Mermaid maintains the central themes of Hans Christian Andersen’s original tale: Ariel’s journey of self-discovery, the search for belonging and acceptance, the curiosity for adventure and new cultures… everything remains intact in this new adaptation. The big difference in this 2023 version is related to the time allocated to delve into all these topics, as well as the protagonists’ arcs. From details like explanations about Ariel and Eric’s family background to the lengthening of sequences from the original that needed more time to achieve the intended impact, the new script is unquestionably more fleshed out.

The greatest narrative growth can be found in the core relationship within The Little Mermaid story. The premise remains identical: Ariel and Eric must share a true love’s kiss for the mermaid to transform into a human being, having until the third day’s sunset to complete this mission. Not wanting to sound too crude with the 1989 flick, but at no point did I believe the characters fell in love with each other, much less for reasons so powerful as to be able to describe their kiss as one of true love.

In the original animated movie, both are more concerned with each other’s physical appearance, with Ariel even telling her father that she loves “handsome Eric” without the two having had any conversations yet. The first time Ariel sees Eric, she’s lost in the futile beauty of his face. In the remake, Ariel is fascinated by the prince’s words, creating an emotional connection with his personality, desires, ambitions, and way of seeing the world, in addition to only seeing his face right before the storm begins sinking the boat. Even after this first meeting, Ariel feels confused and keeps her interest in exploring the human world as her main motivation instead of being madly in love with a man she barely knows.

The second act of The Little Mermaid deepens their relationship even further, creating countless parallels between their pasts, the education they received, the future they want for themselves, their common passion for adventure, and their intense curiosity for different cultures. Both have a collection of antiques and when Eric takes Ariel on a tour of his kingdom, it’s a more extensive sequence, offering significant build-ups to impactful resolutions to much of what Ariel sings in the iconic song Part of Your World.

The Little Mermaid Review

The cast shares palpable chemistry, with Halle Bailey being the absolute standout. The actress proves to be tremendously charismatic, shifting the spotlight on herself whenever she’s on the big screen. In addition to her superb performance, her impressive voice echoes throughout the theater, grabbing the attention of all viewers as she sings outstanding songs from the score. Jonah Hauer-King is also excellent as Eric, even having his own song. The couple is incredibly charming together, but they aren’t the only ones that stand out. Daveed Diggs & Awkwafina manage to distinguish themselves from the original voices of Sebastian & Scuttle, respectively, by offering different accents and tones for both characters. I never expected them to reach the same levels as Samuel E. Wright (Sebastian) and Buddy Hackett (Scuttle), but the truth is, they’re absolutely hilarious. In the remake, there are more interactions between the two animals, resulting in more humor in addition to familiar scenes that are repeated. Jacob Tremblay also gives his best as Flounder.

Melissa McCarthy offers her body and soul to the evil octopus Ursula, respecting Pat Carroll’s previous work, but adding a more dramatic layer to the villain of The Little Mermaid. This Ursula sounds and looks more menacing than the 1989 flick, and retains some of her darker humor. Still, I expected more tweaks to her arc. There are some attempts to create a link between Ursula and King Triton, but here the screenplay holds the same superficiality that the original script had with Ariel and Eric. The past between the king and the sea witch wasn’t worthy of deeper development, despite Ursula’s motivations staying faithful to those of her predecessor.

Surprisingly, Javier Bardem is the only actor who disappoints. King Triton was never a highly expressive or emotional character, but in the original film, one could perceive the guilt and regret of a father trying to deal with a “rebellious” daughter. Bardem preserves the same expression throughout the entire runtime, focusing too much on the fact that he’s playing a king rather than a father.

On the technical side, The Little Mermaid has its qualities and flaws. The visuals are much better than the trailers let on, with some truly stunning moments, but that feeling of watching actors performing in front of a green screen never really goes away –  perhaps we just got used to the mind-blowing realism of Avatar: The Way of Water. The set and costume design deserve tons of praise, namely when the action moves into the human world.

The renowned songs are all beautifully performed and efficiently executed, with Kiss the Girl leaving my theater in tears due to so much laughter. It is, without a doubt, my favorite musical moment. Unfortunately, the new tunes don’t work at all. If Eric’s new song, called Wild Uncharted Waters, is still acceptable, others fall completely flat, especially a rap involving Sebastian and Scuttle that caught me off guard. It doesn’t fit the type of themes that the movie presents, sounding more like an outtake made for fun that somehow made the final cut than something seriously planned and perfected.

Composer Alan Menken’s score is everything a remake’s score should be. He takes his original work from more than 30 years ago and does the same as Magee’s screenplay: enriches what deserved to be enriched. Melodies become more complex and songs are stretched for longer sequences, contributing to a greater impact of the musical set pieces. If there’s an aspect impossible to criticize in this remake, it’s precisely this.

I have no more words to add to describe how surprisingly satisfying The Little Mermaid is. It’s not a perfect remake, far from it. There are better live-action adaptations from Disney, but it’s a major step in the right direction, a path the studio is rightfully taking by recalling these stories and offering new interpretations that – pay attention now – you may or may not enjoy! Our childhood isn’t going to be ruined by a new film. The original classics have never disappeared nor will they succumb to the void (let’s hope it stays that way). I’ll end this review with a personal example of how to deal with all these new remakes, if I may…

If you asked a few years ago what my favorite animated movies were, I wouldn’t mention Mulan. Although I always liked the original flick, I never saw it again as an adult, so somehow it fell into oblivion. If it wasn’t for the 2020 remake, I would never have revisited the original and realized how much I love it. I didn’t enjoy the remake much, despite praising Niki Caro’s courage in trying something risky and different. But I’m grateful every day for the fact that it was made because, without that remake, I wouldn’t have found myself rewatching the wonderful animated version again so soon. So, if you don’t like this new The Little Mermaid remake, that’s okay. Watch the 1989 movie again, share it with your family and, who knows, you might even enjoy it more after revisiting a story you love.

Final Thoughts

The Little Mermaid enriches virtually every narrative aspect compared to the original, deepening Ariel and Eric’s arcs while exploring the same core themes without losing any of its predecessor’s essence. The relationship between the protagonists is unquestionably more complex and emotionally compelling, while the secondary characters – namely Sebastian and Scuttle – remain genuinely hilarious. Halle Bailey is VERY impressive and the cast accompanies her excellently. However, it’s not without its problems: the new songs are, for the most part, forgettable; the visuals are better than anticipated, though the odd feeling of being surrounded by fake walls never quite disappears; and finally Ursula was left with unexplored potential. That said, it’s one of Disney’s best live-action remakes of recent times and deserves to be seen by every child in the world in need of some inspiration – as we all once were.

Manuel’s Rating: B+
Follow Manuel on Twitter – @msbreviews / Or Letterboxd – @msbreviews

Find more posts: Review



Source link

#Review #Rob #Marshalls #Mermaid #Enriches #Original #FirstShowingnet

‘The Little Mermaid’: Here’s Why the Halle Bailey-Starrer Is a Victim of Racism

Walt Disney Studios’ latest release, The Little Mermaid, starring Halle Bailey, has been courting controversy since the release of its trailer in September 2022.

Directed by Rob Marshall, the film is Disney’s first live-action remake of the 1989 Oscar-winning animated musical The Little Mermaid. However, Marshall’s portrayal of Ariel, a completely fictional underwater fish woman, as being black has enraged the critics of the internet.

So, what is the controversy surrounding Marshall’s film exactly about? What was the origin of Ariel? And is it different from Disney’s adaptation? Here’s all you need to know:

The Origin of Ariel

The origin of Ariel comes from Danish author Hans Christian Andersen’s 1837 short tale titled Den Lille Havfrue (The Little Mermaid). But Disney’s adaptation of both the character and the story significantly differs from the original.

  • In the original tale, where the characters aren’t particularly named, the little mermaid (Ariel) is the youngest of the Sea King’s six daughters.

  • She falls under the spell of a human whom she had saved from drowning, unlike Disney’s adaptation, where Ariel wishes for legs out of curiosity about life on earth or her love for the prince.

  • The biggest difference lies in the treatment of Ariel’s story — while Anderson’s tale focuses on her life ambition, Disney makes it all about her ‘happily ever after’ with prince charming.

  • However, the one thing that remains common between the two is Ariel’s physical appearance.

Anderson describes the character in his tale as, “The youngest was the prettiest of them all; her skin was as clear and delicate as a rose-leaf, and her eyes as blue as the deepest sea; but, like all the others, she had no feet, and her body ended in a fish’s tail.”

A still of Princess Ariel from 1989 Disney movie.

A Little More About Marshall’s Film

Marshall’s live-action remake of The Little Mermaid is loosely based on Anderson’s Danish tale. In addition to Bailey, the film boasts a stellar cast featuring Jonah Hauer-King, Melissa McCarthy, Noma Dumezweni, and Javier Bardem, among others.

  • The Little Mermaid is Disney’s second live-action remake of 2023, after Peter Pan & Wendy, which was released earlier in April.

  • Coincidentally, both films feature mermaids.

  • Marshall’s film also marks the sixth Disney Princess remake, after Cinderella, Maleficent, Beauty and the Beast, Mulan, and Aladdin.

  • The film was initially slated for a 2020 release; however, it was delayed twice due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Halle Bailey in and as The Little Mermaid.

The Racist Backlash Over Ariel’s Casting

This isn’t the first time the on-screen representation of an otherwise white-skinned character as being black has triggered a certain section of the audience.

Marshall’s live-action musical drama is just another addition to the list, as it casts a 23-year-old, biracial Bailey as Ariel.

  • Soon after the news of Bailey starring as Ariel made the headlines in July 2019, the film started to receive a lot of online hate.

  • The Little Mermaid’s official trailer on YouTube was bombarded with thousands of racist comments and received more than 1.5 million dislikes.

  • Consequently, YouTube hid the dislike counter on the trailer video.

  • In addition to the hate comments, an online campaign started bouncing around on social media using the hashtag: #NotMyAriel.

More so, the audience disapproval reached a ridiculous height when a group of critics released a digitally altered version of the trailer featuring a white woman in Bailey’s place.

An image shared by a Twitter user of a still from the AI-altered trailer of The Little Mermaid.

Claims Against Ariel’s Skin Colour

Yes, several people on the internet came up with innumerable self-proclaimed factual explanations of how Ariel (emphasis on her being a fictional character) is supposed to be a white-skinned mermaid.

  • One of the claims was that mermaids are European mythological figures, and therefore, Ariel’s skin colour should be white.

  • However, humanoid creatures that dwell in the water have been part of diverse mythologies around the world, including Middle Eastern, East Asian, and Oceanic folklore.

As per Zimbabwe’s Shona mythology, the ‘njuzu’, or mermaids, are water spirits who often come across as beautiful women residing in the lakes or rivers.

Mami Wata, or Mother Water, is the most celebrated mermaid-like deity, popular among the tribes of south-east Nigeria.

  • Another claim that was largely circulating on the internet was that since mermaids live under the sea and are not exposed to the sun, they cannot have dark skin.

  • While the above claim lacks factual evidence, it needs no proof that most sea creatures are not just pale, but they come in all sorts of colours — sometimes even as translucent.

The Reaction of the Makers

While it wasn’t really surprising for the makers to anticipate such racist backlash over Bailey’s casting in the show, they addressed the controversy several times to both the media and the fans.

Director Marshall told Deadline, “I didn’t think that it was a big deal, casting a woman of colour. I thought, ‘That’s an archaic way to see the world.’ When that controversy arose from narrow-minded people, I thought, ‘Wow, that really feels like it’s coming from another century.’ Are we really still there?”

In 2019, Disney also released an open letter to the audience on Freeform defending Bailey’s casting for The Little Mermaid. Take a look at their letter here:

The film’s lead actor and singer, Bailey, also expressed her opinion on the controversy. Entertainment Weekly quoted the actor saying, “As a Black person, you just expect it and it’s not really a shock anymore. I know people are like: ​’It’s not about race.’ But now that I’m her… People don’t understand that when you’re Black there’s this whole other community. It’s so important for us to see ourselves.”

The Little Mermaid is running in cinemas now.



Source link

#Mermaid #Heres #Halle #BaileyStarrer #Victim #Racism