‘Where’s AOC’ trends as the Biden Administration puts kids in cages

Senator Ron Johnson is one of the people informing us that there are, in fact, kids in cages in America again:

So that led to the obvious question:

Hilariously, ‘Where’s AOC,’ is trending nationally because people are calling Alexandria Occasional-Cortex Ocasio-Cortez out. Here are some of the best examples:

A callback to when she pretended to be handcuffed.

We don’t think that is the real Alex Jones, but without reliable blue-check verification, who can know?

Of course, one liberal complained that somehow this was bullying:

No, criticizing a public figure is not bullying. It’s free speech.

Or maybe it is those evil Russians!

О черт, он к нам!!!

(We hope google translate worked for that joke. We wanted to say “oh crap, he’s onto us!!!” Our apologies to any Russian speakers if we said anything truly rude.)

Another Tweeter thought he nailed conservatives on this:

Actually, pointing out hypocrisy is not taking a stance on the substantive issue, but thanks for playing.

Naturally, the dragging extended into broader issues of hypocrisy than just AOC’s:

He’s not wrong.

Indeed, this person has the receipts:

Truly, an excellent thread. Well done!

The cold reality is that as long as minors are sent across the border illegally, accompanied or not, we will need to detain them. We frankly detain minors all the time, including citizens. Juvenile courts are filled with minors who commit crimes and, yes, they are regularly sent to prison. They are often held in jail awaiting trial for their alleged crimes. Typically, these involve special units for children, but we still confine them. It was nothing more than demagoguery for Democrats to pretend this was somehow wrong or even unusual, which is why they are doing it again, now that they are in charge, again. Sometimes children have to be detained. Every sane person wishes it was unnecessary, but every rational person knows that sometimes it has to be done. It is as simple as that.

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!



Source link

#Wheres #AOC #trends #Biden #Administration #puts #kids #cages

Dr. Fauci admits masks didn’t actually do very much good

As we noted earlier today, Dr. Anthony Fauci sat down for an interview with the New York Times and denied any responsibility for the COVID lockdowns. We also covered Alyssa Farah Griffin’s attempt to back him up. That attempt to rewrite history is galling enough. However, Ian Miles Cheong found something else objectionable in that interview:

Now he says it.

Now he says it after people were censored on social media for questioning his claim that masks were some kind of miracle preventative.

Now he says it after lip-reading deaf people had their lives ruined.

Yes, she won a court case but only after losing her job.

Now he says they didn’t work very well after Shannon Heroux was reduced to tears:

Now he says it after this child abuse occurred:

Now he says it after this parent told us how it harmed her children’s health:

Now he tells us.

And he knew masks weren’t important. His behavior told you that he knew:

They all knew:

They all knew, but they imposed these mandates anyway. We are not saying no one benefits from masking. Some people are more vulnerable to COVID than others. But there was never proof that the benefit of a mask mandate outweighed the harms. We should have defaulted to freedom and individual choice.

Listen to these children when they are told they were no longer going to be forced to wear a mask. Listen to their joy:

Their joy is an indictment on every politician who forced them to wear masks—especially if they couldn’t live under the rules they imposed on us.

Naturally, there were some reactions:

That would be sarcasm set to 11.

It’s okay to laugh, folks. But also don’t ever forget the lessons we learned.



Source link

#Fauci #admits #masks #didnt #good

It’s the hypocrisy, stupid! Massive list of leftist love for Rand Paul’s neighbor – with receipts


The brutal attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, has created a firestorm of political finger pointing, but it’s hard to miss the hypocrisy of the Left when it comes to violent attacks against politicians or their families.

We’ve reported the emerging, and strange, and even stranger, details of the attack as the story develops. Needless to say, the story is a hot mess, and the need for the Left to blame Republicans has made it even messier.

The calls for Republicans to ‘condemn’ the attack surfaced as reliably as Joe Biden getting lost on stage. This is right out of the leftist playbook. It goes without saying that the assault on Paul Pelosi is vile and despicable. Asking someone to ‘condemn’ the attack really means ‘you’re responsible for this violence, so you need to denounce your guy’. Don’t play that game.

Time will tell if Paul Pelosi’s attacker was motivated by any particular political ideology. Michael Shellenberger has an excellent writeup on what may turn out to be the best explanation for this: the guy is a drug-addled nutcase (our words, not Shellenberger’s).

What most of us couldn’t help notice was the hypocrisy of the Left. Just last month a teenager was murdered by a man who ran him over, thinking he was a ‘Republican extremist’. Crickets from the Left.

The most obvious case of left wing hypocrisy, however, is the ongoing infatuation by some on the Left with Rand Paul’s neighbor. It’s not a matter of condemning the attack on Rand Paul for these people. They’ve condoned, defended, mocked, praised, and celebrated the attack, and they continue to do so.

We’ll spare you all the tweets this guy made about Rand Paul’s neighbor.

Tony’s concerned about violence now.

They love the guy who brutally assaulted a senator.

Let us know, Adam, when McCarthy says someone ‘went all Paul Pelosi’s attacker’ on someone else.

Keith is the poster child for frothing spittle-laced rants that might incite a fellow wacko. He identifies with Rand Paul’s neighbor.

Condolences are fascist now.

Tom excels at finding the bottom of the barrel and hanging out there.

Real nice, Tom.

Tom is now concerned about violence.

Welcome to the thread, morally bankrupt ‘Christian’ pastor.

Decent human beings don’t identify with people who assault senators.

You had to know Rex would make an appearance.

Now Rex is worried about jokes about violence?

Chip loves him some Rand Paul’s neighbor.

Chip also cares about violence when it happens to his side.

Nice reaction to the brutal attack on Rand Paul.

Oops.

Seriously? He LOVES him?

Yes, zero shame.

Not this lady. Rand Paul’s neighbor is her ‘bro’.

The hypocrisy is overwhelming.

Oh do you now, David?

Maybe Elon should read this entire thread.

Pronouns: (clown/Rand Paul’s Neighbor)

Stop encouraging violence, George.

Senator Paul called out this weasel for that (now deleted) tweet, after receiving a death threat in the form of a suspicious package.

It’s just Richard Marx mainstreaming political violence …

… which is really bad and stuff.

Many on the left have truly lionized Rand Paul’s neighbor because he brutally assaulted a politician they hate.

Rich sucks.

Jezebel loves some violent imagery …

… sometimes.

She would like to buy him a keg of beer for savagely beating a senator? What word could we use to describe someone who thinks this way? …

Vile. That’s a good word.

Bette Midler has made no secret of letting everyone know how much she admires Rand Paul’s attacker.

Bette might just as well have tackled Rand Paul herself.

Thinking about the injuries Rand Paul sustained gives this guy hope.

He’s also very concerned about increasing political violence.

That assault was justified, in their minds, because they hate Rand Paul.

Brian didn’t mind celebrating an *actual* attack against Rand Paul.

Remember this one?

‘Took one for the team for all of us’.

What if you’re the bad guy, Grant?

Molly decided to delete this gem within the past year (we’d love to know if it was recently).

Yes, Rand Paul’s criminal assailant should run in 2020. Good look, Molly.

You think?

Molly would want them to run for President, apparently.

This was exhausting. Hypocrites, all the way down.





Source link