Europe confronts an increasingly transnational far-right threat

Movements that could once be tackled one government at a time are more and more able to connect with each other across borders – and Elon Musk’s Twitter has given them a gift.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since the outbreak of the current war in Israel and Palestine, numerous European governments have warned of an uptick in two violent threats: Islamist extremism and antisemitism. Authorities in Germany, for instance, say that the threat of a jihadist attack is “higher than it has been for a long time”.

But in terms of what’s playing out on European streets and online, the threat of an organised, sometimes violent and increasingly transnational far right is becoming impossible to ignore.

Britain last month saw far-right counterprotesters attempt to disrupt a peaceful pro-Palestinian march in central London. Recent protests in Spain against an amnesty extended to Catalonian independence leaders attracted far-right elements.

And in France, the recent stabbing of a young boy in a southeastern village sparked days of protest, many of which featured out-and-out far right groups, including some from the notoriously extreme “Identitarian” movement.

The presence of extremists at the marches has been alarming enough that French Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin is seeking to ban three specific far-right groups, some of whose members are on a government extremism watchlist.

Announcing the crackdown, he cited the example of Ireland, where a mob recently ran riot in the centre of Dublin after several children were stabbed outside a school in broad daylight. Warning that “there is a mobilisation on the ultra-right that wants to tip us into civil war,” he praised the authorities for helping avoid “an Irish-style scenario”.

That scenario extends beyond the violence in Dublin itself and includes a wider, long-brewing movement with international reach.

While some commentators attributed the violence in Ireland to anger among working-class people suffering in a housing crisis while immigrants and asylum seekers are provided with accommodation and welfare benefits, others dismissed that argument as an excuse for something far more sinister.

Close observers of the Irish far right insist that the roots of the violence run deep, warning that openly racist and fascist groups are galvanising their supporters using increasingly violent rhetoric directed squarely at asylum seekers and immigrants of all kinds, especially those who are not white.

The incident followed a pattern that has played out in many European countries, as ostensibly grassroots far-right movements latch onto assorted issues – transgender rights, immigration, the place of Muslims in society, or Covid control measures and vaccination – and put pressure on democratic political systems with increasingly angry rhetoric and organised, sometimes violent protests.

While they often rail against their national governments’ policies, these movements have an increasingly transnational character. And across Europe and beyond, these factions now have a newly hospitable environment in which to communicate: the platform formerly known as Twitter.

Planet Musk

Since he took over the platform last year, Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk has become increasingly erratic and politically extreme, routinely engaging positively with racist and antisemitic users. According to Heidi Beirich, co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, the renaissance of Twitter/X as a haven for the far right is a major development.

“Every form of far-right extremist is using the platform now in ways that they only could before on unregulated sites like Telegram,” she told Euronews. 

“Musk has allowed prominent neo-Nazis and other white supremacists back on the platform, including very extreme people like Andrew Anglin of Daily Stormer, and they are pushing their ideas out there. The site is also monetising extremist material.

“This is true internationally as well. Our recent report on Generation Identity accounts on Twitter, which were pulled and then reinstated, shows the transnational reach of the problem.

“Twitter is an essential part of the far-right online ecosystem now, for raising money, recruiting and propagandising. It may well be the largest hate site on the internet at this point.”

The events on the streets of Dublin, which saw a tram and a bus attacked and many businesses looted, were heavily amplified online by local influencers with large followings on Twitter/X and international figures in the far-right ecosystem in the US and the UK.

But also getting involved was Musk himself, who engaged with extreme users trying to call attention tweeted that Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar “Hates Irish people” and complained that “The current Irish government clearly cares more about praise from woke media than their own people”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Into the mainstream

While its value has plummeted and advertisers are leaving, taking crucial revenue with them, the platform’s moderation policies have a huge impact on European countries. 

Unlike Telegram or other encrypted messaging apps, Twitter/X’s open nature means images, footage, false and misleading claims and hate speech can far more easily leach into public conversation – including via pickup from populist politicians and parties trying to appeal to receptive audiences.

And while none of Ireland’s very small far-right political parties have any hope of entering government any time soon, other countries have already seen their established ones embrace and fuel the anger on the far right, bringing outlandish and extreme ideas into the centre of electoral politics.

As for the future, Beirich warns that there are frightening scenarios in the offing – and that in many European countries, things are already well advanced down a dark path.

“What was fringe not too long ago has now breached the cordon sanitaire, especially when talking about immigration and Muslims,” she told Euronews. “We’ve just seen this in the Netherlands as well. The biggest tragedy would be if the AfD makes huge gains in the upcoming German elections.

ADVERTISEMENT

“At this point, there is little to distinguish say [French extremist politician Éric] Zemmour’s politics from the white supremacists in the Identitarian movement and many elements in Marine Le Pen’s party. I would argue the Finns Party, who are in coalition in Helsinki, are extremists that are already in power, meaning they have breached the mainstream. And Viktor Orbán’s government in Hungary is much the same.

“Unfortunately, the failure to take action against the far right online and off has now left us with extremism in the mainstream.”



Source link

#Europe #confronts #increasingly #transnational #farright #threat

Britain’s far right is booming on Elon Musk’s Twitter

Changes on the social media platform have been described as a “dream come true” for extremist parties.

Some people are pretty pleased with Twitter right now.

After US president Donald Trump caused a furore by retweeting its anti-Muslim content, one of the UK’s most notorious far-right groups Britain First was banned from the social media platform in 2017. Facebook followed suit months later.

Losing this huge reach crushed Britain First’s public visibility, membership and fundraising.

But that all changed when Elon Musk took over Twitter last October.

Calling himself a “free speech absolutist”, the tech billionaire granted an amnesty to hundreds of accounts that had been kicked off the platform.

Within hours, those belonging to Britain First leader Paul Golding, along with former deputy Jayda Fransen and the party itself, reappeared.

“We’re absolutely pleased,” Golding told Euronews. “Now that we’re back on Twitter, our following is growing very, very rapidly.

“The amount of people we’re reaching is huge. It’s millions all around the world.”

He claimed his Twitter following has lept from around 30,000 to more than 100,000 in little over two months since being reinstated.

“If the rate of growth carries on this way, I’ll be in the millions within a year or two,” Golding added.

“This is freedom of speech in action. This is democracy in action.”

‘Bogie man’

According to Golding, Britain First is a party of “patriotism, traditionalism, Christianity and national sovereignty,” with a current focus on “mass migration”.

However, the far-right party has been accused of promoting violence, hatred, sexism, racism and Islamophobia.

Golding was jailed in connection to a series of hate crimes against Muslims in 2018, with he and fellow supporters known to invade mosques and abuse worshippers.

“Britain First is a vile and hate-fuelled group whose sole purpose is to sow division,” London Mayor Sadiq Khan said following Golding’s online ban back in 2018. “Their sick intentions to incite hatred within our society via social media are reprehensible.”

Shut out from Twitter and Facebook, Britain First eked out an online existence on fringe platforms, where audiences are much smaller. But now it is back in the mainstream.

“Elon Musk… has made sure [Britain First’s] content is much more prominent on the platform,” head researcher Callum Hood at the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) told Euronews. “That’s a real helping hand to accounts like Golding’s.”

He explained that Britain First’s “extremely sharp” follower growth means an ever-increasing number of people are being exposed to his content that “foments hatred”.

Golding’s account also now carries a blue tick, formerly a badge of authenticity, giving his tweets “more credibility”, continued Hood – even though the only barrier to entry has become a “willingness to hand Elon Musk money”.

“That blue badge gives Golding a range of perks he has never had before. This is a dream come true for him.”

But Britain First isn’t the only hate group to benefit from Musk’s chaotic reworking of Twitter’s policies.

A report by the CCDH found the number of accounts pumping out toxic hate and abuse on Twitter has exploded since Musk’s takeover, with usage of slurs like the racist n-word soaring 202%.

‘His mission of whipping up division’

In an interview with Euronews, Golding claimed his content was not hateful, maintaining that his tweets – often a dozen per day – were “completely legal”.

“When the media or politicians talk about the word hate on social media, they mean political beliefs or opinions that they don’t like,” he said.

“The real reason we got closed down is that we were getting too big, our following was too large,” suggesting the British government pressured Twitter to do so.

There is no evidence to support Golding’s claim that the closure of his account was politically motivated. His platform was closed for repeated hate speech.

On what he called the “old Twitter”, the far-right leader alleged there was “blatant, naked censorship of opposing views”, which were replaced with “distorted narratives” on major political issues.

“That’s why Musk stepped in to restore freedom of speech. Now we can say what we want,” he told Euronews.

Yet Golding has been repeatedly called out for sharing outright fake or wildly misrepresented information, especially surrounding the recent unrest in France.

On 2 July, he shared a video of a group of armed and masked men, claiming rioters in France were “show[ing] off” their arsenal of weapons”.

Scrutiny by BBC verify journalist Shayan Sardarizadeh revealed the footage in the tweet – which was viewed more than a million times – showed men in Dijon from 2020 defending their neighbourhood after a teen was assaulted by a rival gang.

It remains on his page despite being flagged as false.

Even Golding himself recognised that not everything he posts is always accurate.

“If we see a video that’s trending and it says this is happening in France and it looks shocking, then we will share it,” he said. 

“Sometimes we get stung with inaccurate videos.”

But, according to Hood, this does not mean the group is simply inept.

“If you look at the content Golding produces that has been quite successful on social media it is toxic, dangerous, rubbish,” he said. 

“They [Britain First] know exactly what they’re doing. They create controversial content, with a complete disregard for the facts, that whips up hatred of minorities.”

“Fortunately, on today’s Twitter, that is a recipe for success,” he added.

‘This stuff causes harm’

Golding may have a blasé attitude towards the truth, but digital hate and misinformation have real – and deadly – real-world consequences.

Dangerous protests outside asylum centres have broken out in the UK, at times on the basis of completely fabricated stories, and online content can help agitate violence against many different groups in society. 

At the same time, as social media grows more vitriol-ridden, it is actually stifling freedom of speech online, with many groups increasingly driven off the platform by abuse, Hood told Euronews.

He claims the boundaries of acceptable speech on Twitter are now largely dependent on the “whims of Elon Musk by diktat”.

“That is clearly a worse situation for freedom of speech,” he adds.

Musk has repeatedly deleted accounts that are critical of him, including one which tracked all of his private jet flights.

Back on Twitter, Golding believed Britain First had a “very promising future”.

“Musk has put all political parties not just Britain and first of all political parties in Britain on an equal and level playing field. Five years down the line, we will see who’s popular and who isn’t.”



Source link

#Britains #booming #Elon #Musks #Twitter

RFK Jr. And Elon Musk: Two Great Dicks That Taste Like Sh*t!

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sure has come a long way from 2014, when he angered fossil fuel lobbyists by saying that climate change deniers should be jailed. Or maybe not such a long way; by 2005 he was already spreading the anti-vax gospel and falsely claiming that childhood vaccines cause autism. And now he’s running for president and everyone is reminding you what a complete freakass whackaloon he is.

We’ll do our part. Hey, remember that long-ago time in 2022 when he said, of COVID vaccine mandates, that at least in Nazi Germany “you could cross the Alps into Switzerland, you could hide in an attic like Anne Frank did.”

Kennedy did his part to help out that educational endeavor Monday night by sitting down with chief Twitter troll Elon Musk, who seems to love conspiratorial bullshit nearly as much as Kennedy does. He started out by thanking Musk for ending all the terrible “censorship” on the platform — by making it a free-for all for COVID and vaccine disinformation, not to mention for Nazis, far-Right conspiracy theories, and rampant hatred of transgender people, but also by actually censoring people on behalf of authoritarian governments. Kennedy also explained that in 2021, “the government pressured Mark Zuckerberg” to ban him from Instagram, although now his account has been restored because he’s running for president. Talk about ineffective censorship!


Rolling Stone reports that for the first 40 minutes of the Twitter Spaces chat, Kennedy barely talked about his candidacy, because he and Musk were too busy telling each other how much they admired each other for being courageous and shit, which is honestly what free speech is for.

At one point, Kennedy asked where Musk got the courage to be like one of America’s Founders by being “willing to take this huge, massive, unspeakable economic hit on behalf of a principle for a country in which you weren’t even born?” Musk, who does kind of have US citizenship after all, replied, “I should say I do very much consider myself an American.” Musk also acknowledged that advertisers had deserted the platform because he was so very committed to democracy, at least for people who think he’s cool, so it’s been “frankly a struggle to break even” (he is not breaking even) and then everyone with an $8 blue checkmark felt very warm that they had done their part to save America and/or Twitter.

After they both agreed that free speech is the very best, and that they both really love free speech the most, Kennedy bemoaned the sad fact that “we’re no longer living in a democratic system,” because Big Pharma controls the government and silences brave advocates of medical disinformation, which would explain why we only hear from anti-vaxxers everywhere on social media but not yet in (most) doctors’ offices.

Among other great trolls, Musk and Kennedy were joined by Tulsi Gabbard and Michael Shellenberger, author of books about how environmentalism is bad for everyone and global warming is happening but is honestly no big deal, yeesh, calm down. UPDATE/CORRECTION: I initially had a brain fart and confused Shellenberger with a different “contrarian” dipshit, Alex Berenson, formerly of the New York Times. Wonkette regrets the error.

Kennedy and Musk agreed that America shouldn’t be supporting the Ukrainian government, since as Kennedy put it, the Ukrainian people are “almost equally” victimized by America as by Russians. Musk added that the war was kind of our fault anyway, since “We are sending the flower of Ukrainian youth and Russian youth to die in the trenches, and it’s morally reprehensible,” and when you think about it, we probably shouldn’t be ordering Russia’s youth flowers around like that, how would we like it huh?

The conversation got even more sane when Gabbard added that

the U.S. had turned Ukraine into a “slaughterhouse” and blamed the conflict on an “elitist cabal of war-mongers” who had seized control of the Democratic Party.

Those war-mongers, Kennedy warned, hadn’t just taken control of the Democratic party: They were in control of the Deep State as well.

He recalled being told by Donald Trump’s former CIA Director Mike Pompeo that the “top layer of that agency is made up almost entirely of people who do not believe in the American institutions of democracy,” which is pretty rich coming from a top guy in the Trump administration.

Kennedy also said he opposed an assault weapons ban, because the Second Amendment is pretty awesome, and anyway, the problem isn’t guns, it’s antidepressant meds, which turn people into mass shooters, explaining that

“prior to the introduction of Prozac, we had almost none of these events in our country. […] The one thing that we have, it’s different than anybody in the world, is the amount of psychiatric drugs our children are taking.” He then alleged that the National Institutes of Health won’t research the supposed link between these drugs and shootings “because they’re working with the pharmaceutical industry.”

It’s pretty convincing until you remember that antidepressants are prescribed worldwide, but in countries where there aren’t more guns than people, there aren’t a bunch of school shootings. Also, maybe someone could have pointed out that only about a quarter of mass shooters use antidepressants, while 100 percent of them use firearms, albeit not usually with a doctor’s prescription.

Along the way, Kennedy also insisted that COVID was a “bioweapon,” lied that after the passage of the Affordable Care Act the “Democrats were getting more money from pharma than Republicans” (it’s the other way around, according to STAT News, but then STAT News believes vaccines work), and promised to go to the US-Mexico border to “try to formulate policies that will seal the border permanently,” so he really sounds like the mainstream Democrat that everyone on the far Right has been looking for, the end and OPEN THREAD.

[Rolling Stone / Insider / NYT]

Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. If you can, please give $5 or $10 a month so we can keep this little mommyblog going!

Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.



Source link

#RFK #Elon #Musk #Great #Dicks #Taste #Sht

Louisiana Wingnut Rep. Clay Higgins Bulldozes Protester. WHAR ASSAULT CHARGES?

Rightwing Republican congressman Clay Higgins of Louisiana — known around these parts as the ‘WHAR BOXES?’ guy, or simply WHAR BOXES — took it upon himself to play bouncer Wednesday when a young protester got a little too mouthy during a press conference being held by prominent House Wingnut Caucus members including Higgins, Lauren Boebert (R-Colorado), Paul Gosar DDS (R-Arizona) and others. (Higgins later tweeted that the presser was about the very real threat to US sovereignty posed by the World Health Organization, which is part of the UN One-World Communist Plot, which seems like indispensable context.)

The protester, law student and organizer/troublemaker Jake Burdett, 25, told the Daily Beast he’d actually been in DC for a Medicare for All rally led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), but when that was over, he saw the Freedom Caulkers setting up and decided to be a free speech pest, which is his right as an American citizen.

Spotting Gosar and Boebert, he decided to stick around. “I figured I’d ask them some tough questions,” he said. “Bird-dog them, whatever you want to call it.”

And indeed, as Burdett’s videos show, he was definitely heckling the rightwing dipshits, which may happen when politicians hold a “press conference” in public.


In the first video, Burdett shouts questions while Gosar is speaking, asking about his appearance at a confab held by neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes, and about that embarrassing campaign ad made by Gosar’s own siblings, urging people not to vote for him. As Freedom Cockups try to tell Burdett to leave, Higgins steps in to promise he’ll answer all Burdett’s questions later (about Gosar, sure!) if the young man will just stop recording and be quiet. Higgins does get right up in Burdett’s face to deliver that offer of help.

In the first video, Higgins fairly calmly introduces himself and says, “All I’m asking you to do is just peacefully stand by with your camera and I promise you — look at me — I’ll come talk to you straight up and answer all your questions. Fair enough?”

And yes, Burdett wanted to know how on earth Higgins would be in a position to know anything about Gosar’s very public embarrassment.

But Burdett hadda go and persist. While Boebert spoke, he asked her about her divorce, and asked her whether it was at all related to that time in 2017 when her restaurant customers got diarrhea from tainted pork sliders. Sure, it was a rude, nonsensical, pesky question. And goddamn it, it was also perfectly legal because this is America and we can ask rude stupid questions of our elected leaders in public, Crom bless our First Amendment!

And because we are indeed a nation of laws, our elected leaders are not allowed to assault us just for being annoying, although that’s what Higgins did. Here’s video from another angle, showing Higgins grabbing Burdett to eject him (nearly knocking over another person in the audience) and manhandling Burdett away from the speakers all the way to the sidewalk.

Burdett wasn’t harmed or arrested; he told the Daily Beast that he was questioned for about a half hour by Capitol Police and told he could go. But he was certainly none too happy that the Capitol Cops didn’t seem very interested in hearing him tell them he’d been assaulted by a member of Congress.

“It’s one thing for anybody to do that,” he said of Higgins’ behavior. “But for a sitting U.S. congressperson to think that that’s OK—it just shows an extra level of entitlement, that they feel they’re untouchable and the law doesn’t apply to them.”

For his part, Higgins, a former sheriff who loves to act the Tough Guy, later took to Twitter to lie about the encounter, claiming that Burdett was “a 103M” (police code for “disturbance by a mental person,” never mind the bad English usage) and insisting in an attached video that Burdett (an “agitator activist”) was “very disruptive and threatening, in violation of the law.”

Higgins gives himself credit in the video for having “successfully de-escalated the situation,” a phrase with which we’re certain the Inigo Montoya meme would take issue. He also claims that Burdett “aggressively disrupted” Boebert and “approached her in a threatening manner,” which just isn’t the case. He was rude and shouty, not threatening.

Say, is this a good place to mention that in 2007, Higgins, then in law enforcement, was accused of beating up an innocent bystander to an arrest, and then lying to Internal affairs to cover it up? The former cop also busted for helping with that alleged cover-up is now a congressional aide to Higgins. Higgins resigned before he could be punished for that incident.

Burdett told the Daily Beast that he’s now “evaluating my options” and that “if it looks like there is a strong case for assault and [there is] an attorney willing to take on the case, I am absolutely prepared to press charges.” On Twitter, when Burdett asked for any attorneys to tell him if they thought he had a case, civil rights attorney Andrew C. Laufer replied, “Yes, assault, battery, and a potential civil rights violation.”

Former US Attorney and current MSNBC legal commentator Joyce Vance was succinct: “Looks like an assault to me?”

[Daily Beast / Lafayette Daily Advertiser / Salon / Nola.com]

Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations! If you can, please give $5 or $10 monthly so we can keep bringing you the hard-hitting news of tough guy members of Congress taking fascism into their own hands.

Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.



Source link

#Louisiana #Wingnut #Rep #Clay #Higgins #Bulldozes #Protester #WHAR #ASSAULT #CHARGES

‘Moms For Liberty’ Now Against Mother’s Day

Someday when the current wave of ridiculous moral panics subsides (and is replaced by some other shiny new ridiculous moral panic), the rightwing astroturf book-banning group “Moms for Liberty” will have an entire wing devoted to it in the Museum Of Why We Can’t Have Nice Things. Since the group’s founding in 2021 — initially for the purpose of hounding one Florida woman who beat co-founder Tina Descovich in a Brevard County school board election — the Mad Moms have become fulltime combatants in the Culture Wars, seeking to ban books about the Civil Rights Movement because they accurately depicted white opponents of integration as bigots, challenging scores of books at a time so they’ll be pulled from shelves under Florida’s ban-first policy, and occasionally fantasizing about gunning down librarians who are luring children into reading books containing Wrongthink.

Previously!

ACHTUNG! TN Moms Have Found The Critical Race Theory, And It Is Ruby Bridges’ Children’s Book!

100 Year Old Lady At Florida School Board Better Patriot Than All Book Banners Put Together

‘Moms For Liberty’ Leader Wistfully Shares Dream Of Gunning Down Librarians

Naturally enough, a Tennessee chapter of the Moms For Purity has now declared victory against a Chattanooga school librarian who attempted to destroy America by proposing a Mother’s Day book presentation aimed at teaching that families come in all shapes, including families with one, two, or zero mommies. The Washington Post’sGreg Sargent (gift linky) explains:

Caroline Mickey, the librarian at Alpine Crest Elementary School outside Chattanooga, just learned this the hard way, when her idea for a Mother’s Day-themed lesson came under sudden and heavy fire from parents in the area. The vitriol of the attack, and the school district superintendent’s rapid decision to cancel her lesson in response, caught her off guard.

“It was overwhelming,” Mickey told me. “I didn’t realize it was going to be quite this intense.”

Ms. Mickey — already a suspicious character since she shares a name with a dangerous groomer mouse in Florida — sent a notice to parents that she had planned a pre-Mother’s lesson that would be “sensitive to the fact that not all students live with a mother” and that would “[celebrate] those who fill the motherly roles in our lives: those who make our lunches, who kiss away our hurts, and who teach us to fly.”

No, that’s not sweet, it’s indoctrination, because only REAL mothers can do that, and besides, I learned to fly from an FAA certified flight instructor; my mother wouldn’t know an aileron from a baguette.


Ms. Mickey planned to read two books aloud on the theme; Miriam B. Schiffer’s Stella Brings the Family, a tale of a little girl who’s worried about her school’s Mother’s Day party because she has two dads, and Ryan T. Higgins’s Mother Bruce, a goofy story about a grumpy bear whose Uber Eats order goes terribly wrong and is sent a bunch of goose eggs that aren’t boiled, but instead hatch, and so the goslings treat him as their momma. In the Wonkette Sekrit Chatcave, Rebecca said it’s a darling book, and Evan said he was pretty sure he’s known at least one bear named Bruce. “‘Why are these goddamned goslings following me?’ said Bruce, yeah sounds about right.”

The reaction from Moms for White Evangelical Nationalism — to the school activity, not to Evan — was swift and furious. On a local message board, one woman accused Mickey of trying to “erase motherhood on Mother’s Day,” explaining that only women are mothers, and if a man is a caregiver, he’s a father, and look what’s happening to our “once wonderful” local school with all this indoctrination! (She also took issue with the library website’s “Reading changes your life” slogan, because why is the library trying to change children, huh?)

The rant even got angry about the notice that parents could opt out if they wanted, because “Why are opted out students, whose parents believe in traditional family values, going to be moved to another location so as to not disturb the supposed feelings of others?” And will the alternative lesson plan teach the “biblical definition of gender,” or some other horror?

The piece closes, “Please pray for the children of Hamilton County. The schools are coming after their hearts” and for good measure cites that line from Luke about how anyone who would lead children astray should “have a millstone hung around his neck and to be thrown into the sea.”

The note was followed by a distraught statement from Tonya Dodd, the local Moms for Liberty chair, who insisted that both books wouldn’t even be fit for middle schoolers, let alone second graders, because of all that gay and gender and evildoing, and also the “Social Emotional Learning (Cultural Marxism).” Dodd warned the school board that “As elected officials, you know you are appointed by God and you should be doing everything you can to keep children safe in their learning environment,” which, if you want to be technical, is not how school board elections actually work.

For extra cluelessness points, the Mad Moms chair complains that the librarian could have instead chosen books to

represent women who are moms that may not have given birth to their children; such as, grandmothers, aunts, stepmoms, adoptive moms, or any women that may be a mom to a child.

Which is actually pretty much the point of Stella Brings the Family, in which Stella’s friend suggests she invite both dads, her Nona, her uncle, her aunt, and a cousin, and everyone has a fine time except for the one kid who stands up, calls them all heathens and groomers, and says the Proud Boys are his real mother. (I am not allowed to write children’s books.)

The Post reports that some loving Christian parents in the area sent Ms. Mickey “long rambling rants” in emails in which they declared her a “groomer” and a literal enemy of motherhood.

Worse, as the Tennessee Holler tweeted, Mickey’s superintendent, Justin Robertson, didn’t even make a token attempt to defend her, and instead apologized and cancelled the lesson. No word on whether the books have yet been pulled from the school library.

Following the publication of the WaPo story, Dodd, the Moms for Censorship chair, took to Twitter today to reflect on her “success” and how lots of mean people not even from Chattanooga thought they had any right to have an opinion on the matter, but thank goodness she and her supporters fought against the ugly attempt to erase motherhood.

“Keep on cloud seeding and geoengeneering and see what happens. It never fails we have clear nice days, then a day full of trails in the sky, then crazy weather.”

Mind you, that was several hours after a middle-of-the night reply to a local TV weather report in which Dodd suggested that chemtrails are causing “crazy weather,” so thank goodness we have very calm normal people influencing what’s taught in schools.

OPEN THREAD.

[Washington Post (gift link) / Vice News / Chattanoogan]

Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. If you can, please help us out with a monthly donation of $5 or $10 so we can protect children from losing their libraries, and to keep you up on who’s worried about all the geoengineering and chemtrails.

Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.



Source link

#Moms #Liberty #Mothers #Day

CBC #TwitterFiles? The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation tried to get Twitter to censor critics (video)

This isn’t about an official ‘Twitter Files’ report, but it is very similar. Rebel News, a conservative-leaning, pro-free-expression news platform in Canada has obtained documents showing how the CBC used its money and cozy relationships with the Canadian government to try to force Twitter to censor its critics.

You will recall that Elon Musk labelled the CBC as 69% government funded (heh)—so that would be public money that they were threatening to withhold.

Seriously, the report is only part of the show and is worth watching in its entirety:

The thread also posts many of the documents:

Indeed, Twitter Files veteran Matt Taibbi lent a helping hand:

The reactions were swift:

Heh.

We aren’t surprised, either, but it is nice to have proof.

The Canadian Constitution says ‘Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication.’ That sounds good enough but, in practice, their conception of freedom of expression is pinched compared to America’s.

We concur.

They mentioned about five blanked out pages. I wonder if Twitter has a copy of them on their hard drive?

Notice also, there are also the constant calls on Twitter to censor itself, because government regulation would be worse. This is a common tactic for imposing censorship when the government might not get away with doing it directly. For instance, the Motion Picture Association of America didn’t want to institute a ratings system for American movies, but explicitly cited the fear that the government would try to regulate them as the reason why they instituted one. The same can be said for the Entertainment Software Ratings Board or ESRB which rates video games and the Comics Code Authority which stifled creativity in comic books for years. The latter contained absolute prohibitions that lasted for decades which included rules like:

Crimes shall never be presented in such a way as to create sympathy for the criminal, to promote distrust of the forces of law and justice, or to inspire others with a desire to imitate criminals.

Policemen, judges, Government officials and respected institutions shall never be presented in such a way as to create disrespect for established authority.

Special precautions to avoid references to physical afflictions or deformities shall be taken.

Divorce shall not be treated humorously nor represented as desirable.

One might feel that these different ratings boards and even the content restrictions slapped on comic books are a good idea, but they should never be adopted facing down the barrel of government regulation. They should be adopted freely, with at most social and economic pressure from parents, not the government.

Further, these tactics are insidious. One might say, for instance, “if you are a game company, why not just fight any regulations?” The answer is that it costs money to have that fight, so even assuming they would win, they would be out the costs associated with litigation—and that assumes they would win. The Supreme Court has not always been very supportive of free speech in modern forms of communication. So, yes, self-regulation might be better, except when we consider the damage done to freedom of expression.

It’s also an answer to the David Frenchs of the world who pretend all this social media censorship we have seen in the last few years is just private action. Very often it is actually the product of government pressure.

Finally, readers with long memories will remember the name Ezra Levant from his own struggles with Canadian censorship:

The CBC almost sounds disappointed.

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!



Source link

#CBC #TwitterFiles #Canadian #Broadcasting #Corporation #Twitter #censor #critics #video

eToro-Twitter Deal is ‘Marketing Only’ Agreement, Says UK MD

The news of the tie-in of Twitter and eToro has made a splash in the tech space, indicating Musk’s ambitions to create the “everything app”. In the retail trading industry, many were curious about the nuts and bolts of the deal, which can be meaningful for pretty much every major broker and provider. The terms were famously not disclosed, but Finance Magnates sat down with eToro’s UK Managing Director Dan Moczulski, to get a glimpse into its facets.

Asked whether any user data could be shared between the two platforms, Mr Moczulski stated, “No, nothing. It’s a marketing deal at the moment.”

And, on the subject of KYC checks, he explained: “What’s not happening is, you click on Twitter, on $APPL, and suddenly, if you’re not an eToro user, you get the ability to buy or sell Apple.

“Actually, you land on eToro, you see Apple prices, you see an Apple chart, but if you want to become an eToro client, you have to go through KYC the same as anybody else.”

The $BTC cashtag result on Twitter

Asked whether the integration was more similar to the relationship between an advertiser (eToro) and a media platform (Twitter), or more like an arrangement by which Twitter can take a share of the revenue from eToro, Moczulski replied, “It’s most definitely the former,” and confirmed that this kind of arrangement is straightforward with regulators, going on to explain, with regard to how the partnership might develop in the future.

“This is eToro using Twitter’s infrastructure to market the services of eToro. Any other kind of speculation on the future motivations of Twitter is for them to decide.

“But who knows? Obviously, there’s a line of communication that’s been developed now, but certainly, at the moment, it’s for us to help Twitter users find more information about stuff that they might be interested in.”

There has been speculation about the possibility of Elon Musk, at some point, moving to make an investment or purchase offer to eToro, to build out his proposed everything app, but Mr Moczulski made clear that this is simply guesswork on the part of commentators.

“[The partnership] has struck a chord with people who are making those kinds of predictions, but at the moment, these are just predictions. It’s the early days of a marketing agreement, but I think we can assert that there’s a real synergy between the person who uses fintwit, and the person who uses eToro”.

Mr Moczulski elaborated that “This is why it all makes sense for us because there is that synergy with people that want breaking financial news and want to share breaking financial news. We really are built from the ground up as this social investing network. We encourage people to write about assets, we encourage people to engage with other users on the platform. You can see what other users invest in.”

Mr. Moczulski also summarized why he believes that eToro is uniquely distinct from other platforms:

“I can’t think of another broker that has that social spin on it. And even if it does, it doesn’t have the liquidity that we have, with 31 million users.”

Etoro registered user growth

Crypto Regulation in Europe and the UK

Mr Moczulski supports clearer and more robust crypto regulation, recognizing that any regulation must “support the individual, but allow them to engage in capital markets.”

Regarding the regulatory mood in Europe and the UK, he explained that:

“Even from a political position, I think the UK wants to be at the table for the crypto industry, it wants to be involved, it wants to be engaged, and I think that’s true for the EU too. I’m sure we’ll get there, I’m just not quite sure how long it’ll take us.”

Regarding the broader direction of movement, which appears to be towards greater acceptance of crypto, Mr Moczulski stated:

“From the political process, the Treasury, even from the FCA, there’s an acceptance that this is where we’re going, and we have to bring it in-house, and we have to regulate it correctly and strongly.”

Freeing Up Information

Mr Moczulski also described how attitudes towards finance and investment have changed in the UK:

“If I look back ten or fifteen years, you have this cliche that the only financial conversation that people would have with friends at a dinner party was about the value of their houses.

“Now in society we’re very happy to talk about the investments we have, to talk about the stocks we’ve got that have done well, to talk about the coins that have done badly.

“So I think as a society, within finance, we’re much happier sharing information, and I think that’s a good thing.”

Discussing possible wider industry effects resulting from the partnership between eToro and Twitter, Mr Moczulski suggested:

“Financial investing is most definitely a mainstream activity. I think this tie-in recognizes that actually the number of people that are interested in financial markets, and interested in engaging in financial markets, is far higher than you might assume.

“And in terms of what fintwit is, and how successful it is, well, it’s definitely there, and people are using it as a mechanism to share information, and to talk to others.”

With regard to concerns voiced by some observers about social media’s capacity to spark or exacerbate extreme crowd behavior (such as, for example, the kind of bank run that affected Silicon Valley Bank), Mr Moczulski views the power of social media from a wider and more optimistic perspective:

“I can’t get away from the idea that sharing information, and giving people access to more information, quickly, have to be good things. It has to be qualified, and I think maybe this eToro tie-up helps to do that as well, it helps people to qualify information.”

That outlook does, though, come with some important caveats.

“There’s a level of education that we generally have to have, regardless. Just because you’ve seen something on a Facebook feed or a Twitter post, you’ve got to do your own research on the back of it, and there’s a level of risk attached to any kind of investment. But I think information should be out there for people to engage with, and we should have a framework that encourages people to get engaged with information and knowledge responsibly.”

The news of the tie-in of Twitter and eToro has made a splash in the tech space, indicating Musk’s ambitions to create the “everything app”. In the retail trading industry, many were curious about the nuts and bolts of the deal, which can be meaningful for pretty much every major broker and provider. The terms were famously not disclosed, but Finance Magnates sat down with eToro’s UK Managing Director Dan Moczulski, to get a glimpse into its facets.

Asked whether any user data could be shared between the two platforms, Mr Moczulski stated, “No, nothing. It’s a marketing deal at the moment.”

And, on the subject of KYC checks, he explained: “What’s not happening is, you click on Twitter, on $APPL, and suddenly, if you’re not an eToro user, you get the ability to buy or sell Apple.

“Actually, you land on eToro, you see Apple prices, you see an Apple chart, but if you want to become an eToro client, you have to go through KYC the same as anybody else.”

The $BTC cashtag result on Twitter

Asked whether the integration was more similar to the relationship between an advertiser (eToro) and a media platform (Twitter), or more like an arrangement by which Twitter can take a share of the revenue from eToro, Moczulski replied, “It’s most definitely the former,” and confirmed that this kind of arrangement is straightforward with regulators, going on to explain, with regard to how the partnership might develop in the future.

“This is eToro using Twitter’s infrastructure to market the services of eToro. Any other kind of speculation on the future motivations of Twitter is for them to decide.

“But who knows? Obviously, there’s a line of communication that’s been developed now, but certainly, at the moment, it’s for us to help Twitter users find more information about stuff that they might be interested in.”

There has been speculation about the possibility of Elon Musk, at some point, moving to make an investment or purchase offer to eToro, to build out his proposed everything app, but Mr Moczulski made clear that this is simply guesswork on the part of commentators.

“[The partnership] has struck a chord with people who are making those kinds of predictions, but at the moment, these are just predictions. It’s the early days of a marketing agreement, but I think we can assert that there’s a real synergy between the person who uses fintwit, and the person who uses eToro”.

Mr Moczulski elaborated that “This is why it all makes sense for us because there is that synergy with people that want breaking financial news and want to share breaking financial news. We really are built from the ground up as this social investing network. We encourage people to write about assets, we encourage people to engage with other users on the platform. You can see what other users invest in.”

Mr. Moczulski also summarized why he believes that eToro is uniquely distinct from other platforms:

“I can’t think of another broker that has that social spin on it. And even if it does, it doesn’t have the liquidity that we have, with 31 million users.”

Etoro registered user growth

Crypto Regulation in Europe and the UK

Mr Moczulski supports clearer and more robust crypto regulation, recognizing that any regulation must “support the individual, but allow them to engage in capital markets.”

Regarding the regulatory mood in Europe and the UK, he explained that:

“Even from a political position, I think the UK wants to be at the table for the crypto industry, it wants to be involved, it wants to be engaged, and I think that’s true for the EU too. I’m sure we’ll get there, I’m just not quite sure how long it’ll take us.”

Regarding the broader direction of movement, which appears to be towards greater acceptance of crypto, Mr Moczulski stated:

“From the political process, the Treasury, even from the FCA, there’s an acceptance that this is where we’re going, and we have to bring it in-house, and we have to regulate it correctly and strongly.”

Freeing Up Information

Mr Moczulski also described how attitudes towards finance and investment have changed in the UK:

“If I look back ten or fifteen years, you have this cliche that the only financial conversation that people would have with friends at a dinner party was about the value of their houses.

“Now in society we’re very happy to talk about the investments we have, to talk about the stocks we’ve got that have done well, to talk about the coins that have done badly.

“So I think as a society, within finance, we’re much happier sharing information, and I think that’s a good thing.”

Discussing possible wider industry effects resulting from the partnership between eToro and Twitter, Mr Moczulski suggested:

“Financial investing is most definitely a mainstream activity. I think this tie-in recognizes that actually the number of people that are interested in financial markets, and interested in engaging in financial markets, is far higher than you might assume.

“And in terms of what fintwit is, and how successful it is, well, it’s definitely there, and people are using it as a mechanism to share information, and to talk to others.”

With regard to concerns voiced by some observers about social media’s capacity to spark or exacerbate extreme crowd behavior (such as, for example, the kind of bank run that affected Silicon Valley Bank), Mr Moczulski views the power of social media from a wider and more optimistic perspective:

“I can’t get away from the idea that sharing information, and giving people access to more information, quickly, have to be good things. It has to be qualified, and I think maybe this eToro tie-up helps to do that as well, it helps people to qualify information.”

That outlook does, though, come with some important caveats.

“There’s a level of education that we generally have to have, regardless. Just because you’ve seen something on a Facebook feed or a Twitter post, you’ve got to do your own research on the back of it, and there’s a level of risk attached to any kind of investment. But I think information should be out there for people to engage with, and we should have a framework that encourages people to get engaged with information and knowledge responsibly.”



Source link

#eToroTwitter #Deal #Marketing #Agreement

‘Bring me his head’: The frightening Twitter hunt for a Saudi dissident in exile

When a former colonel in the Saudi police force, now seeking asylum in the United Kingdom, took to TikTok in mid-March to explain live why he had left the police, internet vigilantes immediately put a price on his head. In the time since, a horde of Twitter accounts has been harassing the 44-year-old online, calling him a “traitor” and “doxxing” him, revealing information about his whereabouts. He says he now fears for his life.

“The threats are coming from all angles: TikTok, YouTube, Twitter… They want to kill me before I get political asylum in the United Kingdom,” Rabih Alenezi, a former colonel with the Saudi police, told the FRANCE 24 Observers team by telephone. 

Alenezi is living in a constant state of fear in a location that he has managed, for the time being, to keep secret. His terror has become more acute since a mysterious Twitter account offered 10,000 Saudi riyals (around 2,400) to anyone who had information on his whereabouts. 


Rabih Alenezi Published This Video On His Twitter Account On March 7, 2023, Announcing His Decision To Leave The Saudi Police. Since Then, His Account Has Been Pirated And All Of The Content Removed. The Video Has Since Been Republished By The Media Outlet Middle East Eye.

I got to the United Kingdom in February. It wasn’t my original plan to stay in the UK and live here. However, I was already shocked by the human rights situation in Saudi Arabia.

Two weeks after my arrival in the UK, I published a video where I spoke about the reasons that I was leaving the security forces. I resigned mid-broadcast. I immediately got a wave of online harassment, but I said, what the hell, I can keep doing my videos. 

NOTE: Since the publication of this article in French on April 7, 2023, the Twitter account at the origin of the harassment of Alenezi, “Fahad Bin Sattam” (@fahadnoic), has been deleted. 

A manhunt unfolds on Twitter

On March 17, Rabih Alenezi’s Twitter account was hacked. His tweets criticizing the regime were erased and, in their place, the account was flooded with photos of Mohamed Bin Salman, the crown prince of the Saudi kingdom.  

On March 17, Rabih Alenezi’s Twitter account was hacked. His tweets criticising the regime were erased and, in their place, the account was flooded with photos of Mohamed Bin Salman, the crown prince of the Saudi kingdom. 

The nightmare really began for Rabih Alenezi on March 22. That day, he went to a restaurant in central London and started a live stream on TikTok. Among the 5,000 people following him, the Twitter account “Fahad Bin Sattam” (@fahadnoic – since deleted) boasted that he had been able to locate the former colonel’s position and tweeted to his followers: “I’m live. Give me a few minutes, I’ll get him kicked out of the cafe.”

In this video, which Rabih Alenezi streamed live on TikTok on March 22, 2023, you can hear the restaurant manager asking him to stop filming. The manager says that people have called the restaurant to complain about Alenezi’s comments and that “The restaurant doesn’t want to be associated with political topics”. © Observers

About 45 minutes into the live stream, a waiter interrupts Alenezi to tell him that the restaurant has received complaints and asks him to stop the broadcast. In an excerpt from the video, the restaurant manager is heard explaining that the restaurant had received calls from people complaining about this “kind of political speech”. Alenezi then stops his live broadcast.

On Twitter, “Fahad Bin Sattam” confirmed that he had called the restaurant several times to “denounce” his compatriot. He tweeted an excerpt from Alenezi’s TikTok live stream, addressing the former colonel directly: “I will always be after you… This time it was a restaurant, but next time it will be your home.”

Bin Sattam’s followers commended him for his “patriotic efforts”. One of them wrote: “Traitors, and especially those who are military, deserve the edge of the sword.”

In a video filmed in the street on March 23, Rabih Alenezi talks about the restaurant incident. 

On March 23, Alenezi started streaming from another café in London. “Fahad Bin Sattam” doxxed Alenezi again – determining the location were he was filming. However, by that time, Alenezi had left the café. 

On March 27, “Fahad Bin Sattam” posted a Tweet offering 10,000 Saudi riyals (2,400) to “anyone who had information about this individual, with the following information: he is renting a studio in London, probably in Kensington”. He added images of the inside of the apartment where the former colonel was staying, taken from his TikTok videos. 

On March 27, “Fahad Bin Sattam” posted a sort of wanted ad online, offering 10,000 Saudi riyals (2,400 euros) to anyone with information about the former colonel.
On March 27, “Fahad Bin Sattam” posted a sort of wanted ad online, offering 10,000 Saudi riyals (2,400 euros) to anyone with information about the former colonel. © Observers

Three days later, the account told its followers to focus on trying to find the property where Alenezi was staying on British housing sites Zoopla Property or OnTheMarket. He said he’d offer 5,000 riyals (1,200) extra to “the first person to find him before me”. 

Hundreds of Saudi accounts participate in the manhunt

Hundreds of tweets praised “Fahad Bin Sattam” for what he was doing. 

“Brother Sattam, please accept an additional 1,000 riyals (200) from me to add to the 10,000 riyals (€2,400) you’re already offering,” one tweet offered. 

“His body language betrays his terror. He is feeling his neck, which will be separated from his body,” another account tweeted.

At the urging of the “Fahan Bin Sattam” account, many followers joined Alenezi’s live streams on TikTok, filling the comments sections with threats and insults. “Sattam” then published screengrabs of the insults on Twitter. 

“He blocked me, that b*****d! I really pissed him off with my comments: he didn’t want to read the truth,” said one social media user of Alenezi. 

Others were busy doxxing Alenezi, sharing the coordinates of his possible locations.

Another social media user suggested this possible location for the dissident, using the results of a search on a British housing site.
Another social media user suggested this possible location for the dissident, using the results of a search on a British housing site. © Observers

No action from Twitter, despite multiple reports

A number of social media users, defending Alenezi’s right to freedom of expression, said that they reported “Fahad Bin Sattam’s” threatening messages to Twitter, arguing that he was inciting violence and hate. 

On March 28, “Fahad Bin Sattam” revealed that someone in Germany had reported his tweet offering the 10,000 riyal (€2,400) reward, but that Twitter had decided that the tweet didn’t violate Twitter rules or German law. 


Our team contacted Twitter’s security services several times for comment. However, the only response we got was the “poop” emoji, which Elon Musk announced on March 19 would be the automatic response to press requests.

‘Any minute, I fear that a masked man will appear at my door to kill me’

Rabih Alenezi continued: 

Right now, I am doing my best to limit contact with strangers, especially any Arabs. I don’t go to the mosque, I’m really anxious. 

When the “Fahad Bin Sattam” account located the hotel where I was staying on March 27, I changed my address immediately. Then he found the street where I was staying and I left again, shortly after his tweet. 

I’m afraid that, at any moment, a masked man will come to my door and kill me. 

I was passing by a café when a man yelled out “traitor!” in Arabic. I’m sure that he was talking about me.

They [the trolls] became terrified after my posts, as if I was an imminent danger to the Kingdom, but all I did was talk about my experience [in the police] and express my opinion.

They say I am a coward and a traitor. They demand: “Bring me his head”.

As a rule, no one dares to publicly threaten a colonel without the consent or direct order of the Saudi authorities, at the risk of being arrested and thrown in jail… Which leads me to believe that this Twitter account is supported by the regime. 

‘I have witnessed police raids on civilians’ homes at night, I have seen police officers dragging a woman out of her home in the middle of the night’

In Saudi Arabia, a tweet criticising the regime can land you in prison. You can get up to 30 years in prison for criticising a ministry or even a law. The Saudi regime is no longer afraid of international condemnation. We saw this with the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi or the conviction of Saad Ibrahim Almadi for a few tweets criticising the regime [Editor’s note: sentenced to 19 years in prison when visiting family in Riyadh, Almadi, a Saudi-American, was released in March 2023, but is banned from travelling], and they were both living abroad.

In April 2022, I was assigned to spy on Shiite worshippers during the month of Ramadan in Al Qatif, in the east of the country. The regime wanted to stir up public opinion against these Shiite tribes who were demanding their rights. But I used a family holiday as an excuse not to go. In 2020, I also managed to get out of another mission to repress demonstrations in Tabuk, in the northwest [due to tensions between local tribes and the authorities over a controversial urban expansion project]. I said I was sick, so I didn’t have to participate.

I have witnessed police raids on civilians’ homes at night, I have seen police officers dragging a woman out of her home in the middle of the night… In prisons, you hear the screams of tortured prisoners, of people being raped. What comes out in the media is only a fraction of the human rights violations in Saudi Arabia.

Alenezi says he has no police protection in the UK. He has applied for asylum in the UK, the United States and Canada, which he hopes will help bring him a sense of safety.

The FRANCE 24 Observers team was able to confirm with the London police that a complaint had been filed regarding the threats toward Alenezi. An investigation was still ongoing as of March 31. 

We also reached out to the Saudi embassy in the UK which did not respond to our requests.

Who is behind the threatening account?

The FRANCE 24 Observers team looked into the Twitter account that launched this manhunt, which also tweets about other Saudi dissidents living abroad. 

The account was created in December 2021, but has no record of any activity before December 24, 2022. The account has not used any other username since it was created, according to our research.

When it first began, the account mainly posted about local and international football, but later deleted many of these tweets. 

In his bio, “Fahad Bin Sattam” said he was interested in “Saudi passion and identity” and listed an email address as a way to contact him about “any information on the Saudi opposition”. Followed by more than 34,000 subscribers, the account followed 713 people, mostly opponents of the Saudi regime, political asylum seekers and Arabic-speaking journalists.

A ‘digital army’ indirectly run by the regime

Abdullah Alaoudh is the Saudi head of the Washington DC-based NGO The Freedom Initiative. He lobbies the US Congress for the protection of Saudi dissidents abroad and raises awareness of the risks faced by Saudi political refugees.

Alaoudh posted about Alenezi’s case, prompting a number of replies from accounts mocking his outrage. One reply even included an edited photo depicting the Saudi crown prince with his foot on the heads of both men and the words, “Crush their faces into the ground. Slit their necks with your cleaver”.

For Alaoudh, these kind of threats against the exiled police officer are all part of a Saudi strategy that puts online pressure on those the regime designates as opponents. In 2018, a New York Times investigation revealed the extent of the regime’s efforts to silence its critics, using troll factories and spies working at Twitter.

The phenomenon of “digital armies” serving oppressive regimes is not new, but Mohammad bin Salman is using this tactic to occupy all the space for expression of his fellow citizens. The internet was a kind of informal Saudi parliament that we never had, and MBS is seeking to invade this space of virtual freedom. 

Digital armies are used to promote the regime, terrorise and harass opponents, and play on the social networking algorithm to change the narratives in Saudi Arabia. They appear to have bots that detect keywords, such as the initials “MBS” or “Vision 2030” [Editor’s note: a global project launched by the kingdom to expand Saudi investments abroad].

These “cyber warriors” typically target Saudi dissidents like me living abroad. As a test, I tweeted a few Qur’anic verses that had no  political overtones, but I was still inundated with hateful comments. The aim of these attacks is to provoke the victim and sully their image with their Saudi audience.

For example, these accounts will flood critical tweets with pro-regime hashtags or tweets glorifying the crown prince.

This “Fahad Bin Sattam” openly says “hunt down all traitors”. This is transcontinental oppression. We have reported several troll accounts en masse to Twitter, with no meaningful response. 

We have also officially reported these incidents of harassment to authorities in Canada, the US and the UK, where most Saudi refugees and asylum seekers are located. These countries do not want to be the scene of extrajudicial exactions.



Source link

#Bring #frightening #Twitter #hunt #Saudi #dissident #exile

NPR bids farewell to Twitter, but not without flushing their credibility down the toilet some more

Last week, Twitter slapped a “state-affiliated media” label (and later a “government-funded media” label) on NPR’s Twitter page, and it was perfect. Not just because it was accurate, but also because it pissed off NPR. And we’re always here for that.

Well, fast-forward to today, and NPR is so pissed off that they’ve decided to take their ball and go home. Or at least leave Twitter:

More from NPR:

Twitter then revised its label on NPR’s account to “government-funded media.” The news organization says that is inaccurate and misleading, given that NPR is a private, nonprofit company with editorial independence. It receives less than 1 percent of its $300 million annual budget from the federally funded Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

Yet by going silent on Twitter, NPR’s chief executive says the network is protecting its credibility and its ability to produce journalism without “a shadow of negativity.”

Even if Twitter were to drop the designation altogether, Lansing says the network will not immediately return to the platform.

“At this point I have lost my faith in the decision-making at Twitter,” he says. “I would need some time to understand whether Twitter can be trusted again.” Lansing says individual NPR journalists and staffers can decide for themselves whether to continue using Twitter.

In an email to staff explaining the decision, Lansing wrote, “It would be a disservice to the serious work you all do here to continue to share it on a platform that is associating the federal charter for public media with an abandoning of editorial independence or standards.”

NPR has editorial independence or standards? Since when?

Well, NPR is not editorially independent, so … we’re not seeing the issue here.

Truth hurts, NPR.

If NPR doesn’t want to be labeled as government-funded media, then they can just stop accepting government (i.e. taxpayer) funding. Seems pretty simple.

Or, you know, they could just keep lying about who they are:

That first sentence in NPR’s tweet contains multiple lies. “Consequential”? Nope, not really. “Independent”? Not even remotely. “In service to the public”? Puh-leeeze.

It doesn’t. Which just goes to show you how weak — or, rather, nonexistent — NPR’s credibility actually is.

As does this:

NPR is leaving Twitter but totally fine with the CCP, which just so happens to be a huge fan of … state-affiliated media. How ‘about that?

 

Absolutely insane, and also absolutely shameful:

Twitter doesn’t deserve the privilege of being a home for NPR’s credibility, but TikTok does? Yeah, we’re done here.

And conveniently, NPR is not intellectually honest. Not about journalism, and not about themselves.

***

Related:

NPR CEO’s statement on Twitter ‘state-affiliated media’ label only further solidifies NPR’s hackery

NPR TV critic says Chief Twit Elon Musk could have just spent five minutes listening to their content

Looks like NPR’s getting passive-aggressive after Twitter labeled them ‘state-affiliated media’

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!



Source link

#NPR #bids #farewell #Twitter #flushing #credibility #toilet

Matt Taibbi’s #TwitterFiles Part 19 takes deep, disturbing look at ‘The Great Covid-19 Lie Machine’

Earlier this month, Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz accused independent journalist Matt Taibbi of profiting off the “Twitter Files.”

Taibbi and journalists like Michael Shellenberger and Bari Weiss have been instrumental in bringing government and media corruption to light through their work on the “Twitter Files,” despite the Democratic Party and liberal media’s coordinated campaigns to kneecap and smear them. So we’re pleased to see that Taibbi hasn’t let the likes of Debbie Wasserman Schultz deter him from lifting heavy boulders and exposing corruption.

And that brings us to the “Twitter Files,” part 19. Taibbi dropped it today, and this particular thread focuses on “The Great Covid-19 Lie Machine, Stanford, the Virality Project, and the Censorship of ‘True Stories.’”

Get comfortable — but not too comfortable. You’re in for quite a ride:

There’s been enough corruption to fill 19 of these things! And we expect that there’s still a lot more where all that came from.

So stay tuned.

***

Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!



Source link

#Matt #Taibbis #TwitterFiles #Part #takes #deep #disturbing #Great #Covid19 #Lie #Machine