Crypto Billionaire Cameron Winklevoss Ups Ante In Bankruptcy Dispute With Barry Silbert

The Winklevoss twins doubled down on fraud allegations against Digital Currency Group founder Barry Silbert and threatened further legal action to recover over $1 billion in customer funds.


So much for a peaceful holiday.

On July 3, bitcoin billionaire Cameron Winklevoss, twin brother of Tyler Winklevoss, published a scathing letter addressed to Digital Currency Group founder Barry Silbert in a bid to force the embattled mogul to settle with his creditors.

“You have never had any intention of doing the right thing and taking responsibility for the mess that you, your companies, and your employees created with your reckless and fraudulent behavior,” writes Winklevoss in the letter, which he shared on Twitter, and which reiterates accusations of accounting fraud he first leveled in January.

DCG and Silbert did not respond to requests for comment. In January, a spokesperson for the firm denied the allegations and described Winklevoss’s initial letter as a “desperate and unconstructive publicity stunt.”

Genesis Global Capital, the lending arm of Silbert’s digital assets conglomerate, filed for bankruptcy in January after making bad loans, including to FTX’s sister company Alameda Research, which shut down in November following fraud allegations against its founder Sam Bankman-Fried (which he denies).

Genesis owes more than $3.5 billion to its largest 50 creditors, including $766 million earmarked for customers of Gemini, a crypto exchange run by the Winklevoss twins, according to Genesis’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing from January. Gemini had previously partnered with Genesis on its Gemini Earn program, which lent out customers’ crypto to generate yield.

Winklevoss vowed in his letter to sue Silbert personally if DCG does not agree to Gemini’s proposed “Final Offer” for Silbert’s company to pay a near $1.5 billion settlement to Gemini Earn customers by the end of this week, as outlined in a second Tweet. (The higher dollar price tag appears to account for crypto prices skyrocketing between the original Chapter 11 filing and now). Winklevoss also pledged to file a turnover motion, which could force DCG to turn over its assets to a third party to distribute them to creditors.

DCG had announced an initial restructuring term sheet in February that would involve the Winklevoss brothers chipping in $100 million of their personal funds, but that deal fell apart: DCG says that some creditors “reneged and raised new demands.”

“My speculation is that DCG floated a term sheet out there, and in fact did not have the alignment out there [among creditors],” says Ram Ahluwalia, CEO of crypto firm Lumida, who is not involved in the dispute but has been closely following the situation.

The parties moved to mediation in May after DCG failed to make a scheduled $630 million loan payment to Genesis. Winklevoss now says in his public letter that the move was a ploy for Silbert to obtain “infinite forbearance” on the loan payment.

Complicating the matter further is that Genesis is also now being sued by the bankrupt crypto exchange FTX (founded by former billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried), which filed a lawsuit in May seeking to reclaim about $3.9 billion in cash and crypto assets from Genesis. Lawyers for FTX alleged that Genesis “was one of the main feeder of funds for FTX and instrumental to its fraudulent business model.” Genesis denies wrongdoing and is contesting the legal action.

“Since this proceeding is mainly between two entities which have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, ultimately the funds will be taken from one set of debtors to benefit another set of debtors,” Fatemeh Fannizadeh, chief of legal affairs and a board member at the Swarm Foundation, which is not involved in the litigation, previously told Forbes. “Which ones are more legitimate to be made whole is yet another question.”

Silbert’s 40% stake in DCG was once worth over $3 billion, after investors in the digital asset conglomerate sold $700 million of stock in a secondary sale at a $10 billion valuation in November 2021. Today Forbes estimates Silbert is worth around $450 million, thanks to an early bet on bitcoin. Luno, a crypto exchange owned by DCG, laid off about 35% of its employees earlier this year.

The Winklevoss twins, too, were also once worth over $4 billion each, per Forbes; Gemini was previously valued at $7 billion by outside investors. Today, each twin is worth an estimated $1.5 billion. Trading volumes on Gemini cratered after the Earn fiasco. In an apparent effort to reboot its business, Gemini recently announced it was seeking a crypto license in Dubai.

The Silbert-Winklevii relationship dates back to 2021, when Gemini launched its Gemini Earn program, an interest-bearing program for yield-hungry crypto investors. Serving as an agent, Gemini directed its Earn customer funds to Genesis, which lent out those assets to other investors, including Alameda Research, the hedge fund and sister company of FTX. In November last year, following FTX’s blowup, Genesis halted withdrawals by Gemini Earn customers, leaving 230,000 people without access to their crypto.

Winklevoss’s fraud allegations pertain to a $1.1 billion “promissory note” that DCG issued to Genesis last June, after one of its biggest borrowers, crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital, went bankrupt. Winklevoss alleged in January that the $1.1 billion note was “a complete gimmick that did nothing to improve Genesis’ immediate liquidity position or make its balance sheet solvent.” (Genesis has denied these allegations).

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued Genesis and Gemini in January, alleging that the two parties sold unregistered securities through the Gemini Earn program. The SEC lawsuit is one area where both Silbert and the Winklevii are in agreement, as both parties are moving to have the case dismissed, on the basis that Earn products were not investment securities.



Source link

#Crypto #Billionaire #Cameron #Winklevoss #Ups #Ante #Bankruptcy #Dispute #Barry #Silbert

Inflows into Crypto Products Highest since FTX Collapse

The average weekly inflows into digital asset-based investment products
reached $36.8 million in January, which is the highest since the collapse of the once-leading crypto exchange, FTX, in November last year. The new height comes
months after FTX’s bankruptcy led to a crypto withdrawal frenzy.

CryptoCompare, a UK-based crypto market data provider, disclosed these numbers on
Wednesday in its Digital Asset Management Review for January 2023. According to the data provider, the total assets under management (AUM)
of digital asset investment products also improved by 36.8% month-over-month in January,
reaching $19.7 billion. The firm noted the figure is the highest AUM on record since May 2022.

“The bullish sentiment was driven by liquidated short positions and a favorable macro environment, reflected in the most recent CPI announcement,
which saw Bitcoin’s price reach $23,000; its highest level since August 2022,”
CryptoCompare explained.

However, despite the improvement, the AUM still falls
“considerably” short of total assets under management posted in January last year.
This comes as a result of the downtrend experienced in the crypto and
traditional asset markets in 2022.

“In January 2023, average daily aggregate product volumes across all
digital asset investment products saw a decent recovery, rising 30.0% to
$72.5mn. Despite this, volumes are still 84.4% lower compared to January 2022
and 95.2% lower than the all-time high recorded in January 2021,” CryptoCompare
explained.

Watch the recent FMLS22 session on the crypto market structure.

According to data shared by CryptoCompare, Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust
(GBTC) continued to top the Bitcoin trust
market in January as its assets under management increased by 38.4%
to $14.5 billion month-over-month. GBTC is managed by Grayscale Investment, a digital asset manager and a subsidiary company of the Digital Currency Group (DCG).

Grayscale Investments’ bitcoin trust remains strong “despite the
uncertainty surrounding Genesis Trading,” CryptoCompare said. In mid-November, the crypto lender
Genesis Global Capital, which is owned by DCG, faced a ‘liquidity crunch’ and sought a $1 billion emergency loan. However, over two weeks ago two lending subsidiaries of the firm filed for bankruptcy protection before a Manhattan
court.

In addition, the crypto exchange Gemini is battling with Genesis over the payment of
a $900 million debt under the Gemini Earn programme. Moreover, three Gemini Earn
customers recently filed a class action arbitration request against Genesis for
allegedly failing to return Gemini Earn users’ assets. Compounding the situation, the US Securities and Exchange
Commission recently charged both Gemini and Genesis for
allegedly selling unregistered securities.

“Despite the growth in assets under management and trading volume, the
discount associated with Grayscale’s GBTC Trust has only slightly narrowed. The
situation remains delicate, as Grayscale faced challenges with the bankruptcy
announcement of its sister company Genesis due to exposure to FTX in January,
and the ongoing lawsuit against the SEC to convert its Bitcoin Trust into an
ETF,” CryptoCompare explained.

The average weekly inflows into digital asset-based investment products
reached $36.8 million in January, which is the highest since the collapse of the once-leading crypto exchange, FTX, in November last year. The new height comes
months after FTX’s bankruptcy led to a crypto withdrawal frenzy.

CryptoCompare, a UK-based crypto market data provider, disclosed these numbers on
Wednesday in its Digital Asset Management Review for January 2023. According to the data provider, the total assets under management (AUM)
of digital asset investment products also improved by 36.8% month-over-month in January,
reaching $19.7 billion. The firm noted the figure is the highest AUM on record since May 2022.

“The bullish sentiment was driven by liquidated short positions and a favorable macro environment, reflected in the most recent CPI announcement,
which saw Bitcoin’s price reach $23,000; its highest level since August 2022,”
CryptoCompare explained.

However, despite the improvement, the AUM still falls
“considerably” short of total assets under management posted in January last year.
This comes as a result of the downtrend experienced in the crypto and
traditional asset markets in 2022.

“In January 2023, average daily aggregate product volumes across all
digital asset investment products saw a decent recovery, rising 30.0% to
$72.5mn. Despite this, volumes are still 84.4% lower compared to January 2022
and 95.2% lower than the all-time high recorded in January 2021,” CryptoCompare
explained.

Watch the recent FMLS22 session on the crypto market structure.

According to data shared by CryptoCompare, Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust
(GBTC) continued to top the Bitcoin trust
market in January as its assets under management increased by 38.4%
to $14.5 billion month-over-month. GBTC is managed by Grayscale Investment, a digital asset manager and a subsidiary company of the Digital Currency Group (DCG).

Grayscale Investments’ bitcoin trust remains strong “despite the
uncertainty surrounding Genesis Trading,” CryptoCompare said. In mid-November, the crypto lender
Genesis Global Capital, which is owned by DCG, faced a ‘liquidity crunch’ and sought a $1 billion emergency loan. However, over two weeks ago two lending subsidiaries of the firm filed for bankruptcy protection before a Manhattan
court.

In addition, the crypto exchange Gemini is battling with Genesis over the payment of
a $900 million debt under the Gemini Earn programme. Moreover, three Gemini Earn
customers recently filed a class action arbitration request against Genesis for
allegedly failing to return Gemini Earn users’ assets. Compounding the situation, the US Securities and Exchange
Commission recently charged both Gemini and Genesis for
allegedly selling unregistered securities.

“Despite the growth in assets under management and trading volume, the
discount associated with Grayscale’s GBTC Trust has only slightly narrowed. The
situation remains delicate, as Grayscale faced challenges with the bankruptcy
announcement of its sister company Genesis due to exposure to FTX in January,
and the ongoing lawsuit against the SEC to convert its Bitcoin Trust into an
ETF,” CryptoCompare explained.

Source link

#Inflows #Crypto #Products #Highest #FTX #Collapse

Ethereum Rallies 10% as Crypto Market Improves, SOL, GALA, GALA, APT, Jan. 10



Source link

#Ethereum #Rallies #Crypto #Market #Improves #SOL #GALA #GALA #APT #Jan

These Crypto Founders And Bitcoin Moguls Lost $116 Billion In 2022

The embattled cryptocurrency industry and its wealthy pioneers face a moment of reckoning after the collapse of crypto exchange FTX and hedge fund Alameda Research

In January 2022, Sam Bankman-Fried was riding high. His Bahamas-based FTX had just raised $400 million from prominent venture capitalists at a $32 billion valuation. A few weeks later, when Forbes published its annual World’s Billionaires list, SBF, as he’s known, was crypto’s second-wealthiest person, worth $24 billion.

Now, Bankman-Fried is likely broke, and awaiting trial. Before he was arrested in the Bahamas, SBF told several media outlets his bank account was down to $100,000, and that he was “not sure” how he’ll pay his lawyers. Gary Wang, FTX’s other cofounder and the company’s former chief technology officer–who entered a plea deal with the Securities and Exchange Commission–has also seen his fortune, once estimated at $5.9 billion, wiped.

FTX’s demise was a fitting end to a year of wealth destruction in the cryptocurrency and blockchain sector. The post-pandemic economic shock, which triggered inflation and rising interest rates, sucked capital out of the speculative crypto ecosystem. Prominent firms imploded, from the $40 billion collapse in May of algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD, to the crypto hedge fund Three Arrows (which declared for bankruptcy in July), to the bankruptcies of interest-bearing lending businesses Voyager Digital, Celsius and BlockFi. Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency and an industry bellwether, is down 65% from its $69,000 peak in November 2021. Meanwhile some $2 trillion of market value has fled digital assets for safer pastures.

As a result, 17 of crypto’s wealthiest investors and founders have collectively lost an estimated $116 billion in personal wealth since March, according to Forbes’ estimates. Fifteen of them have lost more than half their fortune over the past nine months. Ten have lost their billionaire status altogether.

“We’re now at the breaking point in crypto where everyone will have to take a pause and say, ‘Okay, we’ve seen a ton of economic wealth destroyed in the last couple of months, we need to start taking this seriously,’” says Matt Cohen, founder of Ripple Ventures, a venture capital firm. “A lot of blockchain technologies and crypto companies built solutions for problems that didn’t need fixing, and I think we’re now going to have a hard reset.”

The man with the most to lose is Changpeng Zhao, CEO of Binance, crypto’s largest exchange, a sprawling global network of murky subsidiaries. CZ, as he’s known, has an estimated 70% stake in Binance, which Forbes’ values at $4.5 billion–down from $65 billion in March.

CZ helped set FTX’s demise in motion on November 6 when he tweeted that Binance would sell its remaining FTT, the native cryptocurrency of FTX. That triggered a run on FTX’s coffers as customers scrambled to withdraw their money, only to discover it was gone. FTX declared bankruptcy a few days later. Zhao prevailed over his rival, but now he must contend with the consequences. That could include the clawback in bankruptcy court of the over $2.1 billion that Binance made from selling its stake in FTX back to Bankman-Fried in the summer of 2021. (Zhao helped seed FTX in 2019.)

CZ also faces increased skepticism of centralized exchanges, particularly Binance, and ongoing investigations of him and his company by authorities in Europe and the United States over allegations of facilitating money laundering and other financial crimes. (Binance has denied wrongdoing.) In recent weeks, CZ has sought to reassure Binance users that their crypto deposits are fully backed, commissioning accounting firm Mazars to produce “proof of reserves” reports. These statements, which do not include liabilities, were widely criticized as insufficient for providing an incomplete snapshot of a company’s financial health. Mazars has since paused its work with crypto companies, adding to the uncertainty around Binance’s finances–and the exchange’s future.

“I don’t believe a business can persist, operating in this amorphous way, not governed by anyone or anywhere, especially when it’s run by a public individual,” says Lisa Ellis, an equity analyst at MoffettNathanson, a division of SVB Securities. Binance’s “dodgy operating model” would be a “non-starter for many investors, public or private,” adds Ellis.

CZ stated in a webinar on December 23 that Binance has zero liabilities: “We are quite a unique organization, we don’t have loans from any other organizations,” he said. “We will prove all the FUD [fear, uncertainty and doubt] is wrong.” A spokesperson for Binance said that Forbes’ estimate of CZ’s net worth “not an important metric for CZ. What’s more important is creating meaningful use cases for crypto.”

Barry Silbert, head of crypto conglomerate Digital Currency Group, is at the heart of crypto’s market contagion. One of DCG’s key assets, crypto lending unit Genesis Global Capital, owes creditors at least $1.8 billion, according to a source familiar with the matter (and as Reuters first reported). Additionally, DCG is saddled with debt. It assumed a $1.1 billion liability from Genesis, which stemmed from a bad loan Genesis had made to the now-bankrupt Three Arrows hedge fund. Separately, DCG owes Genesis another $575 million, which is due in May. DCG also owes $350 million to investment firm Elridge if Genesis goes under, the Financial Times reported.

To stay afloat, Silbert will likely have to raise outside capital or dismantle his DCG crypto empire, which includes some 200 investments in crypto firms and tokens, including crypto news site CoinDesk, bitcoin mining firm Foundry and Grayscale Investments, an asset management business that offers shares in a publicly traded Bitcoin trust. Forbes estimates the value of DCG’s outstanding liabilities are greater than the fair market value of its assets in the current market environment; DCG may also struggle to offload illiquid bets. For these reasons, Forbes estimates the current value of Silbert’s 40% stake in DCG to be approximately $0. Silbert’s personal investments could not be determined. A spokesperson for DCG declined to comment.

“They had a solvency issue at Genesis, which transformed into a liquidity issue. But those losses don’t disappear,” says Ram Ahluwalia, CEO of crypto-focused Lumida Wealth Management, who points out that Genesis creditors will have claims on DCG assets even if Genesis declares bankruptcy. “If DCG doesn’t raise fresh equity capital it will be perceived as a zombie business.”

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, the bitcoin billionaires immortalized in The Social Network for their role in Facebook’s founding, are also caught in Silbert’s lending web. Gemini, the twins’ privately held crypto exchange, offered their users returns as high as 8% during the bull market through their Gemini Earn product, which outsourced the loanmaking to Genesis; now Gemini customers are owed some $900 million by Genesis. On November 16, Genesis suspended withdrawals, leaving customers outraged. Gemini Dollar, the exchange’s stablecoin and a key component of Gemini Earn’s lending program, has experienced large outflows. The Winklevii have remained quiet, apart from sparsely worded Twitter updates about Gemini forming a creditor committee.

For Brian Armstrong, who is the CEO of publicly traded exchange Coinbase, FTX’s collapse presented an opportunity to strike. On November 8, in the chaotic hours after Binance announced its tentative takeover of FTX, Armstrong trumpeted his vision for crypto while dissing Binance’s Zhao. “Coinbase and Binance are following different approaches. We’re trying to follow a regulated, trusted approach,” Armstrong said on the Bankless podcast. “To look at it intellectually honestly, we’re choosing to follow the rules. It’s a more difficult path and sometimes your hands are tied, but I think that’s the right long-term strategy.” In a 13-tweet thread that same day, Armstrong reiterated those themes.

Investors don’t seem to care. Coinbase’s stock is down 64% since August and more than 95% from its $100 billion IPO in April 2021, wiping out much of Armstrong’s fortune.

Meanwhile, Coinbase’s other cofounder, Fred Ehrsam, got burned by Bankman-Fried. His crypto venture firm Paradigm invested $278 million in FTX equity. Ehrsam has not issued any public statements about the investment. Matt Huang, Ehrsam’s partner at Paradigm, said on Twitter: “We feel deep regret for having invested in a founder and company who ultimately did not align with crypto’s values and who have done enormous damage to the ecosystem,” adding that Paradigm’s equity investment in FTX “constituted a small part of our total assets” and that Paradigm had never entrusted FTX to hold any of its digital asset investments.

Private crypto firms that raised capital in 2021 or earlier this year at high valuations are being traded at significant markdowns on secondary markets and in over-the-counter deals, says Matt Cohen of Ripple Ventures, who expects to see larger markdowns for the fourth quarter as companies prepare year-end investor reports. “Q4 audit season is going to be the time when the rubber meets the road on what funds are going to be marked down properly,” he says.

For example, shares of NFT exchange OpenSea are trading at a 75% discount since January, when OpenSea hit a $13.3 billion valuation, according to data from private market data platforms ApeVue and Caplight. Daily trading volumes on OpenSea’s NFT exchange have been under $10 million in the last month, compared to over $200 million back in January, according to crypto site DappRadar. OpenSea’s 30-something cofounders, Devin Finzer and Alex Atallahh, are no longer billionaires.

Nikil Viswanathan and Joe Lau, the founders of Alchemy, a crypto software firm that powers other Web3 ventures, have also departed the three-comma club, based on estimated markdowns of their stakes in Alchemy, which last raised outside capital in February at a $10.2 billion valuation. According to Viswanathan, FTX’s collapse “hurts the consumer perception of the [crypto] space. We’ve seen this play out in the Lehman Brothers and Bernie Madoff collapses in 2008 — it takes time to recover.” Alchemy, however, has continued growing throughout the bear market, says Viswanathan. “The difference is in Web3 we’ve seen developer activity accelerate during even the most tumultuous times, which points to an incredibly strong, mission-driven community of builders.”

Jed McCaleb, cofounder of crypto firm Ripple, is believed to be the only person who made their fortune in crypto to have retained most of his fortune through the downturn. But that’s because he sold out almost entirely before the crash. McCaleb offloaded some $2.5 billion worth of XRP, Ripple’s native token, between December 2020 and July 2022, fulfilling the separation agreement he signed with Ripple’s other founders back in 2013. Today, XRP trades around $0.40 per coin, down around 50% from earlier this year, when McCaleb was dumping millions of dollars’ worth of XRP tokens each week.

Chris Larsen, Ripple’s other founder and its chairman, has lost over $2 billion this year, due to XRP’s declining price and Forbes’ estimated discount on Ripple’s equity valuation. Ripple, which last raised capital in 2019 at a $10 billion valuation, bought back shares from an investor last year at an inflated $15 billion valuation after that investor had sued Ripple in connection with a Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit filed against Ripple in December 2020; that case is still working its way through courts.

Tim Draper, a venture capitalist who holds around 30,000 bitcoins, dropped from the billionaire ranks earlier this year, when Bitcoin hit $33,000. As ever though, Draper remains optimistic about bitcoin’s future, even though his oft-repeated $250,000 price target looks more fanciful by the day. “I suspect that this is the beginning of the end of the centralized tokens,” Draper tells Forbes. “If a token is centralized, you’re at the mercy of the person who controls the currency. And that was definitely the case with FTX.”



Source link

#Crypto #Founders #Bitcoin #Moguls #Lost #Billion

The Disappearing Act of Nishad Singh, FTX Billionaire

Nishad Singh served on the board of the firm’s philanthropic arm. (File)

The rallying cry of the scorned crypto faithful, which started when FTX spiraled into bankruptcy, has taken on added seriousness after Sam Bankman-Fried was arrested in the Bahamas and charged with eight criminal counts in the US.

“Where is Gary Wang?”

Wang, an ex-Google software engineer, had established a reputation – both internally and outside the firm – as a quiet fixer and the brains behind the FTX crypto empire. Media-shy and prone to work odd hours, the exchange’s co-founder cultivated an aura of mystery that served as a stark contrast to the more high-profile Bankman-Fried.

Wang, like Bankman-Fried, was also once one of the richest twentysomethings on the planet – with a stake in the business worth as much as $1.6 billion in March, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

He’s still in the Bahamas, according to a person familiar with the matter. And, as Bankman-Fried would tell Vox: “Gary is scared.”

Bankman-Fried’s arrest, made at the request of the US government, underscores the urgency among authorities to crack down on one of the crypto industry’s biggest implosions, which has left some 1 million customers in limbo. Though Bankman-Fried served as the public face of FTX, it was a tight-knit inner circle – him, Wang, Caroline Ellison and Nishad Singh – who are said to have been aware of the decision to use FTX customer money to help Alameda meet its debts. That decision ultimately doomed FTX and strikes at the heart of whether they committed fraud.

Neither Wang nor Singh, both of whom were fired a week after FTX’s bankruptcy, has surfaced in the month after the epic collapse – nor have they been charged. It’s not clear whether either have lawyered up, in contrast with Ellison, who hired Stephanie Avakian, former enforcement division chief at the Securities and Exchange Commission, along with others at WilmerHale.

In the case of Singh, the 27-year-old director of engineering who grew up in California, it’s not even known where he’s currently holed up.

The disappearance act is a departure from the outsized roles they played at FTX, especially as Bankman-Fried became a more public figure advocating for pandemic preparedness and regulatory changes.

“FTX Group’s collapse appears to stem from the absolute concentration of control in the hands of a very small group of grossly inexperienced and unsophisticated individuals,” John J. Ray III, FTX’s newly appointed chief executive officer, said in prepared remarks to the House Financial Services Committee this week.

Bankman-Fried was charged with criminal counts including conspiracy and wire fraud in an indictment unsealed by a federal court judge in Manhattan Tuesday. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed a complaint Tuesday, in which Bankman-Fried was the only listed individual defendant. The Securities and Exchange Commission also targeted just Bankman-Fried.

Wang didn’t respond to phone calls, emails and text messages seeking comment. Singh didn’t respond to emails and Telegram messages requesting comment.

Where’s Gary?

While “Where is Gary Wang?” has become a frequent question on Twitter and Reddit message boards in the wake of FTX’s collapse, it was also what some inside the firm were asking during the chaotic days before the exchange went bust.

Rather than looking to Bankman-Fried’s Twitter ramblings for solace, some employees instead sought reassurance from the actions of Wang and particularly Singh, who was known as an attentive manager.

But, in an ominous sign of what was to come, they were nowhere to be found.

On a Slack channel for urgent engineering issues, messages that would normally get a response in a matter of minutes would go unanswered for a day, according to a person familiar with the matter. As FTX’s general counsel, Ryne Miller, pleaded for Bankman-Fried and other founders to cooperate, Wang would barely respond, according to internal discussions seen by Bloomberg.

“Gary is scared, Nishad is ashamed and guilty,” Bankman-Fried would tell Vox less than a week later, in a conversation he claims wasn’t meant to be public. His biggest mistake, he insisted, was filing for bankruptcy at all.

Perhaps his best shot to fix what he’d done? “Either Gary or Nishad comes back,” he said.

They didn’t. Now Bankman-Fried is being held in custody pending an extradition process, the Bahamas attorney general, Ryan Pinder, said on Monday. The SEC on Tuesday accused him of carrying out a multi-year scheme to defraud investors, with Chair Gary Gensler calling his crypto empire “a house of cards on a foundation of deception.”

Brilliant Coder

Bankman-Fried and Wang, who met at math camp in high school and were roommates at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, remained close at FTX. At one point, after Bankman-Fried hadn’t been seen in the office for a while, he returned and explained to employees that he’d been absent because he just wanted to work alongside Wang, who, unlike him, could code, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Wang is brilliant “beyond belief,” Singh, who was mentored by him and worked with him in Hong Kong on the development of FTX’s exchange, said in a 2020 podcast. A now-deleted blog post celebrating FTX’s first anniversary features a photo of Wang reclined with his feet on his desk, sporting a fleece and jeans in front of six large computer screens.

It’s one of the few pictures available of Wang. He had the second-largest position in FTX.US behind Bankman-Fried, according to court documents, and also the second-biggest stake in Alameda, with about 10 per cent. He also borrowed $224.7 million from the trading house, according to the complaint filed by the SEC.

Bankman-Fried and Wang controlled access to FTX’s digital assets, according to a document filed by Ray. He said the company’s “unacceptable management practices” included the use of software to conceal the misuse of customer funds.

Bankman-Fried disputed that he, Ellison, Singh and Wang decided to use FTX customer funds to cover Alameda’s shortfall, which, if true, could mean they committed fraud. He said the executives held a meeting about whether to extend more credit to Alameda – though the distinction is hard to parse.

“That was the point at which Alameda’s margin position on FTX got, well, it got more leveraged substantially,” Bankman-Fried said in an interview with Bloomberg. “Obviously, in retrospect, we should’ve just said no.”

Kindness King

Other than Bankman-Fried, Wang didn’t seem to have many friends at the company, according to a person familiar with the matter. Singh, a high school friend of Bankman-Fried’s brother who overcame asthma to set a world record for the fastest 100-mile run by a 16-year-old, was more social and well-liked by his colleagues.

“In addition to building out much of our technological infrastructure and managing most of our dev team, his treatment of employees has earned him sole membership in our Slack group ‘Kings of Kindness,'” Bankman-Fried wrote in the FTX blog post.

Singh held a 7.83 per cent stake in the business silo that included FTX.US, which was worth about $572 million in March 2022, and received a $543 million loan from Alameda, according to bankruptcy documents. He was likely one of the five co-workers that Bankman-Fried pegged as a billionaire when asked earlier this year.

Singh had said working at the firms allowed him to make more money to give away – a tenet of the effective altruism movement – and that he was considering working for a charity in the future to “do the right thing” to make the world better.

“Currently, I’m sort of lucky that I can get fulfilled in many ways at this job – one of which is doing something that’s probably pretty good from an effective altruist perspective,” he said in a 2020 podcast.

A former FTX employee said it was shocking to see Singh, who served on the board of the firm’s philanthropic arm, at the center of the implosion. Another described their feelings as more heartbroken than angry that Singh reportedly knew customers funds were used to bail out Alameda.

FTX’s collapse “hit him hard,” Bankman-Fried said of Singh in his Vox interview.

“I mean it hit all of us hard,” he said. “But it hit him HARD.”

If Singh were ashamed and guilty, as Bankman-Fried put it, there are few signs he sought to make amends so far as FTX’s bankruptcy unfolds.

“We had no cooperation of the founders in preparing,” Ryne Miller, FTX’s general counsel, said in response to an issue raised with the company’s bankruptcy process last month, according to internal chat logs. “It was unfortunate.”

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Featured Video Of The Day

Watch: Raghuram Rajan Joins Rahul Gandhi During ‘Bharat Jodo Yatra’

Source link

#Disappearing #Act #Nishad #Singh #FTX #Billionaire

The Crypto Contagion Intensifies With More Dominoes To Fall


The below is an excerpt from a recent edition of Bitcoin Magazine Pro, Bitcoin Magazine’s premium markets newsletter. To be among the first to receive these insights and other on-chain bitcoin market analysis straight to your inbox, subscribe now.

We’re currently in the middle of the industry contagion and market panic taking shape. Although FTX and Alameda have fallen, many more players across funds, market makers, exchanges, miners and other businesses will follow suit. This is a similar playbook to what we’ve seen before in the previous crash sparked by Luna, except that this one will be more impactful to the market. This is the proper cleansing and washout from the misallocation of capital, speculation and excessive leverage that come with the global economic liquidity tide going back out.



Source link