EXCLUSIVE: Sanjay Gupta bats for REDUCTION of star fees in post pandemic times: “Aapko Rs. 100 crores lene hai toh lo, lekin aap Rs. 150 crores ka dhanda toh kara lo” : Bollywood News – Bollywood Hungama

Bollywood Hungama recently reported that Sanjay Gupta’s upcoming films will skip a theatrical release and premiere on a digital platform directly. We exclusively spoke to the popular producer-director about this, the box office scenario at present and a lot more.

EXCLUSIVE: Sanjay Gupta bats for REDUCTION of star fees in post pandemic times: “Aapko Rs. 100 crores lene hai toh lo, lekin aap Rs. 150 crores ka dhanda toh kara lo”

You recently announced that you’ll be releasing Fardeen Khan-Riteish Deshmukh starrer Visfot and your directorial venture, starring Harshvardhan Rane and Meezan Jafri directly on OTT. Could you tell us the reason behind it?
After the first lockdown, we all were wondering ‘Now what?’. Those six months were very tough. Then the second lockdown took place. I was clear that the cinema going experience is going to change forever. I saw it coming two years back. While that happens and while we figure out, which we are still trying to figure out, we had a bunch of stories and we developed them during the two lockdowns. Through video calls, I interacted with my different teams of writers. We created a lot of these projects and we were clear that it’ll go straight to digital. We shot those films accordingly. So, from day 1, it was decided that these will be OTT releases. But in today’s scenario, my producing partner might tell me that we might have to release the film in theatres due to contractual obligations. But that’s not happened at least till now.

Nevertheless, despite these films are for digital, they are very cinematic. A lot of the content created in India in Hindi which is released directly on the OTT platforms is not cinematic. Usme woh bade parde waali baat nahin hai. I don’t see these films and be like ‘I wish I had seen this in the theatre’. I am trying to bridge that gap in my films. When you’ll watch (Visfot or my directorial venture), you’ll remark ‘Yeh bade parde ki picture main chote parde pe dekh raha hoon’.

When will these two films be out?
It’ll be released in the first half of 2023.

A lot of films, even those starring big names, flopped at the box office recently. A section of the industry is hence asking for price correction and reduction in star fees. Do you think that it’s a fair point?
Yes, it is an extremely fair point. Paying a huge fee to the actor was not unfair as they used to guarantee certain footfalls. But if that is not happening now, it is unfair to ask for those prices. Somewhere, the correction has to take place. We are working out a mechanism where the idea should be that if you are getting the footfall, then you can take your money. But don’t take your money if you are not getting the desired footfall. So, in my opinion, the payment will have to be more performance-based. Aapko Rs. 100 crores lene hai toh lo, lekin aap Rs. 150 crores ka dhanda toh kara lo. Or else, if you want Rs. 100 crores as your fees, make sure that the film’s digital rights are sold for Rs. 80 or 90 crores. Then I am willing to bet. And most practical producers are adopting a simple approach – your COP (cost of production) should be what you earn from digital. It’s as simple as that. Because the theatrical scenario is quite unpredictable like never before and ever since cinema was born. I’d say that if the gamble pays off, actors can keep 80% of the share. No problem with that. Because you have earned it. But if the numbers are not there, then it’s unfair that the actor’s fees are coming out of the producer’s pocket.

Nowadays, it’s also said that the music is not working. Do you agree?
It’s a catch-22. Earlier, we were consuming music from the music channels. Now we are watching songs on YouTube and usually, it’s a one-time watch. Which was the last song that you went and saw for the second or third time? It might be for a rare hit song like say ‘Manike’.

But aren’t people still watching songs on TV? The BARC reports indicate that music channels have a lot of viewership…
I don’t know but what I do know is that we are not spending for playing on these channels. Also, we are not advertising as actively as we did. We are not promoting the film as we used to. And then we are saying ‘filmon mein music nahin hai’.

EXCLUSIVE Sanjay Gupta bats for REDUCTION of star fees in post pandemic times

I guess the songs are there in the film but don’t have a shelf life. An exception is ‘Kesariya’ from Brahmastra, which became a big hit as it was a soulful number, a rarity in today’s times…
Yes, true. But the director’s last film Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani (2013) had seven blockbuster songs. He’s now delivering just one blockbuster song. Shayad utni mehnat humne bhi karna bandh kar di hai. In my opinion, movies are remembered by their music. Nobody remembers actors or directors or stories as much as you remember songs.

Almost all your films have had some great songs which are fondly remembered even today…
Even my next film has some good numbers. We have worked hard on it. Visfot, however, has no songs (as per the requirement of the story). My directorial film has two young heroes and heroines and is based in Goa. It has youthful numbers. I can’t think of making a film without music. Zinda (2006) had no music but is one of my best albums. Dus Kahaniyaan (2007) had no songs, except for the title song in the end credits. But it has one of the best albums from White Feather Films. I used to always have a double disc, consisting of the club version and the lounge version. Dus Kahaniyaan had a triple disc. Besides club and lounge versions, there was one more CD comprising 10 poems, written by Gulzar and it was inspired by the ten stories. These poems were narrated by different actors from Shabana ji to Naseer saab to Sanju to Nana Patekar to Dia Mirza etc. And it had Bappa Lahiri’s music as well.

You have also announced Shootout 3. What’s the latest update and have you signed any actors?
That is a call Ekta Kapoor has to take. And no, we haven’t approached any of the actors yet. We are still finalizing the script. It was written during the first lockdown. Between then and now, a lot has changed. Ekta is also involved creatively and we are revisiting the script. As soon as the script gets updated, we’ll go ahead.

I believe in all you are coming up with 5 films, out of which you are directing 2 films…
There’s a lot that has been lined up for the next 2-3 years. White Feather Films is going to be extremely active as we are working with a string of directors and coming out with multiple films. One by one, we’ll keep releasing them. 2022 was busy as we completed 2 films. We want to keep the momentum going and hence, there’ll be a lot more happening in 2023.

Also Read: Sanjay Gupta confirms that Fardeen Khan’s comeback film Visfot, co-starring Riteish Deshmukh, will skip theatrical release and premiere directly on an OTT platform

More Pages: Visfot Box Office Collection

BOLLYWOOD NEWS – LIVE UPDATES

Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood Live News Today & upcoming movies 2022 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.

Source link

#EXCLUSIVE #Sanjay #Gupta #bats #REDUCTION #star #fees #post #pandemic #times #Aapko #crores #lene #hai #toh #lekin #aap #crores #dhanda #toh #kara #Bollywood #News #Bollywood #Hungama

Review: ‘Avatar: The Way of Water’ is a Must-See Cinematic Adventure

Review: ‘Avatar: The Way of Water’ is a Must-See Cinematic Adventure

by Manuel São Bento
December 16, 2022

James Cameron is arguably one of the most influential filmmakers in movie history. He’s also considered the sequel master – Aliens and Terminator 2: Judgment Day remain two of the best sequels ever made – and he’s one of the leading artists behind the technological evolution within this respective art, it would be absurd to not have Avatar: The Way of Water as one of your most anticipated films of the year. As a fan of the original, expectations for the continuation of the saga – which will have at least three more movies in addition to this one – were very high, and, for the most part, they were fulfilled… for better and for worse.

Regarding Avatar (2009): I don’t know the reasons behind the “popular to hate” and “does anyone care?” trend that emerged a few years ago. The truth is that I hadn’t reviewed the original for a long time, so I was curious to know how much my opinion had changed. After rewatching it the day before the sequel, I couldn’t have been more positively surprised. The visuals remain incredible even 13 years later. The score has never ceased to be memorably epic, and contrary to one of the points used to contest the film’s cultural impact, I remembered the story and characters perfectly.

Having written all this, The Way of Water lives up to my predictions. Technically, it’s practically impossible to point out any flaw. The same cannot be said about the sequel’s script, written by James Cameron, Rick Jaffa, and Amanda Silver. Do I consider this the typical case of “quality over substance”? No. There are easily distinguishable themes, clear intentions, and important messages to convey. However, the levels of creativity, innovation, and dedication are so high on the technical side that the story suffers in comparison.

It doesn’t matter much if I start with discussing the visuals, sound, score, or any other element of this type, as they all stand out in a truly spectacular manner. Curiously, the visual effects in The Way of Water have been the most complimented feature – and the reasons are more than valid, of course – but for me personally, the sound design & sound mixing deserve the same amount of praise, especially in the aquatic environment, that is, in the water or under it. The movie may be 95% CGI, but the sound work is so immersive that viewers will easily forget that they are, in fact, watching a film.

Whether it’s the water splashing against rocks, giant waves lapping, underwater animals communicating, characters spattering on the surface, or moving around in the water, the sound design detail is astonishing – certain moments seem like they’re straight out of the iconic Blue Planet docu-series. Simon Franglen’s score compliments the original, the late James Horner’s score for the first Avatar, keeping the melodies and classic notes that impacted me so much in 2009. It contains all the chill-inducing characteristics that a blockbuster of this dimension requires, elevating stunning shots and adrenaline-charged action set pieces.

Avatar: The Way of Water Review

Of course, The Way of Water’s visuals are absolutely mesmerizing, too. The movie can be referenced as perfectly undeniable, incontestable proof that CGI can be an essential supplement in cinema and even the primary visual engine of an entire film. What Cameron has managed to create underwater is unbelievable, and it’s in this subaquatic environment that new technology and innovative filmmaking methods come into play. However, the Holy Grail is in the so-called “performance capture”.

As of this release, no other movie matches The Way of Water when it comes to capturing facial expressions in motion-capture renderings – which is saying a lot when Planet of the Apes and The Lord of the Rings did it so well, and the superhero genre constantly uses this technique as well. Contrary to what happens in other films, the simple fact that viewers are able to analyze the actors’ performances as if they were ordinary live-action interpretations is impressive in and of itself. Emotions are palpable through a mere look or posture in an incomparable manner to what Hollywood is producing elsewhere. The Oscar for Best Visual Effects is more than certain an well-deserved.

That said, The Way of Water is less impressive than the original work. In 2009, everything belonged to the “never seen before” category: the special use of 3D, the quality of CGI and performance capture, the creation of Pandora… every aspect of the first movie was shocking. Nothing left me in that state during the sequel, and I’m afraid the general audience might feel the same way. Is it visually striking? Undoubtedly. But not to the point of being a unique, unrepeatable experience. It’s “simply” a film with CGI prepared, tweaked, and tested over an entire decade, so obviously, it’s expected to look phenomenal.

The underwater sequences themselves will only truly impress more knowledgeable viewers, as without some research beforehand or acquaintance with what Cameron has brought new to the industry, this environment will just look like “great CGI”. Hence, I seriously disagree with the common go to line many journalists are using to try and get quoted: “The Way of Water surpasses the original in every way.” Any blockbuster of today has better visuals than most movies from decades past, so it’s unfair and even misleading to directly compare technical aspects individually and outside the context of the time of release, as this would mean that virtually all recent films are better than the originals.

In short, The Way of Water is a must-see movie on the biggest movie screen possible. It’s an experience that must be lived in a massive screening room with a giant screen, where the entertainment value increases tremendously. And don’t let the previous paragraphs deceive you: it’s one of the most visually immersive films of the century. To provoke such a feeling in the viewers, the cast is crucial. It’s hard to single out any one actor, however: Zoe Saldaña (Neytiri), Kate Winslet (Ronal), Sam Worthington (Jake Sully), and Sigourney Weaver (Kiri) all embody their characters superbly, with the first obliterating the others in terms of expressiveness and her emotional scale.

And it’s precisely in the characterization and development of each character that the movie shines, apart from all the technicalities. With the introduction of Jake and Neytiri’s children, The Way of Water could easily get lost with the amount of distinct, individual arcs. However, the concepts of family and parental protection are well explored through Jake and Neytiri’s uncertainty and fear, but also through Neteyam’s (Jamie Flatters) respect for this father, Lo’ak’s (Britain Dalton) search for validation, Tuk’s (Trinity Jo-Li Bliss) innocence, and Kiri’s spiritual connection to water.

Avatar: The Way of Water Review

The Way of Water delves into some characters more than others, but all receive proper attention during the just-over-three-hours runtime – Neytiri is the only one who ends up, unfortunately, having less screentime compared to others, but the last act compensates for her somewhat strange absence during the second hour. Jake’s different treatment of his eldest son, compared to Lo’ak, is quite relatable, being the most captivating common storyline of the entire film. I was emotionally invested in the stories of each of the Sully family members throughout the entire movie.

The same cannot be said about Kiri’s arc, though. Honestly, while the character has a distinctive personality and, in many ways, is the film’s spiritual soul, The Way of Water uses her too much as an object whose purpose is to demonstrate the $400M budget to the audience. Surely, this wasn’t Cameron’s intention, but considering that weaknesses are presented and quickly forgotten, as well as a few other storytelling details, it seems that the filmmaker occasionally gets lost amidst his extreme commitment to the technical areas.

In the end, the main problem with The Way of Water is its central plot. In addition to some logical issues raised by some character decisions, the real obstacle is the predictability and repetition of generic narrative points. Cameron, Jaffa, and Silver recycle a lot from the original, borrowing its structure, antagonist, and even many of its themes. Stephen Lang returns as Colonel Miles Quaritch and even has an intriguing angle but one that falls into the usual developments without any unexpected turns.

Honestly, I believe this sequel serves more as a reminder than a true continuation of the story presented 13 years ago. An attempt to “test the waters” by putting the audience through a similar experience to convince studios that it’s really worth investing in such an expensive saga. This perspective is understandable, but it’s difficult to hide the partial disappointment felt when leaving The Way of Water without being astounded at any point throughout the entire narrative.

However, Cameron’s Avatar: The Way of Water is still efficient in everything it does. The story revolves around Jake wanting to protect his family at all costs, following a path filled with tough lessons to learn and complex obstacles to overcome. Running away from your problems is never the right decision, and the screenplay tackles this topic in many satisfying ways. A final remark on the action: while I prefer the third act of the original in this regard, the energy, stunt work, and overall effects of the various sequences offer some of the best entertainment you can witnesss all year. Impeccable work.

Final Thoughts

Avatar: The Way of Water clearly sets itself apart from many other blockbusters, building on 13 years of preparation to deliver a memorable CINEMA experience. A visually, technically breathtaking adventure, particularly in the truly stunning underwater sequences. The score remains epic, and the authentic dynamic between the members of the Sully family helps viewers to be emotionally invested in them. The entire cast’s performances, namely Zoe Saldaña, are vital for the film’s success. Too bad the recycled, generic narrative doesn’t keep up with the creativity, dedication, and innovation levels allocated to the technical elements. Underwhelming to the point of making the three-hour runtime feel heavier than it should, but for fans of the original – which remains supreme – it’s far from ruining one of the year’s must-see theater experiences.

Manuel’s Rating: B+
Follow Manuel on Twitter – @msbreviews / Or Letterboxd – @msbreviews

Find more posts: Review, Sci-Fi



Source link

#Review #Avatar #Water #MustSee #Cinematic #Adventure

Research: 2022 TV Offered Record-High Depiction of Barriers to Abortion Access

Midway through this year, the reproductive rights of folks with uteruses living in the U.S. suffered a cataclysmic regression when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June. Now, with at least 33 million Americans without access to safe abortion care, how has this seismic change in our reality been reflected in entertainment? This is the central question of the latest study from Abortions Onscreen, a research initiative from the University of California San Francisco’s Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH). 

The fifth annual report “Abortions Onscreen in 2022” documents several key discoveries, including a continued trend of increased abortion portrayals on TV, with 60 abortion plotlines or mentions from 52 different TV shows, a notable spike from 47 plotlines from 42 shows in 2021. This year’s edition also saw a historic first in abortion representation: one third of plotlines (33%) depict logistical barriers that patients face when accessing safe abortion. While these stats may sound encouraging, Abortions Onscreen concludes that TV continued to misrepresent abortion patients demographically, tellings stories of characters who are whiter and wealthier than real-life counterparts. 

The study’s method involves researchers watching each scripted or reality series containing abortion, analyzing them by the metrics abortion of safety, the demographics of characters seeking abortions, type of abortion, reasons for obtaining abortions, and the difficulty or ease with which abortion care is accessed. The type of abortion content is categorized as either a joke, consideration, discussion, or an entire plotline on the procedure. The trends are then compared with the on-screen depictions from prior years, per the study design.

In terms of series genres, Abortion Onscreen discovered that 50% of abortion plotlines occurred on dramas, with comedies (19%), medical dramas (11%), and reality television (7%) following behind.

The report records 20 storylines that portray the contemporary obstacles to access that patients face, including long distance drives to clinics, such as the “Jackson” episode of “P-Valley,” and gestational limits, as seen on drama series “Pretty Little Liars: Original Sin” and reality program “Life After Lockup.” Abortion Onscreen found that illegality remains most commonly portrayed barrier (40%), in keeping with previous analyses.

“Prior to the 2022 television season, the majority of characters who obtained abortions on television did so with few of the legal, financial, or logistical barriers that plague abortion access in the United States,” the report reminds us. “Importantly, several of these plotlines included compounding barriers, like portraying a character who needs to travel across state lines for abortion care while also raising the money to pay for the abortion, negotiating time off work, and arranging for childcare.”

The on-screen representation of barriers is not without its problematic elements, though. Characters seeking abortions in “FBI: Most Wanted” and “Law & Order,” for example, either die or kill others in the process of obtaining an abortion, the report points out. “Whether intentional or not, this equates abortion both with death and criminal behavior,” the study emphasizes.

Based on their analysis, Abortion Onscreen confirms that TV depictions of abortion continue to distort the demographic reality of abortion patients. The study reports a 58% majority of white cisgender women characters seeking care, though they make up only about one-third of abortion patients in the country. This figure is compared with eight plotlines (23%) that include Black characters either obtaining or disclosing past abortions, which is a historic high but still fails to represent the Black folks who make up 33% of the total patient population.

What the report finds “most disappointing” in such misrepresentation is its erasure of BIPOC, economically disadvantaged folks who are disproportionately impacted by barriers to abortion access. “On television, the vast majority (80%) of characters who faced barriers to abortion care were white and portrayed as middle class (45%) or wealthy (35%), a distinct departure from real life in which the majority of patients who face barriers to abortion care identify as people of color and are living at or below the Federal Poverty Line,” the report details.

Despite the strides made in TV by way of coverage and visibility of abortion care, Abortion Onscreen’s report suggests that not all representation is good representation. There remains blindspots in these portrayals, opportunities to validate the lived experiences of the most marginalized abortion patients by prioritizing their stories: “We hope these shows and others continue to build on these depictions by giving main characters abortion plotlines instead of only guest actors and working to reflect the reality of abortion patients in the U.S,” the report emphasizes.

“Television and film help people make sense of the world,” lead researcher Steph Herold told The 19th. “It’s important to know what messages the media are conveying about abortion, particularly right now in such a politically precarious moment for abortion rights.” 

Highlights from the “Abortion Onscreen in 2022” report are below. To see the complete list of abortion on scripted and reality TV, read the full report here.


  • We documented at least 60 abortion plotlines or mentions over the course of January-December 2022 from 52 distinct television shows, outnumbering 2021 (47 abortion plotlines in 42 shows) and any previous year. Half (50%) of these plotlines occurred on dramas (including eight foreign dramas), with abortion plotlines on comedies (19%), medical dramas (11%), and reality television (7%) contributing as well. Below, we analyze themes across these plotlines and how they comport both with the reality of abortion access and past representations.
  • In a historic first, one third of plotlines portrayed barriers to abortion access. This year, we documented at least twenty plotlines (33%) that portrayed some of the more common barriers to abortion care. Most notably, we documented more plotlines than ever before portraying contemporary obstacles to abortion care and the overwhelmingly negative impact they have on patients, including long distance drives to abortion clinics (“P-Valley,” “FBI: Most Wanted,” “Grey’s Anatomy,” “New Amsterdam,” “Law & Order,” “Life After Lockup”), gestational limits (“Pretty Little Liars,” “FBI: Most Wanted,” “Law & Order,” “Life After Lockup,” “Grey’s Anatomy”) and even the first ever depiction of an abortion fund volunteer (“Law & Order”).
  • Our previous research found that the most commonly portrayed barrier is illegality, and our analysis this year comports with that finding. Of this year’s plotlines that do depict barriers, the most commonly portrayed one was still illegality (on eight plotlines, about 40%).
  • Abortion patients on television continue to misrepresent abortion patients demographically, especially when it comes to who faces barriers to care. Television has long misrepresented who gets abortions, choosing to tell the stories of characters who are whiter and wealthier than their real life counterparts. This trend remains the same for the 2022 abortion plotlines; of the characters who obtained abortions, the majority (58%) were white cisgender women. This is about 10% fewer white characters than in 2021, yet in reality, white women make up only about one-third of the abortion patient population in the U.S.
  • Past patterns of demographic discrepancies between onscreen representations and real abortion patients persist as in years past; the majority (59%) of abortion patients are parenting at the time of their abortion, whereas only 18% of this year’s abortion plotlines included characters raising children at the time of their abortion. This continues to erase the very common experience of parents who obtain abortions, and perpetuates the false dichotomy between raising children and having abortions.
  • Television plotlines continue to feature few portrayals of common abortion methods. Medication abortion makes up more than half of all U.S. abortions, yet only 4 plotlines (6%) specifically portrayed a character having an abortion by pill. Of those, both Station 19 and Grey’s Anatomy included dialogue from clinician characters stating the accurate abortion pill protocol, which may contribute to increased knowledge among viewers about medication abortion. No plotlines portrayed characters safely self-managing an abortion with pills.

Source link

#Research #Offered #RecordHigh #Depiction #Barriers #Abortion #Access

Todd & Julie Chrisley Slam Daughter Chloe’s Biological Mom – Insisting She Has ‘No Rights’ To The 10-Year-Old! – Perez Hilton

Todd & Julie Chrisley are making it crystal clear that Chloe Chrisley‘s biological mother has no legal rights to the 10-year-old!

As we previously reported, the pair adopted the daughter of their estranged son Kyle Chrisley back in 2016 after her biological mom lost custody. Angela Johnson gave up her rights after being arrested for allegedly filing a false application for Medicaid, making it easy for a judge to grant custody to the Chrisleys. But after Todd and Julie were sentenced to 12 and 7 years, respectively, for tax fraud, the math changed.

Related: Lindsie Says She’s ‘Heartbroken And Devastated’ About Parents’ Prison Sentence

Angela shared with TMZ her intentions “to go back to court” and regain custody of Chloe. The Chrisley Knows Best star clapped back at the mother, telling People in a statement:

“Todd and Julie are saddened by the unfortunate and misleading narrative currently being portrayed in the media regarding Chloe.”

A pointed but rather tame response, considering. But Todd and Julie aren’t holding back their feelings on the matter now! During an episode of their Chrisley Confessions podcast on Wednesday, the couple slammed Angela’s efforts to get custody again, this time with some real teeth! First, they say they haven’t heard from her since 2017:

“It’s ironic that her biological mother would come forward now when she has not been in her life since 2015. Angela Johnson surrendered her parental rights on March of 2017, and we never heard from her again. Chloe was legally adopted by myself and by Julie. She is legally our child. We will be the ones who decide, if and when the time comes, as to who will be her caregiver. We’re not going to discuss who that’s going to be, because we don’t owe that to the world and that’s our private matters. At the end of the day, Chloe’s family is who Chloe has been raised with.”

On the one hand that seems fair, but also… they didn’t complain when Angela’s legal troubles caused her to lose custody. Should the same happen here?

Not according to Todd! While the family is going through a tough time after Julie and Todd’s sentencing and now this potential custody battle, the 53-year-old reality star vowed to make sure the child’s life is “unaltered” as much as possible:

“Chloe is a very bright, intelligent, charismatic, funny, beautiful child, who has a heart of compassion. Her life is going to be as unaltered as it possibly can be based on what Julie and I have the ability to control.”

Focusing the conversation back on Angela, Todd stressed that she has zero rights to Chloe since she gave them up five years ago:

“Angela Johnson, she literally surrendered her rights to her child. She did this in front of a judge. The judge explained to her, ‘You understand what you’re doing? You understand that you’re surrendering the rights to your child?’ And then explained that she had x amount of days to come back in and rescind that. [The judge] asked her in the hearing that day, ‘Has anyone promised you anything financial? Has anyone threatened you?’ The answer to all of that is no and that’s in writing. It’s in a court document. We’re not posting court documents because they are supposed to be private.”

He then insisted:

“Just so the record is very, very clear. Angela Johnson has no rights to Chloe. Her rights were terminated. She has been legally adopted.”

Although Angela gave up her “rights” to the kid, Todd alleged he and Julie have attempted to have a relationship with the mom, even going as far as to give her money, a home, a car, and funds to attend nursing school:

“We tried to do the right thing with Angela. We provided her housing for her to get on her feet at some point when she was homeless. I did not want to have to say to Chloe when she was 18 years old that I allowed her mother to be in the streets. I did not owe this to her mother. I did not owe this to go out here and provide housing for her. All the woman had to do was pay the $258 a month in the HOA fee for the condo we bought for her to live in until Chloe was 18 years old. At that point, the condo would’ve reverted back to Chloe and Chloe could’ve done whatever she wanted to with it.”

He continued:

“She could’ve allowed Angela to live there or she could’ve sold it and done what she wanted to with the money. The woman would not even pay the $258 a month. I’ve given this woman money to go to school for nursing, only to find out that she never completed any of it. She was just using us for the money.”

Seems quite generous if true! Sorry if we don’t consider Todd Chrisley a very reliable source anymore…

Furthermore, Todd claimed that Angela would not show up to see Chloe when she did have joint custody with the television personalities — leading them to move forward with the adoption:

“When she didn’t have a car in the initial beginning, when we got joint custody of Chloe with Angela, Angela didn’t have a car that would get her back and forth. We bought her a car, a Toyota Prius, and gave it to her free and clear for her to be able to meet Julie every other week in Commerce, which was halfway, Commerce, Georgia. She wouldn’t show up half the time. She would never even call and tell us that she wasn’t showing up. Julie would drive that hour and a half there, sit and wait in the parking lot for 45 minutes. She wouldn’t answer the phone. We didn’t know anything. And then I would tell Julie, ‘Bring her back home.’ That’s what prompted us to move forward with the adoption.”

While Angela claimed to TMZ she was “pushed out of” Chloe’s life, Todd asserted on the podcast that wasn’t true:

“Angela terminated her rights voluntarily. She wasn’t threatened. She wasn’t coerced. And then for me to see… that she’s now trying to squeeze out five minutes of fame out of herself to put herself back out here. What she needs to do is spend more time trying to find a better wig and less time trying to go out here and get more time on the camera.”

The podcast host then concluded his rant about the situation by threatening Angela that they’ve kept all their communication from over the years and will release them if they have to:

“I know you listen to this, Angela. What you need to do is understand that I have retained every text message, and so does Julie, with any communication that we’ve ever had with you. We have not released those, but if we need to we will. That’s just drawing our line in the sand. You have had no relationship with Chloe. She does not have any relationship with you. You’ve never reached out to talk to her. You’ve never sent her a Christmas gift or a birthday gift. You’ve never done anything for her.”

Whoa…

At this time, Angela has not filed any documents but told TMZ she’s “in the process of getting some legal papers” submitted. We’ll have to see what happens next with this situation, but it sounds like Todd and Julie aren’t going down without a fight. For now, though, Chloe and her 16-year-old brother Grayson Chrisley will remain in the custody of Savannah Chrisley.

Thoughts on the situation, Perezcious readers? Let us know in the comments.

[Image via USA Network/Entertainment Tonight/TMZ/YouTube]

Source link

#Todd #Julie #Chrisley #Slam #Daughter #Chloes #Biological #Mom #Insisting #Rights #10YearOld #Perez #Hilton

‘Wednesday’ On Netflix: Update On Season 2 News & More You Need To Know

It’s Wednesday Addams’ world, and we’re just living in it. Jenna Ortega takes on the beloved role in the Netflix series Wednesday, which was released on November 23. Wednesday made a splash with the biggest opening week ever on Netflix for an English language series. After the show officially crossed one billion hours watched in three weeks, Netflix executive Peter Friedlander revealed that he feels “optimistic” about a season 2.

The opening credits were unveiled on November 8, just a few weeks before the show’s premiere. Christina Ricci also revealed EXCLUSIVELY to HollywoodLife how she feels about Jenna’s performance as the character she once played. Emma Myers also told HollywoodLife what to expect from Wednesday’s roommate, Enid Sinclair.

The key art for ‘Wednesday.’ (Netflix)

“Wednesday is currently a teenager, and we’ve never seen her as a teenager before,” Jenna said in a statement. “Her snarky, snide remarks might not necessarily sound as charming when they’re coming from somebody who should probably know better than a 10-year-old girl. That was a balancing act. We didn’t want to make her sound like every other teenage girl, but we also didn’t want to make her too ignorant. And we’ve never seen her on screen this much. Any other time you’ve seen Wednesday, she’s been the one-liner, the end of a joke, she always hits it, and I think that’s what people really love about her. But in this show, every scene is Wednesday. There’s an opportunity to give her a bit more dimension, and she becomes a bit more of a real person, which I don’t think we’ve ever seen before.”

While there have been so many depictions of the Addams Family, none have ever focused solely on Wednesday — until now. HollywoodLife has all the latest updates about Netflix’s Wednesday, including what we know about its release date, cast, and more.

Will There Be A Wednesday Season 2?

With the show’s massive debut, fans are already wondering about season 2. Netflix has not officially announced whether or not Wednesday will return for season 2, but it’s practically a sure thing.

Wednesday showrunner Miles Millar revealed that he and co-showrunner Alfred Gough already have plans for multiple seasons. “For us, it’s always looking at the future, and when we sit down to create a show, it’s looking at multiple seasons, ideally,” Miles told Variety. “That’s never expected, but that’s the anticipation that hopefully the show is successful. So you always lay out at least three or four seasons’ worth of potential storylines for the characters. It can evolve and change. Often, you want to see which characters or cast pop and who you like to write for. So you want to keep it open and organic enough to change it and evolve, but we certainly have a pretty clear runway of what we want to do in future seasons.”

Peter Friedlander, head of Netflix’s U.S. and Canada scripted series, spoke to Variety in December 2022 about season 2. “You may know what I’m going to say — but I have nothing to confirm at this time. I am optimistic about ‘Wednesday.’ We’ll leave it at that,” he said. Peter also called the series a “cultural phenomenon” and acknowledged how much it’s blown up. “The resurgence, for me, it’s something that’s been in the culture for a long time — but never this pronounced,” he said. “It’s something that we want to study and understand why this is such a phenomenon.”

HollywoodLife spoke EXCLUSIVELY with Hunter Doohan, who plays Tyler, about what he’d to see from his character. Tyler was last seen about to Hyde out while chained up in an armored car. “I just want to explore what’s next for Tyler, and if he’s going to come back after Wednesday,” he told HL. “I guess the idea left at the end is that he’s really pissed off enough to transform in that armed vehicle and I assume escape.”

What Is Wednesday Based On?

Wednesday, like the rest of her frightening family members, was created by cartoonist Charles Addams for illustrations in The New Yorker, starting in the 1930s. The Addams Family consists of Gomez and Morticia Addams, their children Wednesday and Pugsley, other family members Uncle Fester and Grandmama, and their butler Lurch. They are depicted as a wealthy but odd aristocratic family who doesn’t care that other people perceive them as frightening and scary. The Addams Family has been adapted over the years into countless media projects, including the ’90s film franchise that featured Christina as Wednesday. For the 2019 animated film and its sequel, Wednesday was voiced by Chloë Grace Moretz. There was also a Broadway show based on the Addams family that starred Nathan Lane and Bebe Neuwirth and was nominated for two Tony Awards. The Addams family truly has had a massive impact on pop culture.

Wednesday Trailers & Footage

On November 8, Netflix released the opening credit sequence for Wednesday. Netflix noted that the credits were “guided by Tim Burton and set to Danny Elfman’s haunting score.”

The official trailer debuted during the show’s New York Comic Con panel on October 8. Wednesday heads to Nevermore Academy, and she couldn’t be less thrilled. “I act as if I don’t care if people dislike me. Deep down… I actually enjoy it,” she says. The show’s Uncle Fester, played by Fred Armisen, is revealed in the trailer.

Fred Armisen
Fred Armisen will play Uncle Fester. (Netflix)

Wednesday has a gut feeling that there’s “something wrong” with Nevermore. She vows that she won’t “stop until I find the truth.” Christina Ricci, who previously played Wednesday, pops up in the final moments of the trailer. She plays Ms. Thornhill, who works at Nevermore Academy.

During Netflix’s TUDUM event on September 24, new footage of Wednesday was revealed in a nearly two-minute clip. Wednesday is in her room and finds Thing being a little mischievous. She catches Thing and demands to know why he’s here. Thing was sent by her parents to spy on her.

Wednesday gives Thing two options, one of which includes pledging his “undying loyalty” to her. Thing chooses loyalty. She wants to escape Nevermore Academy. “Our first order of business is to escape this teenage purgatory. Of course, I have a plan. And it begins now,” Wednesday tells her partner in crime.

Netflix revealed the main teaser on August 17. When Pugsley gets bullied at school, Wednesday plots her revenge. “The only person who gets to torture my brother is me,” Wednesday tells a group full of boys before dropping two bags of piranhas in the pool. Naturally, she gets expelled.

Wednesday is taken to Nevermore Academy, where her parents met. Her mother, Morticia Addams, tells Wednesday that she’ll “finally” be among peers who “understand” her. She meets plenty of people along the way and ultimately thinks she’ll like Nevermore.

The first official teaser trailer for Wednesday dropped on June 6 during Netflix’s Geeked Week. The trailer and a newly-released photo gave fans a first look at Jenna as the titular character. Jenna embodies Wednesday with her signature braided pigtails and black polka dot dress with a white collar. Thing also makes a quick appearance on Wednesday’s left shoulder.

The official Wednesday synopsis reads: “Wednesday is a sleuthing, supernaturally infused mystery charting 16-year-old Wednesday Addams’ years as a student at Nevermore Academy. Season one will follow Wednesday as she attempts to master her emerging psychic ability, thwart a monstrous killing spree that has terrorized the local town, and solve the murder mystery that embroiled her parents 25 years ago — all while navigating her new and very tangled relationships at Nevermore.”

Wednesday Release Date

Netflix has confirmed that Wednesday will premiere on November 23, 2022. The first season will consist of 8 episodes that will debut all on the same day. Wednesday will be available to stream only on Netflix.

Wednesday Cast & Crew

Wednesday will feature a very talented cast. Jenna Ortega, known for her roles in YouYes Day, Scream, and The Fallout, will star as Wednesday. Jenna shared the news of her casting on Instagram in May 2021.

Jenna Ortega
Jenna Ortega as Wednesday Addams. (Netflix)

“New chapter. Hope I can do Wednesday Addams justice. *snaps twice*,” she wrote, alongside a photo of her holding a script for the show. The photo has since been deleted.

In a featurette released by Netflix on August 24, Jenna revealed that the show begins with Wednesday getting expelled from school for attempted murder and sent to Nevermore, where she has to “navigate her way through this new school, new relationships. But then also, she’s dealing with this serious investigation involving serial killers and murders and monsters.”

Jenna also noted that it was important to her to do something “different” from past iterations of the character. “She’s a bit more socially awkward. There’s a confidence there, but it’s more concealed,” she said. “Wednesday is technically a Latina character and that’s never been represented, so for me, any time that I have the opportunity to represent my community I want that to be seen.”

Wednesday
Catherine Zeta-Jones, Jenna Ortega, Luis Guzmán, and Issac Ordonez. (Netflix)

Catherine Zeta-Jones will play Wednesday’s mother, Morticia Addams. Luis Guzman has been cast as Wednesday’s father, Gomez Addams, though only in a guest star role. Wednesday’s brother, Pugsley Addams, will be played by Isaac Ordonez.

Uncle Fester will be played by Saturday Night Live alum Fred Armisen. The actor shaved his head to play the iconic character. “They really did such a great job with the makeup and everything. I had no eyebrows. It was prosthetics over my eyebrows to give me that look,” Fred told Vanity Fair. “But I think that bald caps don’t look great all the time, so I was hoping to just make it that much more convincing.”

The main cast also includes Game of Thrones alum Gwendoline Christie as Larissa Weems, Ricki Lindhome as Dr. Valerie Kinbott, Jamie McShane as Sheriff Donovan Galpin, Hunter Doohan as Tyler Galpin, Georgie Farmer as Ajax Petropolus, Moosa Mostafa as Euge Otinger, Emma Myers as Enid Sinclair, Naomi J. Ogawa as Yoko Tanka, Joy Sunday as Bianca Barclay, Percy Hynes White as Xavier Thorpe, and Victor Dorobantu as Thing. Thora Birch (Hocus Pocus) was previously cast as Tamara Novak, Wednesday’s dorm mother, but she had to exit the series in December 2021. “Thora has returned to the States to attend to a personal matter and will not be returning to the production,” a rep for MGM Television, which is producing the show, told Deadline in a statement.

HollywoodLife spoke EXCLUSIVELY to Emma ahead of the show’s premiere about Enid and Wednesday’s friendship. “I think Enid and Wednesday both kind of take from each other. I think they both teach each other very important lessons like Enid teaches Wednesday that she can feel emotions and she can cry and still be a badass and still be strong. Wednesday teaches Enid how to stand up for herself and to just be okay with who she is. So I think they really bring out the best in each other, and I think it’s great that they became roommates,” Emma told HollywoodLife.

In March 2022, it was officially confirmed that Christina Ricci would return to The Addams Family franchise and appear in Wednesday. As reported by Deadline, Christina is playing a new character and not an older version of Wednesday. Christina teased more about her role in an August 2021 interview with Variety. “I was really flattered to be asked and to be asked by Tim,” the Yellowjackets star said. “It’s nice to be a part of this next iteration of that character. It’s fun to watch and it’s fun to see other people’s takes on things and what they put of themselves into something like that.”

HollywoodLife spoke EXCLUSIVELY with Christina about being a part of this new chapter and Jenna’s performance. “It’s really exciting, and it’s really fun. From the moment I saw this sort of new interpretation of her look, I was like, oh my God, that’s so smart and so cool,” Christina said. “And then to see her performance… it’s really great. It’s a really great, modern take on it. It feels more timely and appropriate. She has that sort of self-respect and dignity that really is at the core of Wednesday. All of her choices are so smart. I have so much respect for Jenna, and I think people are going to love her as Wednesday.”

Alfred Gough and Miles Millar (Smallville) are the creators of Wednesday. Tim Burton (Beetlejuice, Edward ScissorhandsBatman Returns) is directing the series in his TV directorial debut. Alfred, Miles and Tim are also executive producers, alongside Jon Glickman, Andrew Mittman, Gail Berman, Kayla Alpert and Steve Stark.

Development Details

Wednesday was initially announced in October 2020, as an unnamed The Addams Family project under Tim Burton. After the showrunners and executive producers came on board, Netflix officially gave the project a series order of eight episodes in February 2021. Filming began that September in Bucharest, Romania. The show wrapped in early 2022.

In the recent featurette, Tim pointed out that in the past incarnations of Wednesday Addams “it’s been very cartoony. So in this longer form, we just tried to give it a reality which I loved.”

Jenna Ortega
Jenna Ortega in ‘Wednesday.’ (Netflix)

The series has been described as a “coming-of-age comedy” with “a sleuthing, supernaturally infused mystery” focusing on Wednesday during her high school years at Nevermore Academy, according to Deadline. The show’s official longline, previously released by Netflix, reads, “Wednesday’s attempts to master her emerging psychic ability, thwart a monstrous killing spree that has terrorized the local town, and solve the supernatural mystery that embroiled her parents 25 years ago — all while navigating her new and very tangled relationships at Nevermore.”

Miles Millar, co-showrunner and executive producer, noted: “It’s very important to us that it wasn’t a remake or a reboot, that this is a new chapter of Wednesday Addams’ life.” Alfred Gough, also a co-showrunner and executive producer, added that this show is really about “exploring” Wednesday’s “journey into adulthood.”



Source link

#Wednesday #Netflix #Update #Season #News

Alison Star Locke on the Coexistence of Accountability and Compassion in “The Apology”

Alison Star Locke began her writing career as a story producer for reality TV and has written, directed, and produced numerous shorts. Her favorite, “Shhhhhhh…,” was laureled-up by the Los Angeles Film Festival and the Denver Film Festival. Her script “The Projectionist” won second place at Slamdance in the Horror/Thriller category. Her scripts have placed in numerous contests, including the BloodList, Nicholls, Screamfest, Women In Horror Film Festival, Scriptapalooza, and Fright Night. 

“The Apology” will be in theaters and available on AMC+ and Shudder December 16.

W&H: Describe the film for us in your own words.

ASL: “The Apology” is a dark Christmas tale, a genre blender of psychological thriller, horror, and chamber piece drama. It’s largely a two-hander between Darlene (Anna Gunn) and Jack (Linus Roache) as a huge thundersnowstorm rages outside and traps them together to work out their past in a rather big way. 

But Darlene’s best friend, Gretchen (Janeane Garofalo), also plays a rather pivotal, moving part in the proceedings. Anna and Linus are notorious powerhouse masters, and I’m so grateful for and proud of their work here. Janeane is stunning in how still and quiet she is in this film in a way I think will be surprising to most people, although not to us superfans. But don’t worry, she’s still funny in this, too.

W&H: What drew you to this story?

ASL: As cheesy and cliché as it sounds, it came to me in a dream. In it, there was a knock on my front door in the middle of the night at Christmastime, and a man said, “I know what happened to your daughter.” I’ve always been fascinated with true crime stories, so that’s where the specifics came from. 

But as I started writing, the story evolved into this personal metaphor for the experience of sticking up for my daughter and her rights as a neurodiverse child in a less than accommodating world, and how I had become obsessed with being there for her and had almost lost my way in that pursuit of giving her every chance I could. Obviously, having a disabled child is light-years away from searching for a missing child, but that’s art for you.

I finally found confidence in my voice again through the making of this film. It’s been pretty damn powerful for me.

W&H: What do you want people to think about after they watch the film?

ASL: I hope they think about how complicated we all are, how crucial compassion is, and whether real change is possible. If it is possible, what does that need to look like to be real, to last? I want audiences to believe in their own power and remember the love that already surrounds them. 

And I would love for people to have real conversations about violence against women, physical and emotional, how women should be more empowered to expect safety and real love from men, and that men should be set up to live emotionally healthy, fulfilled lives as well. Accountability and compassion shouldn’t be mutually exclusive. And it’d also be cool if we really talked about how much work Christmas tends to be for moms. Big goals but, hey, I’m an ambitious lady. 

W&H: What was the biggest challenge in making the film?

ASL: It was my first feature film so it was all a challenge and a learning curve. But it was also a dream come true.

I had been a stay-at-home mom and advocate for my autistic daughter for years before coming back to work to make this film. So I think the biggest challenge was managing my huge feelings of gratitude for the opportunity, shock at how much people wanted to hear from me, and then trying to support my cast and crew to do their best work with an intense story and such a short schedule, just 16 principal photography days, all at once.

I’m a crier on set anyway. It’s how I usually know I have the scene, but this time, I cried a lot more. I think avoiding tears at all costs at work, especially creative work, is a very patriarchal, unhealthy thing.

W&H: How did you get your film funded? Share some insights into how you got the film made.

ASL: It’s a bit of a true fairy tale, to be honest. There was so much hard work involved, of course, but it started from a very pure place. Stacy Jorgensen, one of the producers on the film, used to act in my short films, and we also produced and collaborated on a whole bunch of projects together. Then I had my daughter and she moved from acting and to producing full-time. I sent Stacy the script for “The Apology” and asked if she could just recommend someone to send it to. And much to my shock, she called me up and said, “I want to produce this. We’ll find a home for it but let’s at least start with the company I work for, Company X. They’re very picky so they probably won’t say yes. But let’s start there.” 

And then they said yes. I got the news as I was picking my mother up from the airport for the holidays, and it felt like some magical Christmas present. This is not what happens to middle-aged mom indie filmmakers trying to make their first feature. I still can’t believe it. And then Stacy and Company X took the film to Mark Ward at RLJE Films. It turned out that I’d been volunteering for years at my kiddo’s school book fair with Mark’s fantastic wife, so Mark and I just hit it off right away, both being horror hounds and parents who live in the same neighborhood. He’s been so supportive and green-lit the film. Stacy and Lisa Whalen, Company X’s CEO, worked their tails off to put it all together.

W&H: What inspired you to become a filmmaker?

ASL: Like many ‘80s kids, I saw “The Goonies” and “Poltergeist” really young and they got me excited about the movies. My mom was always supportive about my interest in film and would take me to the movies, dollar cinema and art house alike, my whole childhood. When I saw families I related to in “Gas Food Lodging” and “Running on Empty,” it began to feel like something I could do, telling my own stories about my own family or my own fascinations. 

But the film that made me want to direct was “Taxi Driver,” specifically the moment when Travis is on the payphone trying to convince Betsy to give him another chance and the camera just pans away from him and stays on that empty hall. That blew me away, the idea that where you put, and move, the camera can indicate feeling like that, that humiliation and hopelessness could feel so visceral. 

W&H: What’s the best and worst advice you’ve received?

ASL: Like almost all creatives, I’ve suffered from imposter syndrome. Especially after being home with my daughter for years and trying to write and get scripts out to producers, I started to feel filmmaking wasn’t realistic for me. But then – and I wish I could credit who said this to me – I would lay out all this defeatist worry and they would just say, “Well, why not you?” And that became my mantra. “Why not me?” Men don’t ask for as much permission or seek as much validation as we do to start something so we have to back each other up. Having my amazing all-female producing team backing me up – Stacy, Lisa, and Kim Sherman – did wonders for that. 

The worst advice I’ve gotten has often been the most well-intentioned, basically telling you to follow the specific path or approach to the work that they did. So if something doesn’t seem to fit the best way for you to work, listen to those instincts. You know more than you think you do. And it really is true: there’s no correct, one way to do things.

W&H: What advice do you have for other women directors?

ASL: Use your life experience in your work, and not just in the story you’re telling. I use the persistence, patience, and organizational skills I learned in advocating for my daughter when working with my collaborators. You have more secret skills than you think you do and we don’t have to lead in the traditional, male ways to be successful.

We can fight the toxicity, starting in our own meetings and on our sets. Set boundaries early, often and with great clarity, but don’t be afraid to lead with love, appreciation, and a collaborative, open spirit. And carve out time and space in your personal life to give enough love to your work, too. As women, we’re conditioned to make everything else a priority but our work needs deserve our attention, too. 

W&H: Name your favorite woman-directed film and why.

ASL: There’s so many woman directors who inspire me, but I’d have to say it’s a dead heat between “The Babadook” by Jennifer Kent and “Fast Times At Ridgemont High” by Amy Heckerling. 

“The Babadook” is one of my more recent passions. When I first saw this film, it evoked so many feelings about the early, hard days before my daughter was actually diagnosed and we all got the help we needed to be there for her. Luckily, nothing as dark as the film, but it tapped into one of my main themes: how hard it is to be a mother. I’m so grateful for my girl but there is so little support for mothers, still, let alone mothers of children with differing needs. Kent’s film made me see there was a space for me to tell stories about that. And it’s just a gorgeous, big swing of a film. 

“Fast Times” was one of the pivotal movies of my childhood that put young women’s feelings and experiences at the center and brought a female POV to the male characters as well. It’s a movie I’ve grown up with and so, my relationship with it keeps changing and deepening. Great flicks will do that. They’ll mean different things to you at different points of your life. 

I’m also just so, so happy to see Chantal Akerman’s “Jeanne Dielman” at the top of the Sight and Sound list. That’s one of my favorite films as well and a huge, emboldening influence on me.

W&H: What, if any, responsibilities do you think storytellers have to confront the tumult in the world, from the pandemic to the loss of abortion rights and systemic violence?

ASL: We all have a responsibility to reflect our world and that absolutely includes brutal realities like our abortion rights being stripped away and people confusing selfishness for freedom, i.e. not wearing masks. Everything I write is confronting bigger issues like these in various ways. There are many ways to tell stories that bring us into the reality of these issues without them necessarily being “issue” films, which can sometimes be more effective. 

I would love to see more representation of the real-life horrors of the world in films because I am a feminist and a progressive and a humanist and also a huge horror fan. I think “sneaking” these issues into genres like horror is a great way to confront them. With “The Apology,” I wanted to explore the way women are too often seen as expendable, that the male perpetrator is always given sympathy, and women are left feeling unseen and unsafe. 

I also wanted to create something set in a female battleground. Revenge is usually looked at as something that is all about brute force being met with brute force, but I didn’t connect with that. So how would this woman want to get revenge? Is justice even possible in a system this broken? I’m especially interested in the emotional and physical violence involved in gender inequality and all the many ways it manifests in our lives.

W&H: The film industry has a long history of underrepresenting people of color onscreen and behind the scenes and reinforcing – and creating – negative stereotypes. What actions do you think need to be taken to make it more inclusive?

ASL: We need more underrepresented people in crucial, decision-making positions to open it all up more. You hear all the time about how, say, white men won’t hire a Black woman because they “don’t feel comfortable” or “don’t relate” or other code-phrases for racism – that’s so damaging and inexcusable. We are each, to a one, accountable to do better. 

But I think one of the more actionable items is the retention and growth for underrepresented people. Too often, folks don’t get access to these opportunities because they are viewed as not experienced enough or not known enough, but they can’t get to that point without people giving them a chance. We need to give more chances to people to not only make that first thing but also to have more chances to grow. 

Breakthrough contests and programs are wonderful but we need more ongoing support. That also includes looking at your own cast and crew list and saying, “Where is the mentorship and are we offering a chance for positions or roles?”

We all need to be rigorous in thinking of filmmaking as community building. We shouldn’t just be looking for the absolute most experienced person for every single job or only direct recommendations. That approach too often excludes people of color. Fresh voices give us, as filmmakers, unique insights and give audiences a more varied, and therefore more rich, view of the world, and hopefully make them feel that their world is being reflected.





Source link

#Alison #Star #Locke #Coexistence #Accountability #Compassion #Apology

Avatar: The Way of Water (English) Movie Review: AVATAR: THE WAY OF WATER rests on spellbinding visuals, action, never-before-seen scale, clap worthy climax and a strong emotional undercurrent.

Avatar: The Way of Water (English) Review {4.5/5} & Review Rating

AVATAR: THE WAY OF WATER is the story of a man going to insane lengths to keep his family safe. More than a decade has passed since the events of the first film. Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña) are happily residing together with fellow Na’vi’s. They are parents to elder son Neteyam (Jamie Flatters), younger son Lo’ak (Britain Dalton) and daughter Tuktirey aka Tuk (Trinity Jo-Li Bliss). They have adopted Kiri (Sigourney Weaver), who was created from the avatar of the deceased Dr Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver). These four kids are good friends with Miles Socorro aka Spider (Jake Champion), the child of none other than Colonel Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang), the antagonist of the first part who dies in the end. Though Spider is a human, he spends his time with the Na’vis and pretends to be like them. All is going well until one day, the humans aka ‘Sky People’ once again descend on Pandora. In a year’s time, they build a huge settlement, bigger than what was constructed by them last time. And this time, Miles comes back from the dead. He gets resurrected by the RDA (Resources Development Administration) as a Recombinant, that is, an avatar embedded with the memories of human. The aim of Miles’ avatar is to take revenge from Jake Sully and Neytiri. The Na’vi community have been causing damage to RDA’s structures and railway lines. The RDA forces too hit back. Jake feels that it’s him that they want to defeat and for this reason, the rest of the Na’vi population shouldn’t suffer. Hence, he and his family leave the Na’vi settlement in the forest. They travel hundreds of miles and reach the village of the Metkayina tribe, headed by Tonowari (Cliff Curtis) and Ronal (Kate Winslet). This tribe are ‘reef people’ who worship the sea. Their bodies are more suited for activities underwater. Hence, when Jake and his family ask them for refuge, they at first deny it since they feel their bodies are not meant for their lifestyle. But soon, they are allowed to assimilate and they slowly learn the way of life of Metkayina. Miles, meanwhile, kidnaps Spider and is trying his best to find out where Jake, Neytiri and their kids have fled. What happens next forms the rest of the film.

James Cameron, Rick Jaffa, Amanda Silver, Josh Friedman and Shane Salerno’s story is simple and a bit clichéd. But James Cameron, Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver’s screenplay is splendid. The way they have treated this story and added a lot of depth, as well as entertainment, is praiseworthy. The dialogues are simple yet sharp.

James Cameron’s direction is splendid. The genius filmmaker once again gets it right. He takes his own sweet time to establish the world and the conflict, and in the third act, he goes all out in giving viewers a paisa-vasool experience. As expected, he handled the scale flawlessly. We had seen the fascinating world of Pandora in the first part. Here, shows a different part of the moon and the underwater element enhances the visual impact. But more than that, he scores on the emotional front. A very interesting angle of the outcast is tackled and it’ll touch the hearts of the viewers. Thankfully, it’s shown in such a simple manner that not just classes, but even the masses will be able to relate to and comprehend it.

On the flipside, nothing much happens in the first half. Like the first part, James Cameron does the build-up and helps viewers understand the world before commencing the action bit in the second half. While the intent is understandable, one still does get a bit impatient especially due to the long length. This 192-minute-long film should have been shorter by 10 minutes, especially in the first half. A few developments are not convincing, like Aonung (Filip Geljo) turning into a bully all of a sudden. Also, the way the Sully family escape without feeling sorry for Spider or even regret not saving him is not easy to digest. The backstory of the tulkun, Payakan, is not presented neatly. The makers should have taken care of this aspect as it forms an important part of the film.

AVATAR: THE WAY OF WATER starts on a fine note. The scene where the Na’vi community blasts the railway scene is entertaining. Miles finding the dead body of his human avatar and realizing how he died is well thought of. The scene thereafter is nail-biting. The entry of Tsireya (Bailey Bass) is eye-catching and the scene where she tells Lo’ak that his heart is beating fast is too funny. The entry sequence of Payakan is heroic. Post-interval, the film takes time in a little more build up. But the pre-climax fight is where there will be a frenzy in cinemas. Just when you think that the fight is done, you’ll be in for a surprise as there’s one more action sequence in the climax and it’s also worth watching. The film ends with the hint of the third part in the offing.

Movie Review: Avatar: The Way of Water (English)

Speaking of performances, Sam Worthington yet again puts up a very impressive act. The last time, he played the role of an amateur who’s struggling to learn the ways of the Navi’s. This time, he’s supposed to be the mature one and also the protector of his family. He brings this aspect alive nicely. Zoe Saldaña is terrific yet again. Her act in the last 30 minutes is splendid. Stephen Lang is too good as the antagonist yet again. Sigourney Weaver and Jake Champion have a significant part and leave a huge mark. Jamie Flatters and Britain Dalton are fair but it’ll be difficult for the audience to distinguish between the two. Trinity Jo-Li Bliss and Cliff Curtis get limited scope. Kate Winslet does fine but looks quite unrecognizable. In fact, audiences might not even realize that they are seeing the TITANIC [1997] star on screen. Bailey Bass is cute and does a good job. Filip Geljo is passable.

Simon Franglen’s music exhilarates the impact manifold. Russell Carpenter’s cinematography is breathtaking and yet very neat. The underwater scenes are captured with utmost perfection. Dylan Cole and Ben Procter’s production design is very rich and appealing. Bob Buck and Deborah L Scott’s costumes are one of a kind as per the requirement. The action is a bit gory in one or two scenes but otherwise, it’s very entertaining. The VFX, as expected, is truly out-of-the-world and many notches higher than what we had seen in AVATAR [2009]. David Brenner, James Cameron, John Refoua and Stephen E Rivkin’s editing could have been crisper.

On the whole, AVATAR: THE WAY OF WATER rests on spellbinding visuals, entertaining action scenes, never-before-seen scale, clapworthy climax and a strong emotional undercurrent in the storyline due to which it can run riot from East to West, and North to South at the box office. It is also at a huge advantage thanks to the popularity of the first part, extreme curiosity about the film, zero competition and inflated ticket rates. If the word of mouth is strong, it won’t be surprising if it emerges as the biggest Hollywood grosser in India, surpassing the numbers of AVENGERS: ENDGAME [2019].

Source link

#Avatar #Water #English #Movie #Review #AVATAR #WATER #rests #spellbinding #visuals #action #neverbeforeseen #scale #clap #worthy #climax #strong #emotional #undercurrent

Queer Common Spaces: Podcast Picks

Find friends who don’t judge you. Find friends who understand you. Find friends who listen to you, help you grow, and commiserate with you when the future seems uncertain. All these qualities can be found in this week’s podcasts, which center on queer creators who are cultivating safe communities for queer folks. 

In discussions about relationships, family, politics, literary canons, therapy, and everything in between, these podcasts have something for you to laugh about and learn from. With each podcast maintaining a light and conversational tone, the creators show us that gender and sexuality discourse can be accessible and entertaining. 

Here are Women and Hollywood’s latest podcast selections.

“En(ba)by” — Created by Gara, Maggie, and Basil

“En(ba)by”

First airing in 2020, “En(ba)by” is a weekly podcast that covers all things gender. Hosted by Gara Lonning, a trans and non-binary comedian, writer, and performer, “En(ba)by” consciously weaves humor with topics both serious and commonplace. Lonning co-hosts with Maggie Dunleavy and Basil Lee.

No two shows are the same. In episodes that range from 40-60 minutes, Lonning, Dunleavy, and Lee interview guests about topics including gender-affirming surgery, dating, and friendship. The hosts also engage with audiences through a Q&A advice section in select episodes. Listeners can submit questions for upcoming shows through a link in the description of the latest episode.

In “Dear En(ba)by: The Kinsey Five,” which aired in June, the hosts get personal. A listener describes a teammate who made transphobic comments towards them when they opened up about their chosen name and their experiences of gender euphoria. The listener questioned whether or not these issues were even significant enough to bring up, since her other teammates didn’t seem to notice nor take issue with the perpetrator.

The “En(ba)by” hosts listen with empathy and share personal stories that acknowledge and validate the listener’s experience. Lonning has a particularly memorable response, emphasizing, “There’s not a scale of how transphobic something is, it either is transphobic or it’s not transphobic.” The hosts discuss the difficulty of advocating for yourself and your identity. 

Even though they deal with some serious topics, every conversation is filled with the warmth and comfort of being in a room with close friends. “En(ba)by” handles sensitive issues with care, but also with levity, making this podcast an easy and fun listen.

Listen to “En(ba)by” on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. 

“Two Twos” — Created by Nana and Rose

“Two Twos”

“Two Twos” is created by London-based Black lesbian sister duo, Nana and Rose. In hour-long episodes, the siblings speak their “unapologetic truth whilst creating a safe space for people like themselves and bridging the gap between LGBT+ people and cisgender straight people.” From topics like mental health, single parenting, sex and romance, as well as cultivating community for queer people, Nana and Rose leave no rock unturned.

In Episode 128, “‘I wanted to cultivate a home for queer people” ft @drybabe (K),’” the “Two Twos” hosts invite their friend K to discuss the importance of diverse literature. Librarian by day and DJ by night, K recognized a gap in access to inclusive literature in schools. To mitigate this issue, she created PRIM, a database that acts as “a space for Black existence, showcasing the varying mediums used for storytelling in one place.” Not only has K developed this resource featuring visual, aural, and written storytelling, she’s facilitating pop-up events, such as the “It Started With Me” gallery curated by PRIM, which premiered at the NOW Gallery this past October. 

In a poignant discussion about libraries, Nana asserts, “It’s about access.” She shares that, as a child, having access to books written by Black authors and featuring characters she could relate to changed her whole life — these books inspired her to become a writer. 

K builds on this personal experience. She emphasizes that many schools lack any library facilities at all. But the issue goes further than access to books. K forces us to consider what books are, who they’re written by, and “how much can a young Black girl or Black boy or nonbinary young person see themselves in these books.” She explains that when you acknowledge the diversity in life experiences (or lack thereof) represented in a library, you recognize that it “is not just about providing books. It’s about curating, it’s about making sure you have a wide variety to appeal to what is a very multicultural environment.” It’s necessary to engage with and demand such inclusion.

Listen to “Two Twos” on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. 

“QueerWOC” — Created by Dr. Money

“QueerWOC”

“QueerWOC,” hosted by a relational therapist known as Dr. Money, debuted in 2016. In these biweekly hour-long shows, Dr. Money “unites, ignites, and excites” the queer women of color community through “reimagining healing, identity, and community.” Covering a wealth of topics from capitalism, protests, and feminism to relationship and queer-specific issues, Dr. Money approaches each episode with a joyful warmth and an eagerness to learn alongside her audience.

In Episode 116, which aired November 20 this year, “Every Sapphic I Know,” dives into affordable therapy tips and intense sapphic friendships. However, before she digs into this discussion, Dr. Money begins the show with a regular segment she calls “QueerWOC of the Week.” Dr. Money celebrates Councilwomen Erika Hilton and Duda Salabert, who were recently elected to the National Congress in Brazil this October. Hilton and Salabert were the first openly trans women in Brazil to be elected as federal deputies, is no small feat in a country where 2SLGBTQIA+ people are killed at a higher rate than anywhere else in the world. In 2021, there were 125 reported murders among the trans and gender-diverse population in Brazil.

Dr. Money discusses Hilton’s progressive platform, fighting for education, LGBTQ+ rights, and housing access, noting that the trans community is disproportionately impacted by survival sex, substance abuse, and houselessness due to transphobia.

Salabert ran under the Democratic Labor Party, and made history by amassing the highest number of votes any councilperson in the state of Mines Gerais had ever received. In this landmark election, Hilton and Salabert make huge strides for the representation of women and queer people in government.

With Dr. Money’s “QueerWOC,” you’ll either find yourself nodding along to the sapphic truths she speaks, or learning about something new alongside the host in a compelling and comprehensible way.

Listen to “QueerWOC” on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. 

Source link

#Queer #Common #Spaces #Podcast #Picks

Golden Globes 2023: RRR To Brendan Fraser – Full List Of Nominees

A still from the video. (courtesy: A24 )

The Golden Globes nominations were announced on Monday with much excitement for India; RRR scored two nominations – Best Non-English Language Film and Best Original Song for Naatu Naatu. The honour roll was peppered with other bits of excitement such as Brendan Fraser who earned a Best Actor (Drama) nod for his comeback performance in The Whale. Several usual suspects showed up in various categories – Brad Pitt and Margot Robbie are up for their performances in Babylon, Daniel Craig for Glass Onion and Austin Butler for Elvis.

The Best Actress (Drama) category is crowded with formidable names – Ana De Armas for Blonde, Cate Blanchett for Tar, Olivia Colman for Empire Of Light, Viola Davis for The Woman King and Michelle Williams for The Fabelmans.

The television awards also had a list of golden Globe veterans, among them Zendaya, Laura Linney, Bob Odenkirk, Donald Glover and Bill Hader. All three Only Murders In The Building stars – Selena Gomez, Martin Short and Steve Martin – are nominated as is the show.

The Golden Globes award ceremony will be held in Los Angeles on January 10 (early morning of January 11 for India) and will be hosted by comedian Jerrod Carmichael.

Here is the complete list of nominees:

Best Motion Picture – Drama
Avatar: The Way of Water
Elvis
The Fabelmans
Tár
Top Gun: Maverick

Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Drama
Cate Blanchett, Tar
Olivia Colman, Empire of Light
Viola Davis, The Woman King
Ana de Armas, Blonde
Michelle Williams, The Fabelmans

Best Actor in a Motion Picture – Drama
Austin Butler, Elvis
Brendan Fraser, The Whale
Hugh Jackman, The Son
Bill Nighy, Living
Jeremy Pope, The Inspection

Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy
Babylon
The Banshees of Inisherin
Everything Everywhere All at Once
Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery
Triangle of Sadness

Best  Actress in a Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy
Lesley Manville, Mrs. Harris Goes to Paris
Margot Robbie, Babylon
Anya Taylor-Joy, The Menu
Emma Thompson, Good Luck to You, Leo Grande
Michelle Yeoh, Everything Everywhere All at Once

Best Actor in a Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy
Diego Calva, Babylon
Daniel Craig, Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery
Adam Driver, White Noise
Colin Farrell, The Banshees of Inisherin
Ralph Fiennes, The Menu

Best Actor in a Limited Series, Anthology Series, or a Motion Picture Made for Television
Taron Egerton, Black Bird
Colin Firth, The Staircase
Andrew Garfield, Under the Banner of Heaven
Evan Peters, Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story
Sebastian Stan, Pam and Tommy

Best Actor in a Supporting Role in a Limited Series, Anthology Series or Motion Picture Made for Television
F. Murray Abraham, The White Lotus
Domhnall Gleeson, The Patient
Paul Walter Hauser, Black Bird
Richard Jenkins, Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story
Seth Rogen, Pam and Tommy

Best Actor in a Television Series – Musical or Comedy
Donald Glover, Atlanta
Bill Hader, Barry
Steve Martin, Only Murders in the Building
Martin Short, Only Murders in the Building
Jeremy Allen White, The Bear

Best Television Series – Musical or Comedy
Abbott Elementary
The Bear
Hacks
Only Murders in the Building
Wednesday

Best Motion Picture – Non-English Language
RRR (India)
All Quiet on the Western Front (Germany)
Argentina, 1985 (Argentina)
Close (Belgium)
Decision To Leave (South Korea)

Best Actress in a Limited Series, Anthology Series, or a Motion Picture Made for Television
Jessica Chastain, George and Tammy
Julia Garner, Inventing Anna
Lily James, Pam and Tommy
Julia Roberts, Gaslit
Amanda Seyfried, The Dropout

Best Actress in a Supporting Role in a Limited Series, Anthology Series or Motion Picture Made for Television
Jennifer Coolidge – The White Lotus
Claire Danes – Fleishman Is in Trouble
Daisy Edgar-Jones – Under the Banner of Heaven
Niecy Nash-Betts – Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story
Aubrey Plaza – The White Lotus

Best Actress in a Supporting Role in a Musical-Comedy or Drama Television Series

Elizabeth Debicki – The Crown
Hannah Einbinder – Hacks
Julia Garner – Ozark
Janelle James – Abbott Elementary
Sheryl Lee Ralph – Abbott Elementary

Best Television Limited Series, Anthology Series or Motion Picture Made for Television
Black Bird
Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story
Pam and Tommy
The Dropout
The White Lotus: Sicily

Best Motion Picture – Animated  
Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio
Inu-Oh
Marcel the Shell With Shoes On
Puss in Boots: The Last Wish
Turning Red

Best Original Score – Motion Picture

Alexandre Desplat – Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio
Hildur Guðnadóttir – Women Talking
Justin Hurwitz – Babylon
John Williams – The Fabelmans
Carter Burwell – The Banshees of Inisherin

Best Screenplay – Motion Picture
Todd Field – Tár
Tony Kushner & Steven Spielberg – The Fabelmans
Daniel Kwan, Daniel Scheinert – Everything Everywhere All at Once
Martin McDonagh – The Banshees of Inisherin
Sarah Polley – Women Talking

Best Director – Motion Picture
James Cameron – Avatar: The Way of Water
Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert – Everything Everywhere All At Once
Baz Luhrmann – Elvis
Martin McDonagh – The Banshees of Inisherin
Steven Spielberg – The Fabelmans

Best Television Series – Drama
Better Call Saul
The Crown
House of the Dragon
Ozark
Severance

Best Actress in a Supporting Role in Any Motion Picture
Angela Bassett – Black Panther: Wakanda Forever
Kerry Condon – The Banshees of Inisherin
Jamie Lee Curtis – Everything Everywhere All at Once
Dolly De Leon – Triangle of Sadness
Carey Mulligan – She Said

Best Original Song – Motion Picture
Naatu Naatu – Kala Bhairava, M. M. Keeravani, Rahul Sipligunj (RRR)
Carolina – Taylor Swift (Where the Crawdads Sing)
Ciao Papa – Guillermo del Toro & Roeban Katz (Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio)
Hold My Hand – Lady Gaga and Bloodpop (Top Gun: Maverick)
Lift Me Up – Tems, Ludwig Göransson, Rihanna and Ryan Coogler (Black Panther: Wakanda Forever)

Best Actor in a Television Series – Drama
Jeff Bridges – The Old Man
Kevin Costner – Yellowstone
Diego Luna – Andor
Bob Odenkirk – Better Call Saul
Adam Scott – Severance

Best Actor in a Supporting Role in Any Motion Picture
Brendan Gleeson – The Banshees of Inisherin
Ke Huy Quan – Everything Everywhere All at Once
Barry Keoghan –The Banshees of Inisherin
Brad Pitt – Babylon
Eddie Redmayne – The Good Nurse

Featured Video Of The Day

On Rajinikanth’s Birthday, A Gift for Fans – Baba Released Again

Source link

#Golden #Globes #RRR #Brendan #Fraser #Full #List #Nominees

Malayalam director Tharun Moorthy: ‘Saudi Vellakka’ has been an emotional journey

‘I don’t know what is in store for the future. But I feel that I have done something in my life after making this movie.’ This is director Tharun Moorthy’s latest Facebook post about his new movie, Saudi Vellakka CC 225/2009. The filmmaker, who had a brilliant debut with Operation Java(2021), has struck gold at the box office with this heartwarming social drama.

“A film that connects with the audience seldom fails. We believe that has happened with Saudi Vellakka. If you love cinema, it will love you back. I enjoy the process of making a film. For me, Saudi Vellakka has been an emotional journey,” says the 33-year-old director.

Malayalam director Tharun Moorthy
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement

The film, inspired by a real incident, is a poignant take on how cases get dragged for years in Indian courts and how this affects the lives of the people involved. The case in this film is 14-years-old and the cause is just a vellakka (baby coconut). Aisha Ravuthar, an octogenarian, beats her nine-year-old neighbour, Abhilash, in a fit of rage, which she regrets later. Instigated by a few people, Abhilash’s family files a case.

Tharun says that it was director Ratheesh K Rajan who showed him a newspaper report about a case in Thiruvananthapuram involving an old woman and a 22-year-old youth that had been going on for years. “I collected the details and met the policemen and lawyers involved in the investigation and trial. It eventually led to Saudi Vellakka, of course, with changes in the original case and situations,” says Tharun.

Director Tharun Moorthy with actor Devi Varma on the sets of Saudi Vellakka

Director Tharun Moorthy with actor Devi Varma on the sets of Saudi Vellakka
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement

He wanted a new face to play the aged woman and the hunt began much before he wrote the script, for, it was important to “get the right face for the role.” The search ended in yesteryear theatre actor Gracy John or Saudi Gracy, who hailed from Saudi near Kochi. “I didn’t know that a place called Saudi existed until then. I located the film in Saudi for her. It was her first film and she was very excited about it. We even did the look test; unfortunately, she passed away due to COVID-related complications. I was shattered because I couldn’t fulfil her dream. However, her family wanted us to make the film for her,” Tharun says.

Cinema beckons
Having grown up in a family where discussions centred around theatre, Tharun says that he got hooked to art at a young age. “I did plays in school, some of which were directed by my father. I wanted to be an actor and join the film institute in Pune. But my father said that life is the best teacher and my experiences should equip me to become an actor.” He continued his studies, finished engineering and taught at an engineering college. “But I couldn’t give up on my dream. So, I quit my job and decided to try my luck in movies. My wife [Revathy Roy] supported my decision. Within three years Operation Java happened!”

He had to find a new artiste, for which he met several theatre actors in and around Kochi. “Many of them were not in a position to do the role because of their health issues. At one point, I thought of casting someone familiar, like Urvashi chechi. However, my producer [Sandip Senan] said that even though her presence might bring in more business for the movie, we should keep looking for a new face since that’s what I had visualised. I don’t know how many producers would say that!”

He finally found his Aisha in Tripunithura-native Devi Varma, the surprise element of the movie, whose face Tharun accidentally saw in a friend’s WhatsApp status. “She was his grandmother. She is not an actor, does not speak the Kochi dialect and had serious health issues. She was reluctant to act. But I didn’t budge and she agreed. She even had COVID in between, but thankfully came back hale and hearty,” Tharun says.

Veteran actor Pauly Valsan dubbed for Devi, which some people have criticised. “I had decided on Pauly chechi from the beginning. Many pointed out that Pauly chechi’’s voice is familiar to the audience, that it doesn’t suit the actor. But I believe that only those who closely follow Malayalam cinema might feel so. It shouldn’t be a problem for the rest of the audience. Similarly, [actor] Srinda dubbed for Dhanya Ananya [who played Nasi, Aisha’s daughter-in-law], because she too was finding the Kochi dialect difficult,” he adds. There were dialect coaches for actors such as Binu Pappu and Lukman Avaran who do not belong to Kochi. “The dialect has a rhythm and we wanted to bring that aspect in their dialogue delivery,” Tharun says.

Lukman Avaran and Binu Pappu in a scene from 'Saudi Vellakka'

Lukman Avaran and Binu Pappu in a scene from ‘Saudi Vellakka’
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement

The film has over 50 new artistes, many of them from the theatre. Tharun says that when he writes a character he assigns a face to it and his casting director Abu Valayamkulam was left with the “tough job” of finding the actors, irrespective of whether they could act or not. In Saudi Vellakka, Abu had the help of Tharun’s father, Madhu Moorthy, a theatre person, who also appears in a small role.

Tharun says that he and script assistant Dhanush Varghese did a lot of research on the script, especially for the court scenes. “We had to keep it real and different from what people have seen in films such as Nna Thaan Case Koduand Vaashi. We met lawyers and court clerks for inputs, anecdotes, gossip… and prepared notes. I also watched courtroom dramas in other languages to understand how to make my film different and what layers can be added to it. My cousin, Suresh Ramachandran, a lawyer, who is highly critical of how court scenes are shown in our movies, guided me.”

Tharun adds that all his technicians and his team of directors could relate to his vision for the movie.

The director also makes note of Binu Pappu, who essayed a powerful character and was also the chief associate director. “He comes with so much of experience before and behind the camera. He stepped in when four of my assistants came down with COVID at the same time. I am a director who likes my artistes to improvise on sets whereas he gets things done quickly. That helped in finishing the project on time,” Tharun adds.

Devi Varma in still from 'Saudi Vellakka'

Devi Varma in still from ‘Saudi Vellakka’
| Photo Credit:
Hari Thirumala

The film was planned to reach theatres in May this year but the release was postponed. “It was a conscious decision because that was a phase when people were not coming into theatres.We didn’t want Saudi Vellakka to be rejected and so decided to take it to as many people as possible,” explains Tharun. The team went all out by creating a buzz on social media through posters, videos, backstories of the actors, etc.

Eventually the film got selected for the Indian Panorama section at this year’s International Film Festival of India in Goa and Dhaka International Film Festival.

So, as the director of back-to-back hits, what is the secret? “I follow my own protocols and believe that script is foundation. You have to keep polishing it and it can be a continuous process,” he signs off.

Source link

#Malayalam #director #Tharun #Moorthy #Saudi #Vellakka #emotional #journey