Sinn Fein tries to claw back Irish votes as anti-immigrant anger rises

Not long ago looking like a government-in-waiting, Ireland’s leftist nationalist party suddenly finds itself out of step with a core constituency.

ADVERTISEMENT

Until just a few months ago, Ireland was psychologically preparing for what would have been one of its biggest political earthquakes in generations: a government led by nationalist party Sinn Fein.

But suddenly, what once looked inevitable now feels anything but — and far from making the political weather, the once-surging party is being forced to adapt to a changing climate.

Despite its history as the political wing of the terrorist Provisional Irish Republican Army during the Troubles, Sinn Fein has successfully turned itself into a mainstream force, albeit with a markedly leftist and populist bent by the standards of Irish politics.

At the last general election in 2020, it won nearly a quarter of the national vote, more than either of the country’s two largest established parties, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael. In the years since, polls frequently indicated it could be in a position to form a coalition government after the next national vote.

But in June this year, the European elections and simultaneous local vote saw Sinn Fein fall well below expectations, putting an end to the running assumption that it would be running the country in a coalition government of some kind by this time next year.

In a cruel irony, this setback came just after the party performed strongly in Northern Ireland at the UK general election on 4 July, where Irish nationalist parties won more of the region’s seats than those who believe the north should remain part of the UK. Sinn Fein is also the largest party in the Northern Irish Assembly, where its regional leader, Michelle O’Neill, is the first Irish nationalist ever to hold the post of first minister.

Given that the party’s raison d’être is to fully unite the island of Ireland as a single state, ending British rule in the six counties that make up Northern Ireland, its performance in the republic is now lagging behind its achievements in the north will be a major disappointment.

To make things more difficult, there are signs that Sinn Fein is losing ground with some of the communities at the very core of its historical base among working-class communities in Ireland’s cities and towns.

Revolt on the right

With the rise of a generation who do not associate it with the traumatic history of violent conflict on the island of Ireland and in the UK, the party has started to draw more support from educated, left-leaning and more affluent young Irish voters who share its progressive views on climate change, foreign affairs (particularly the Israel-Palestine conflict) and LGBTQ+ issues.

However, as it has worked hard to attract these supporters, Sinn Fein has found itself struggling to appeal to many of its traditional voters as they face a serious housing crisis, one that has become a defining issue in Irish politics — and which has provided space for a nascent far-right movement to take hold.

Far-right activists and agitators have been organising in Ireland for some time, but even though several extreme and anti-immigration parties have been formally established, they have so far failed to unify behind one.

Nonetheless, 2023 marked a watershed moment in their efforts as they successfully latched onto existing grievances about the perceived pressures placed on society by large-scale immigration, refugee arrivals and asylum seekers.

Ireland has taken a particularly large number of Ukrainian refugees — some 80,000 since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022 — and has housed many of them in hotels, including in small towns across the country.

There has also been an influx of people seeking asylum from a range of other countries. For the most part, these new arrivals have been received without incident or rancour. But the politics of accommodating them is not straightforward.

The main issue is Ireland’s chronic housing supply shortage, which has its roots in the financial disaster of 2008 and an ensuing era of underinvestment and sluggish housebuilding.

ADVERTISEMENT

The scale of the crisis is hard to overstate: while Ireland is home to a population of 5 million, the official estimate from the government’s Housing Commission says the shortfall of homes could be as high as 250,000.

Since the end of COVID-19 restrictions, evictions from private rented properties have become a major issue, and rents have risen sharply. There has been a concerted effort to increase the rate of housebuilding, with the government now committed to building more than 30,000 homes a year.

But while the shortage is addressed, many Irish families remain in temporary accommodation themselves — this as tens of thousands of new arrivals intending to settle in Ireland add pressure to the country’s desperately squeezed housing supply.

Far-right instigators have seized on this issue to foment not just discontent, but violence.

ADVERTISEMENT

Out in the streets

The main event to capture public attention was a full-blown riot in Dublin last November, which broke out after a man stabbed several people, including children, outside a primary school. The alleged perpetrator was a homeless man of Algerian descent who had been living in Ireland for 20 years.

Soon after news of the stabbings broke, violent scenes and looting broke out in the area, leading to some 40 people being arrested. Many blamed the incident on incitement and misinformation shared by far-right influencers, as evidenced by racist, anti-migrant and anti-Muslim chants heard during the riot.

However, while the incident was shocking, it was not even the first episode of anti-migrant violence in Dublin last year. In March, an encampment of unhoused migrants in the city centre was attacked and burned to the ground in an event celebrated by online racist groups as a “total gaelic victory”.

In the aftermath of these incidents, police have made an effort to deter asylum seekers and immigrants from sleeping rough in the capital, even going so far as to clear camps in the early morning — only for similar ones to spring up again nearby.

ADVERTISEMENT

Other incidents continue to flare up around the country, with right-wing influencers and would-be political leaders routinely sharing footage of protests outside migrant reception centres and buildings being prepared as temporary accommodation for asylum seekers.

The most recent major conflagration came in Coolock, in North Dublin, where a protest against a mooted migrant housing centre escalated into clashes with police and saw a former factory set on fire.

The protest was backed by a group calling itself “Coolock Says No” — a formulation adapted by online activists to frame similar flare-ups in other areas.

‘None of us have a veto’

From Sinn Fein’s point of view, the increasingly visible anger at large-scale refugee arrivals is not easy to navigate.

ADVERTISEMENT

The right-wing agitators who generally amplify small protests on social media often frame them in terms of both social class and Irish racial identity, fusing a long nationalist tradition of working people’s uprising with which Sinn Fein identifies together with more explicitly racist and ethnonationalist discourse that cuts directly against the liberal social values they have embraced in recent years.

In the areas of social media where the issue is being stirred up, hashtags like #IrelandIsFull are giving way to ones like #IrelandForTheIrish. Protests against asylum reception centres and housing in various areas are cast by journalists from lesser-known hardline right-wing outlets as part of a nascent uprising against the government, and news stories involving violence or criminality by foreigners — particularly those of colour or of Muslim faith — are rapidly circulated.

For Sinn Fein, the difficult task is to simultaneously critique the government’s policies in their role as an opposition party, reject knee-jerk and racist opposition to the arrival of asylum seekers and immigrants, and recognise that some of the voters it needs are getting involved in what looks increasingly like a social movement, albeit one that does not yet have a principal electoral outlet of its own.

The awkwardness of this balancing act was on display at a recent press conference where party leader Mary Lou McDonald was asked by a right-wing journalist why she did not support communities getting a veto over proposed asylum centres.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I really don’t think it’s helpful for us to get lost in the veto area,” she said, “because actually, what people are looking for is dialogue. They’re also looking for clear information … clarity of information, dialogue, to be listened to.

“You have your voice, you have to be heard; none of us have a veto. None of us have a veto. That’s not how democratic processes of decision-making and planning work.” 

The palpable tension in that exchange notwithstanding, it seems for now that while the full-on anti-asylum and anti-immigration tendency has made some inroads in local politics, it still has little foothold at the nationwide parliamentary level.

That makes a marked difference from other European countries like the UK, France and Germany, where heavily anti-immigration parties win large chunks of the national vote without getting into government.

ADVERTISEMENT

And on the judicial front, efforts to block accommodation for asylum seekers are not yet making much headway. This week, a judge rejected a case seeking to stop applicants being housed in a hotel in the small community of Dundrum, County Tipperary, which has previously served as a temporary home for Ukrainian refugees. 

The petition, wrote the judge, claimed “that International Protection Applicants are more likely to be burglars than those staying as guests at the hotel or Ukrainian refugees staying there. I lend no weight to that assertion.” 

Meanwhile, the High Court in Dublin ruled that the Irish government has breached the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights by failing to provide shelter and basic necessities to asylum seekers, many of whom remain camped out on the streets because there is nowhere to accommodate them.

These judgments will not soothe the inflamed tensions. Clashes between police and angry residents in various communities are getting more attention in the mainstream media, while an online ecosystem of right-wing Irish outlets and influencers is growing its audience.

ADVERTISEMENT

All the while, Sinn Fein, which not long ago looked like a government in waiting, is grappling with the fact that the socially liberal segment of the younger generation may not be enough to put them ahead of the establishment — and that a significant number of the anti-establishment working-class voters they once counted on may be turning away from them just as they thought they were within reach of power.

Source link

#Sinn #Fein #claw #Irish #votes #antiimmigrant #anger #rises

Why Ireland’s leaders are willing to be tougher on Israel than most

A long anti-colonial history and specific recent incidents mean Irish-Israeli relations are noticeably strained by European standards.

ADVERTISEMENT

Like other European countries, Ireland is watching in horror as thousands of people are killed in Gaza, knowing that among them are likely to be some of its own citizens.

One particularly shocking case stands out: that of Emily Hand, an eight-year-old girl who was thought to have been killed by Hamas terrorists at a kibbutz during the massacre on 7 October. 

Her father was initially informed of her likely death, but DNA tests have indicated her body was not among the remains recovered from the kibbutz. 

She is now thought to be alive and held hostage in Gaza, providing the Irish government with an imperative to secure her release – if at all possible – requiring intense diplomatic work as fighting rages in Gaza. 

But at home in Ireland, Hand’s case is part of a complicated political reality. While many European governments have hesitated to condemn Israel’s bombardment of Gaza – if they have criticised it at all – many Irish leaders have taken a noticeably tougher tone.

The Irish Taoiseach (prime minister), Leo Varadkar, has repeatedly condemned the Hamas massacre of 1,400 people in Israel, but has also said that Israel’s response in Gaza resembles “something more approaching revenge“.

At an international aid conference for Gaza hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris on Thursday, Varadkar said that failure to observe humanitarian law “can’t be inconsequential”.

Ireland’s President Michael D Higgins, meanwhile, has accused Benjamin Netanyahu’s government of nothing less than undermining international human rights norms.

“To announce in advance that you will break international law and to do so on an innocent population, it reduces all the code that was there from Second World War on protection of civilians and it reduces it to tatters,” Higgins said in mid-October as the air campaign in Gaza began to claim increasingly more civilian lives.

His remarks were criticised by the Israeli ambassador in Dublin, Dana Erlich, who accused him of being misinformed and suggested that Israel’s overall impression of Ireland was one of unconscious anti-Israeli bias.

Another Israeli diplomat in Dublin posted their criticism on X: “Ireland wondering who funded those tunnels of terror? A short investigation direction – 1. Find a mirror 2. Direct it to yourself 3. Voilà.” The post has since been clarified and disowned.

Higgins has also been critical of EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, whom he said was “reckless” in her initial pro-Israeli response to the outbreak of war. 

He continues to call for a humanitarian ceasefire, and for international independent verification of the death toll in Gaza – a number currently reported only by the Hamas-run health ministry.

So while many Western European governments remain in near-lockstep, why are Ireland’s leaders noticeably more ambivalent in their public statements about Israel’s actions?

Long memories

For one thing, the two countries have not had the warmest relationship over the last two decades. In 2010, it was revealed that agents of Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, had used counterfeited passports to travel undercover to Dubai, where they assassinated a Hamas leader

Among their forged travel documents were Irish passports, including some using stolen genuine passport numbers.

The episode put a chill on Irish-Israeli relations, one that marks the relationship to this day. At the time, Irish ministers warned that Mossad’s actions may have put Irish travellers at risk. But six years after the incident, the then-Israeli ambassador to Ireland declined to guarantee that the same thing would not happen again.

On both sides of the border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, many Irish nationalists have identified with the Palestinian cause for decades, seeing in it a parallel with their own resistance to military violence from the British state. 

ADVERTISEMENT

This resonance is still felt today. Sinn Fein, the largest and oldest party that advocates for Irish reunification, is widely expected to lead the next government in Dublin, and its leader, Mary Lou McDonald, has made her views on Israel abundantly clear.

In 2021, during a major outbreak of Israeli-Palestinian violence, she told parliament that Israel needed to be condemned as a “racist, apartheid regime”, and grounded her call for Palestinian statehood in the grand narrative of Irish history.

But as independent Irish Senator Tom Clonan, himself a former military officer, told Euronews, while Ireland’s experience of colonisation makes it something of an outlier in Western Europe, most of its politicians or population do not take a negative view of Israel’s existence.

“Irish people support Israel and believe in the legitimacy of the state of Israel,” he said. 

“We have strong links in terms of trade, and there’s a large diaspora of Irish Israelis. Chaim Herzog, the president of Israel for most of the 1980s, was an Irish-Israeli who grew up in Dublin! What we’re critical of are the actions of the Netanyahu government.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Hamas committed truly genocidal attacks on October 7th, breaking all the laws around armed conflict, which it continues to do in Gaza. But at the same time, the Israeli military has failed to provide safe passage to the elderly, the sick, pregnant women and so on, as they are required to under the Geneva Conventions. Forcibly expelling civilians from their homes, firing on hospitals and schools and civilian areas – all of that and more is prohibited.

“That’s what Varadkar was referring to: proportionality of response, which is an objective standard in the law of conflict. In fairness to the British, for instance, when the IRA was setting off bombs in the UK and murdering innocent civilians, including children, the UK government didn’t order air strikes on republican neighbourhoods in Belfast!”

Actions beyond the pale

Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald has condemned Hamas’ attack, but is also criticising Israel for “ignoring” calls for a ceasefire. And like party leaders to the left of Sinn Fein, she is also calling for the Israeli ambassador in Dublin to be expelled because of Israel’s actions since 7 October. 

Varadkar has rejected that call, pointing out that not even the Russian ambassador has been expelled and warning that to eject Erlich would “disempower” Dublin as it tries to get 40-odd Irish citizens out of Gaza.

Varadkar’s partners in the coalition, centre-right party Fianna Fáil, meanwhile hosted Erlich at their annual party conference last weekend. Her appearance was met with outrage on the left, but party leader and current foreign secretary Micheál Martin defended the government’s decision not to expel her, pointing out that to do so would likely result in Ireland’s own ambassador being expelled from Israel just as they try to save Emily Hand and the other Irish citizens trapped in the crossfire.

ADVERTISEMENT

All the while, Ireland’s voice in Europe remains a distinctive one. Clonan suggests that since Ireland has itself been through a difficult peace process at home, its leaders are perhaps particularly alert to double standards when it comes to the protection of civilians in conflict.

“I was very dismayed when Ursula von der Leyen travelled to Tel Aviv and gave absolutely unqualified support for Israel,” he says. “It must be remembered that when Russia targeted the electricity network in Ukraine, she said that hitting civilian targets there was a war crime.

“I would encourage her to reflect on that, and look at Israel’s actions through that prism as well.”



Source link

#Irelands #leaders #tougher #Israel