SBF’s Trial: BlockFi’s CEO Uncovers Billion-Dollar Loss

BlockFi’s CEO Zac Prince testified today
(Friday) in the ongoing case against Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF),
highlighting a billion-dollar loss incurred by his crypto lending firm in
connection with Alameda Research and FTX.

According to a report by Coindesk, BlockFi’s
involvement with Alameda Research began between 2020 and 2021. Prince mentioned
the existence of loan agreements between the two companies. Subsequently,
BlockFi had extended up to USD $1 billion to Alameda as of May 2022.

BlockFi’s troubles began when it experienced
significant losses due to the collapse of the Terra Luna crypto ecosystem. To
recover these losses, the lending firm initiated a process to recover its
loans from Alameda. Surprisingly, the jury was informed that Alameda Research
repaid all the borrowed funds, leading to BlockFi offering new loans worth USD $850
million to the company.

Besides its relationship with Alameda Research, BlockFi was a
customer of FTX. It allegedly held the collateral provided by Alameda Research
on FTX and managed customer funds amounting to around USD $350 million on the
exchange . BlockFi found itself in a tough financial situation, ultimately
losing “a little over a billion dollars” due to its ties with Alameda
and FTX. This loss forced BlockFi to declare bankruptcy.

Assistant US Attorney Nicholas Roos asked Prince to
explain why BlockFi filed for bankruptcy . Prince clarified that the financial
impairment of its funds on FTX and loans to Alameda prompted the decision,
though bankruptcy might have still been a possibility later.

Alameda’s Downfall and Ongoing
Controversies

However, the apparently strong partnership between
BlockFi and Alameda Research worsened when the hedge fund collapsed in November
2022. Despite additional collateral in the form of FTT, Robinhood shares, and
Grayscale trust shares, a significant sum remained outstanding, eventually
contributing to BlockFi’s billion-dollar loss.

In July, BlockFi faced heightened scrutiny after
creditors alleged that Prince was aware of FTX’s unstable financial condition
before its collapse. According to the Committee of Unsecured Creditors in a
court filing submitted in May, as cited by Decrypt, BlockFi was aware of
Alameda Research’s overexposure to FTT as early as August 2021. Despite these
concerns, Prince allegedly dismissed the risks, allowing Alameda
Research to receive loans primarily collateralized by
the FTT token.

BlockFi’s CEO Zac Prince testified today
(Friday) in the ongoing case against Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF),
highlighting a billion-dollar loss incurred by his crypto lending firm in
connection with Alameda Research and FTX.

According to a report by Coindesk, BlockFi’s
involvement with Alameda Research began between 2020 and 2021. Prince mentioned
the existence of loan agreements between the two companies. Subsequently,
BlockFi had extended up to USD $1 billion to Alameda as of May 2022.

BlockFi’s troubles began when it experienced
significant losses due to the collapse of the Terra Luna crypto ecosystem. To
recover these losses, the lending firm initiated a process to recover its
loans from Alameda. Surprisingly, the jury was informed that Alameda Research
repaid all the borrowed funds, leading to BlockFi offering new loans worth USD $850
million to the company.

Besides its relationship with Alameda Research, BlockFi was a
customer of FTX. It allegedly held the collateral provided by Alameda Research
on FTX and managed customer funds amounting to around USD $350 million on the
exchange . BlockFi found itself in a tough financial situation, ultimately
losing “a little over a billion dollars” due to its ties with Alameda
and FTX. This loss forced BlockFi to declare bankruptcy.

Assistant US Attorney Nicholas Roos asked Prince to
explain why BlockFi filed for bankruptcy . Prince clarified that the financial
impairment of its funds on FTX and loans to Alameda prompted the decision,
though bankruptcy might have still been a possibility later.

Alameda’s Downfall and Ongoing
Controversies

However, the apparently strong partnership between
BlockFi and Alameda Research worsened when the hedge fund collapsed in November
2022. Despite additional collateral in the form of FTT, Robinhood shares, and
Grayscale trust shares, a significant sum remained outstanding, eventually
contributing to BlockFi’s billion-dollar loss.

In July, BlockFi faced heightened scrutiny after
creditors alleged that Prince was aware of FTX’s unstable financial condition
before its collapse. According to the Committee of Unsecured Creditors in a
court filing submitted in May, as cited by Decrypt, BlockFi was aware of
Alameda Research’s overexposure to FTT as early as August 2021. Despite these
concerns, Prince allegedly dismissed the risks, allowing Alameda
Research to receive loans primarily collateralized by
the FTT token.

Source link

#SBFs #Trial #BlockFis #CEO #Uncovers #BillionDollar #Loss

Sam Bankman-Fried’s Day in Court: What Happened at FTX?

On the second day of Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial, the US
Department of Justice (DOJ) claimed that his crypto business had problems from
the beginning. The Assistant US Attorney Nathan Rehn described him as someone
who deceived customers and used their money for his own gain, including wealth
and political influence, as reported by Coindesk.

According to Rehn, Bankman-Fried diverted customers’ funds to
a “smaller and secretive” company called Alameda Research, using them
for personal luxuries and political donations. The prosecution alleges that
Bankman-Fried took over $10 billion from FTX to settle Alameda Research’s debts
and attempted to cover up his actions by creating false financial statements.

Rehn argues that Bankman-Fried directed customers to deposit
their funds into accounts controlled by Alameda and allowed the firm to withdraw
deposits. When Alameda’s cryptocurrency investments suffered losses in May and
June of the previous year, Bankman-Fried allegedly took even more money from
FTX. The prosecution argues that this plan fell apart in November 2022 when a
confidential financial document from Alameda was made public.

On the flip side, Bankman-Fried’s defense team argued that
their client acted in good faith, overwhelmed by the rapid growth of his
businesses. According to a report by Reuters, Mark Cohen, the lead defense
lawyer, stressed that Bankman-Fried never intended to defraud anyone and
portrayed him as a hardworking entrepreneur.

In addition, Cohen defended Bankman-Fried’s involvement in
both FTX and Alameda Research, stating that it was “totally normal”
for a CEO to remain connected to the activities of related companies. He
emphasized that Bankman-Fried needed liquidity for FTX, and Alameda Research
played a vital role as a market maker.

Sam Bankman-Fried’s Defense

However, Cohen admitted that FTX did lend money to Alameda
Research. He argues that Bankman-Fried thought these loans were legal and were
backed by collateral. According to Cohen, there was no theft involved, and
Bankman-Fried didn’t plan to defraud anyone. Instead, Cohen suggests that
during FTX’s fast growth, certain aspects of risk management might have been
overlooked.

The trial promises to be a battle of testimony, with the prosecution
planning to present documents, investor files, financial statements, and even
deleted tweets by Bankman-Fried. Meanwhile, the defense criticized the
government’s key witnesses, alleging they were testifying due to cooperation
agreements and may be biased.

The trial is expected to feature testimony from former members of Bankman-Fried’s inner circle, including Caroline Ellison and former
FTX’s executives Nishad Singh and Gary Wang, who have pleaded guilty and agreed
to cooperate with the prosecution.

On the second day of Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial, the US
Department of Justice (DOJ) claimed that his crypto business had problems from
the beginning. The Assistant US Attorney Nathan Rehn described him as someone
who deceived customers and used their money for his own gain, including wealth
and political influence, as reported by Coindesk.

According to Rehn, Bankman-Fried diverted customers’ funds to
a “smaller and secretive” company called Alameda Research, using them
for personal luxuries and political donations. The prosecution alleges that
Bankman-Fried took over $10 billion from FTX to settle Alameda Research’s debts
and attempted to cover up his actions by creating false financial statements.

Rehn argues that Bankman-Fried directed customers to deposit
their funds into accounts controlled by Alameda and allowed the firm to withdraw
deposits. When Alameda’s cryptocurrency investments suffered losses in May and
June of the previous year, Bankman-Fried allegedly took even more money from
FTX. The prosecution argues that this plan fell apart in November 2022 when a
confidential financial document from Alameda was made public.

On the flip side, Bankman-Fried’s defense team argued that
their client acted in good faith, overwhelmed by the rapid growth of his
businesses. According to a report by Reuters, Mark Cohen, the lead defense
lawyer, stressed that Bankman-Fried never intended to defraud anyone and
portrayed him as a hardworking entrepreneur.

In addition, Cohen defended Bankman-Fried’s involvement in
both FTX and Alameda Research, stating that it was “totally normal”
for a CEO to remain connected to the activities of related companies. He
emphasized that Bankman-Fried needed liquidity for FTX, and Alameda Research
played a vital role as a market maker.

Sam Bankman-Fried’s Defense

However, Cohen admitted that FTX did lend money to Alameda
Research. He argues that Bankman-Fried thought these loans were legal and were
backed by collateral. According to Cohen, there was no theft involved, and
Bankman-Fried didn’t plan to defraud anyone. Instead, Cohen suggests that
during FTX’s fast growth, certain aspects of risk management might have been
overlooked.

The trial promises to be a battle of testimony, with the prosecution
planning to present documents, investor files, financial statements, and even
deleted tweets by Bankman-Fried. Meanwhile, the defense criticized the
government’s key witnesses, alleging they were testifying due to cooperation
agreements and may be biased.

The trial is expected to feature testimony from former members of Bankman-Fried’s inner circle, including Caroline Ellison and former
FTX’s executives Nishad Singh and Gary Wang, who have pleaded guilty and agreed
to cooperate with the prosecution.

Source link

#Sam #BankmanFrieds #Day #Court #Happened #FTX

Checks & Imbalances: Trump’s Tower Of Lies, Pompeo’s Book Sales

Today we look at two Republicans who have announced they are running for president, as well as a third who is expected to do the same.

This is the web edition of the free Checks & Imbalances newsletter, sent to inboxes on Fridays. You can subscribe here. Please support this work, if you can, by subscribing to Forbes.


Donald Trump Has Been Lying About Trump Tower For Decades

“As the former president tries to fend off authorities, new revelations about Trump Tower suggest that the building is—and always was—something of a fraud,” reports Dan Alexander.

Our latest look at Trump Tower uncovered three new revelations:

– Property records show that Trump has been lying about the financial performance of the building since it first opened in 1983.

– Tax and lending documents indicate that Trump lied about the square footage of the office and retail space at the base of the property (not to be confused with his lying about size of the penthouse atop the building, which Forbes previously exposed).

– Portions of a 2015 audio recording, released here for the first time, prove that Trump was personally involved in the efforts to lie about the value of Trump Tower’s commercial space.

Watch: Senior editor Dan Alexander joins Brittany Lewis to discuss this story.


Tip Me

Any tips or suggestions? Email me at [email protected], call/SMS/Signal 202.804.2744, use Forbes’ SecureDrop or send us a letter. Follow me on Mastodon at @[email protected]. Thanks!


Mike Pompeo’s PAC Spent $42,000 On Books The Day His Memoir Was Published. It Became A Bestseller.

Mike Pompeo’s political action committee shelled out $42,000 on books the day his memoir hit bookshelves, according to a filing submitted to the Federal Election Commission on Monday.

“Never Give An Inch: Fighting for the America I Love” came out on Jan. 24. That same day, Champion American Values, a PAC that Pompeo chairs, paid Bulkbooks.com $42,000 for “mementos—books,” according to the filing.

Pompeo’s memoir debuted at No. 3 on the New York Times best-seller list for hardcover nonfiction. Three weeks later, it remains in the rankings at No. 10. The Times notes that retailers reported bulk orders of “Never Give An Inch.”

Pompeo is not a candidate for federal office, so he is allowed to personally profit when his PAC buys his book with donors’ funds, according to Brett Kappel, an attorney specializing in campaign finance at Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg.

Spokespeople for Champion American Values did not immediately respond to inquiries.

In addition to paying back an advance or earning royalties, politicians can benefit in other ways when their political committees buy their books. Publishers might be more likely to strike deals with politicians in the first place, knowing they have donor funds they can tap into for a bulk purchase. And purchases from retailers, even in bulk, can help a book reach the best-seller list, a marketing coup.

Pompeo’s PAC used the Times’ ranking to emphasize his book’s appeal. “Even the New York Times admits that my new book is a must-read!,” Pompeo says in a $400 Facebook ad campaign that started on Feb. 14. The Times did not review Pompeo’s book, suggesting that Pompeo was referring to its position on the best-seller list.

Other politicians have used their PAC funds to buy their own memoirs. In November, former Vice President Mike Pence’s Great America Committee spent $91,000 on his book at a New York City retailer. Unlike Pompeo though, when Pence’s memoir hit the best-seller list, the Times did not indicate any bulk orders.


Bankman-Fried Hit With Four New Criminal Charges Alleging Illegal Political Donations And Bank Fraud

“Former billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of befallen crypto exchange FTX, has been charged with four new criminal counts including allegations of illegal political donations and bank fraud, an indictment unsealed in Manhattan federal court revealed on Thursday—tacking on to the eight charges already facing the former wunderkind as he gears up for trial later this year,” reports Jonathan Ponciano.

In a superseding indictment unveiled Thursday, prosecutors allege Bankman-Fried used billions of dollars in customer funds to fund speculative venture investments and try to purchase influence over cryptocurrency regulation in Washington, D.C. by steering tens of millions of dollars of illegal campaign contributions to both Democrats and Republicans.

The new counts include conspiracy to commit wire fraud, operate an unlicensed money transmitter, make unlawful political contributions and defraud the Federal Election Commission.


Republican Presidential Candidate Vivek Ramaswamy Sells $32 Million Of Biotech Firm’s Stock

“On Wednesday GOP presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy sold 4 million shares in biotech firm Roivant Sciences at a price of $7.95 per share for a total of $32 million, netting him an estimated $24.2 million in after-tax proceeds,” reports John Hyatt.

The stock sale, reported in a regulatory filing, came one day after Ramaswamy announced his longshot bid for the Republican presidential candidacy with an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal and an appearance on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show…

Ramaswamy’s stock sale proceeds may go towards funding his presidential campaign. (He could not be reached for comment as of press time.) In recent days the biotech entrepreneur has been barnstorming across New Hampshire speaking about climate change, China and other campaign themes.

Not that Ramaswamy wants to make a habit of self funding. The filing reporting his Roivant stock sale came with a footnote that says, “The reporting person does not expect to sell additional shares of the Issuer [Roivant] for the foreseeable future.”


Tracking Trump

“Two pregnant women, a heart attack sufferer and a woman who needed airlifting to a hospital after a stroke were amongst hundreds victims of an alleged $4 million fraud perpetrated by a Christian ministry offering an Obamacare alternative, according to the FBI,” reports Thomas Brewster.

Members of the Medical Cost Sharing (MCS) ministry had been promised their medical bills would be covered in return for a monthly contribution. Those membership fees were to be “shared” with a network of “like-minded” Christians, in what appeared to be a legitimate faith-based nonprofit, effectively crowdfunding insurance and charitably disbursing money when claimants required aid. But clients claimed they were denied coverage for reasons they couldn’t grasp and left with thousands in unpaid medical bills, according to an FBI search warrant. The feds claim it was part of a fraud, one that saw the business owners—Missouri-based Craig Reynolds and James McGinnis—pocket $4 million of $7.5 million in membership payments, of which only $250,000 (3.2%) went on medical expenses. The feds say the organization has become even stingier in recent years, distributing no money whatsoever to members since 2021…

Meanwhile, according to investigators, Reynolds and McGinnis have enjoyed the fruits of their illicit labor, taking money out of MCS accounts to the point where the nonprofit didn’t have enough funds to cover claimants, the DOJ said in a complaint. Feds claimed the membership fees were used, among other things, to pay for a holiday to Mexico, various vehicles and a $300 gift to a Donald Trump political action committee.

*****

“Take a wild guess as to who’s providing ‘Trump Water’ to residents of East Palestine, Ohio. And take a wild guess as to who’s told everyone about it. Well, you probably don’t need 45 guesses. The answer to both of these questions was the 45th U.S. President and current Mar-a-Lago resident Donald Trump,” reports Bruce Y. Lee.

*****

Kari Lake, an Arizona Republican who lost her gubernatorial run, returned to Mar-a-Lago last week, according to an Instagram post.

*****

Steve Wynn, a casino mogul who resigned from his company after accusations of sexual misconduct (he denied the allegations), appeared at a second Trump property in the past month.

*****

Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares will headline the 6th Annual Loudoun Conservative Gala on April 29 at Trump’s Virginia golf club. Tickets are $150.

*****

The Hispanic Police Officers Association of Dade County commemorated President’s Day by sharing a photograph of the group’s president at Trump’s Miami resort.

*****

Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli performed at Mar-a-Lago last weekend during the wedding reception of major Republican donor Adam Kidan. Trump attended the event.


Across Forbes


In Closing

It’s all right, it’s okay

And you may look the other way

We can try to understand

The New York Times’ effect on man

— Bee Gees, “Stayin’ Alive”



Source link

#Checks #Imbalances #Trumps #Tower #Lies #Pompeos #Book #Sales

These Crypto Founders And Bitcoin Moguls Lost $116 Billion In 2022

The embattled cryptocurrency industry and its wealthy pioneers face a moment of reckoning after the collapse of crypto exchange FTX and hedge fund Alameda Research

In January 2022, Sam Bankman-Fried was riding high. His Bahamas-based FTX had just raised $400 million from prominent venture capitalists at a $32 billion valuation. A few weeks later, when Forbes published its annual World’s Billionaires list, SBF, as he’s known, was crypto’s second-wealthiest person, worth $24 billion.

Now, Bankman-Fried is likely broke, and awaiting trial. Before he was arrested in the Bahamas, SBF told several media outlets his bank account was down to $100,000, and that he was “not sure” how he’ll pay his lawyers. Gary Wang, FTX’s other cofounder and the company’s former chief technology officer–who entered a plea deal with the Securities and Exchange Commission–has also seen his fortune, once estimated at $5.9 billion, wiped.

FTX’s demise was a fitting end to a year of wealth destruction in the cryptocurrency and blockchain sector. The post-pandemic economic shock, which triggered inflation and rising interest rates, sucked capital out of the speculative crypto ecosystem. Prominent firms imploded, from the $40 billion collapse in May of algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD, to the crypto hedge fund Three Arrows (which declared for bankruptcy in July), to the bankruptcies of interest-bearing lending businesses Voyager Digital, Celsius and BlockFi. Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency and an industry bellwether, is down 65% from its $69,000 peak in November 2021. Meanwhile some $2 trillion of market value has fled digital assets for safer pastures.

As a result, 17 of crypto’s wealthiest investors and founders have collectively lost an estimated $116 billion in personal wealth since March, according to Forbes’ estimates. Fifteen of them have lost more than half their fortune over the past nine months. Ten have lost their billionaire status altogether.

“We’re now at the breaking point in crypto where everyone will have to take a pause and say, ‘Okay, we’ve seen a ton of economic wealth destroyed in the last couple of months, we need to start taking this seriously,’” says Matt Cohen, founder of Ripple Ventures, a venture capital firm. “A lot of blockchain technologies and crypto companies built solutions for problems that didn’t need fixing, and I think we’re now going to have a hard reset.”

The man with the most to lose is Changpeng Zhao, CEO of Binance, crypto’s largest exchange, a sprawling global network of murky subsidiaries. CZ, as he’s known, has an estimated 70% stake in Binance, which Forbes’ values at $4.5 billion–down from $65 billion in March.

CZ helped set FTX’s demise in motion on November 6 when he tweeted that Binance would sell its remaining FTT, the native cryptocurrency of FTX. That triggered a run on FTX’s coffers as customers scrambled to withdraw their money, only to discover it was gone. FTX declared bankruptcy a few days later. Zhao prevailed over his rival, but now he must contend with the consequences. That could include the clawback in bankruptcy court of the over $2.1 billion that Binance made from selling its stake in FTX back to Bankman-Fried in the summer of 2021. (Zhao helped seed FTX in 2019.)

CZ also faces increased skepticism of centralized exchanges, particularly Binance, and ongoing investigations of him and his company by authorities in Europe and the United States over allegations of facilitating money laundering and other financial crimes. (Binance has denied wrongdoing.) In recent weeks, CZ has sought to reassure Binance users that their crypto deposits are fully backed, commissioning accounting firm Mazars to produce “proof of reserves” reports. These statements, which do not include liabilities, were widely criticized as insufficient for providing an incomplete snapshot of a company’s financial health. Mazars has since paused its work with crypto companies, adding to the uncertainty around Binance’s finances–and the exchange’s future.

“I don’t believe a business can persist, operating in this amorphous way, not governed by anyone or anywhere, especially when it’s run by a public individual,” says Lisa Ellis, an equity analyst at MoffettNathanson, a division of SVB Securities. Binance’s “dodgy operating model” would be a “non-starter for many investors, public or private,” adds Ellis.

CZ stated in a webinar on December 23 that Binance has zero liabilities: “We are quite a unique organization, we don’t have loans from any other organizations,” he said. “We will prove all the FUD [fear, uncertainty and doubt] is wrong.” A spokesperson for Binance said that Forbes’ estimate of CZ’s net worth “not an important metric for CZ. What’s more important is creating meaningful use cases for crypto.”

Barry Silbert, head of crypto conglomerate Digital Currency Group, is at the heart of crypto’s market contagion. One of DCG’s key assets, crypto lending unit Genesis Global Capital, owes creditors at least $1.8 billion, according to a source familiar with the matter (and as Reuters first reported). Additionally, DCG is saddled with debt. It assumed a $1.1 billion liability from Genesis, which stemmed from a bad loan Genesis had made to the now-bankrupt Three Arrows hedge fund. Separately, DCG owes Genesis another $575 million, which is due in May. DCG also owes $350 million to investment firm Elridge if Genesis goes under, the Financial Times reported.

To stay afloat, Silbert will likely have to raise outside capital or dismantle his DCG crypto empire, which includes some 200 investments in crypto firms and tokens, including crypto news site CoinDesk, bitcoin mining firm Foundry and Grayscale Investments, an asset management business that offers shares in a publicly traded Bitcoin trust. Forbes estimates the value of DCG’s outstanding liabilities are greater than the fair market value of its assets in the current market environment; DCG may also struggle to offload illiquid bets. For these reasons, Forbes estimates the current value of Silbert’s 40% stake in DCG to be approximately $0. Silbert’s personal investments could not be determined. A spokesperson for DCG declined to comment.

“They had a solvency issue at Genesis, which transformed into a liquidity issue. But those losses don’t disappear,” says Ram Ahluwalia, CEO of crypto-focused Lumida Wealth Management, who points out that Genesis creditors will have claims on DCG assets even if Genesis declares bankruptcy. “If DCG doesn’t raise fresh equity capital it will be perceived as a zombie business.”

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, the bitcoin billionaires immortalized in The Social Network for their role in Facebook’s founding, are also caught in Silbert’s lending web. Gemini, the twins’ privately held crypto exchange, offered their users returns as high as 8% during the bull market through their Gemini Earn product, which outsourced the loanmaking to Genesis; now Gemini customers are owed some $900 million by Genesis. On November 16, Genesis suspended withdrawals, leaving customers outraged. Gemini Dollar, the exchange’s stablecoin and a key component of Gemini Earn’s lending program, has experienced large outflows. The Winklevii have remained quiet, apart from sparsely worded Twitter updates about Gemini forming a creditor committee.

For Brian Armstrong, who is the CEO of publicly traded exchange Coinbase, FTX’s collapse presented an opportunity to strike. On November 8, in the chaotic hours after Binance announced its tentative takeover of FTX, Armstrong trumpeted his vision for crypto while dissing Binance’s Zhao. “Coinbase and Binance are following different approaches. We’re trying to follow a regulated, trusted approach,” Armstrong said on the Bankless podcast. “To look at it intellectually honestly, we’re choosing to follow the rules. It’s a more difficult path and sometimes your hands are tied, but I think that’s the right long-term strategy.” In a 13-tweet thread that same day, Armstrong reiterated those themes.

Investors don’t seem to care. Coinbase’s stock is down 64% since August and more than 95% from its $100 billion IPO in April 2021, wiping out much of Armstrong’s fortune.

Meanwhile, Coinbase’s other cofounder, Fred Ehrsam, got burned by Bankman-Fried. His crypto venture firm Paradigm invested $278 million in FTX equity. Ehrsam has not issued any public statements about the investment. Matt Huang, Ehrsam’s partner at Paradigm, said on Twitter: “We feel deep regret for having invested in a founder and company who ultimately did not align with crypto’s values and who have done enormous damage to the ecosystem,” adding that Paradigm’s equity investment in FTX “constituted a small part of our total assets” and that Paradigm had never entrusted FTX to hold any of its digital asset investments.

Private crypto firms that raised capital in 2021 or earlier this year at high valuations are being traded at significant markdowns on secondary markets and in over-the-counter deals, says Matt Cohen of Ripple Ventures, who expects to see larger markdowns for the fourth quarter as companies prepare year-end investor reports. “Q4 audit season is going to be the time when the rubber meets the road on what funds are going to be marked down properly,” he says.

For example, shares of NFT exchange OpenSea are trading at a 75% discount since January, when OpenSea hit a $13.3 billion valuation, according to data from private market data platforms ApeVue and Caplight. Daily trading volumes on OpenSea’s NFT exchange have been under $10 million in the last month, compared to over $200 million back in January, according to crypto site DappRadar. OpenSea’s 30-something cofounders, Devin Finzer and Alex Atallahh, are no longer billionaires.

Nikil Viswanathan and Joe Lau, the founders of Alchemy, a crypto software firm that powers other Web3 ventures, have also departed the three-comma club, based on estimated markdowns of their stakes in Alchemy, which last raised outside capital in February at a $10.2 billion valuation. According to Viswanathan, FTX’s collapse “hurts the consumer perception of the [crypto] space. We’ve seen this play out in the Lehman Brothers and Bernie Madoff collapses in 2008 — it takes time to recover.” Alchemy, however, has continued growing throughout the bear market, says Viswanathan. “The difference is in Web3 we’ve seen developer activity accelerate during even the most tumultuous times, which points to an incredibly strong, mission-driven community of builders.”

Jed McCaleb, cofounder of crypto firm Ripple, is believed to be the only person who made their fortune in crypto to have retained most of his fortune through the downturn. But that’s because he sold out almost entirely before the crash. McCaleb offloaded some $2.5 billion worth of XRP, Ripple’s native token, between December 2020 and July 2022, fulfilling the separation agreement he signed with Ripple’s other founders back in 2013. Today, XRP trades around $0.40 per coin, down around 50% from earlier this year, when McCaleb was dumping millions of dollars’ worth of XRP tokens each week.

Chris Larsen, Ripple’s other founder and its chairman, has lost over $2 billion this year, due to XRP’s declining price and Forbes’ estimated discount on Ripple’s equity valuation. Ripple, which last raised capital in 2019 at a $10 billion valuation, bought back shares from an investor last year at an inflated $15 billion valuation after that investor had sued Ripple in connection with a Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit filed against Ripple in December 2020; that case is still working its way through courts.

Tim Draper, a venture capitalist who holds around 30,000 bitcoins, dropped from the billionaire ranks earlier this year, when Bitcoin hit $33,000. As ever though, Draper remains optimistic about bitcoin’s future, even though his oft-repeated $250,000 price target looks more fanciful by the day. “I suspect that this is the beginning of the end of the centralized tokens,” Draper tells Forbes. “If a token is centralized, you’re at the mercy of the person who controls the currency. And that was definitely the case with FTX.”



Source link

#Crypto #Founders #Bitcoin #Moguls #Lost #Billion