Exclusive: Lukas Walton’s Builders Vision Reveals How It’s Deployed $3 Billion To Change The World

For the first time, the group founded by the Walmart heir details how it’s used investing, philanthropy and advocacy to further its lofty goals of environmental and societal transformation.

L ukas Walton’s Builders Vision, a giant in the world of impact investing, revealed for the first time Tuesday in a 57-page report how it had deployed $3 billion to slow climate change, promote sustainable farming and heal the world’s oceans, among other lofty goals.

The organization founded by the 37-year-old Walmart heir delivered a sobering message: as much as we’re trying, we can’t do it alone.

“We have a lot of capital to deploy, but these are trillion-dollar issues,” Builders Vision president Matt Knott told Forbes. “Even if we’re wildly successful in our own right, it wouldn’t be nearly enough. We need to get other investors and philanthropists to join us and dive into these transitions.”

Walton established Builders Vision as an umbrella for his philanthropic, investment and advocacy work in 2021. Today, the group’s assets include $2 billion in philanthropy, $2.05 billion in its investment arm S2G Ventures, and billions more (the group won’t specify the exact amount) in its asset-management firm, Builders Asset Management. To date, Builders Vision has invested in, financed or partnered with nearly 450 startups and organizations focused on environmental and societal change.

Among the achievements spotlighted in the report: the development of more than 170 sustainable products and technologies; the creation of over 42,000 jobs; the installation of 15,685 megawatts of renewable energy capacity, enough to power the states of Iowa and Michigan; and the mitigation, sequestration or avoidance of more than 4 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, equal to about 870,000 passenger cars.

Walton, a grandson of Walmart founder Sam Walton who inherited a fortune when his father John died in a 2005 plane crash, is worth $23.7 billion, according to Forbes. He has long focused on sustainability and environmental advocacy, and is the environment program committee chair at the Walton Family Foundation. He declined to speak with Forbes for this story, but explained his philosophy in a video that Builders Vision is releasing this morning. “I see a future in which there’s a realization of the ramifications of our decisions,” he said, “but that we have both the power and the opportunity and that we can realize alternative choices that we would be proud to share with our children.”

“Even if we’re wildly successful in our own right, it wouldn’t be nearly enough. We need to get other investors and philanthropists to join us.”

Matt Knott, Builders Vision president

For the past year, Builders Vision, which calls itself an impact platform, has been working to detail the influences of its work, bringing together data from its portfolio companies and other partners from January 2020 to June 2023. Its largest focus is energy, with $1.8 billion in funding commitments. Builders Vision has also committed $1 billion to food and agriculture, and $260 million to healthier oceans.

The group has not disclosed financial returns. Rebecca Carland, Builders Asset Management’s chief investment officer, told Forbes by email that its public ESG equity managers have “collectively outperformed the global equity index by over 200 basis points annualized over the past decade,” while its impact venture capital managers are outperforming traditional VC benchmarks by “a wide margin.” A basis point is 0.01 of a percentage point; 200 basis points are 2 percentage points.

Builders Vision is trying to convince family offices and venture investors to follow its lead. Bill Gates’ Breakthrough Energy and Pierre Omidyar’s Omidyar Network have similarly been set up to use impact investments to tackle global problems.

Builders Vision’s direct investments run the gamut from U.K. microplastics filtration firm Matter to Kansas City, Kansas-based electric terminal-truck maker Orange EV. It counts a total of 166 partners in food and agriculture, 125 in energy and 158 in oceans.

“If you can find the right purpose-driven investments that are addressing real problems in the world, they’re going to be attractive investment opportunities,” said Knott, who previously was president of Feeding America and an executive at PepsiCo. Revealing the platform’s impact in its report, he said, “was important for us and we believe it will be important to catalyze resources into these issues from other organizations.”


Organic Farming

Food and agriculture has been an area close to Walton’s heart. When he was three, he was diagnosed with a rare form of cancer, and after he failed to respond to chemotherapy his mother put him on an all-natural diet, a shift he believes contributed to his recovery.

In the report, Builders Vision said that it had mitigated, avoided or sequestered more than 3.1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide — the equivalent of 683,761 passenger cars — from its work in food and agriculture. It also developed at least 114 products or technologies that promote the production and consumption of healthy food, and it sustainably manages 2.6 million acres of land.

Among the group’s investments: Omaha-based Clear Frontier, which helps farmers transition from conventional methods to organic. Justin Bruch, a fifth-generation farmer from Iowa who holds an MBA from California State University, Fresno set up the firm in early 2019 after he made the switch himself.

Clear Frontier buys up farms that could go organic, then leases them to local farmers who’ve already farmed organically or want to learn how. A big stumbling block, he said, is that farmers are required to spend three years with no synthetics on their farmland to meet the requirements of the USDA’s organic program, yet farmland is generally rented on one-year leases. “No one wants to start a 36-month process and be a year into it and maybe the farm gets sold or rented to someone who pays a higher amount,” he said. “We’re trying to facilitate being the landlord who’s there for the long haul.”

Clear Frontier has more than 15,000 acres in Nebraska, Colorado and Texas, 30% of which is now certified organic with the remainder in transition.


Clean Energy

Builders Vision’s largest dollar commitment is in clean energy. While the majority of funding has gone through fund managers, it has also invested directly in companies such as Electric Hydrogen, which has developed technology to produce green hydrogen, and Brimstone, which makes clean cement.

“Capital formation in the energy sector has been developing more rapidly,” Knott said. But while investors have flocked to the space, he said, there remain areas that haven’t received much funding. “We try to fund those white spaces,” he said.

The group focuses its venture investments on technologies that are ready to scale up, but where entrepreneurs may need help with commercialization or financing. At S2G, Builders Vision’s venture fund, “there’s a pragmatic focus on the next 10 to 15 years, and focusing on opportunities that can deliver big impact then,” said Frank O’Sullivan, S2G Ventures’ managing director, who oversees clean energy investments.

Of the $3 billion that Builders Vision has deployed to date, some 60% has gone to energy.

O’Sullivan pointed, for example, to the use of green hydrogen in the production of steel and ammonia, an area where Electric Hydrogen operates. “Even though it’s technically possible to produce green hydrogen and put it in an ammonia facility, those ammonia manufacturers aren’t able to say, ‘I’ll sign a 20-year, fixed-price agreement with you to have fixed-price hydrogen.’ That’s not their business model,” O’Sullivan said. “That misalignment between business models is an enormous friction point to making progress.”

In addition to installing 15,685 megawatts of renewable energy capacity last year, the group said it created nearly 26,000 new jobs in clean energy.


Healthy Oceans

Tackling problems such as overfishing, the proliferation of microplastics and the extinction of marine species has largely been the work of charitable enterprises. Businesses set up to help oceans have been rare. “The idea was how do we bring innovation and business development into what has largely been a philanthropic space for oceans,” said Peter Bryant, program director of the oceans program at Builders Vision’s Builders Initiative division, who previously worked with Walton on environmental issues at the Walton Family Foundation.

Among the 31 companies focused on improving ocean resilience that have received backing are Atlantic Sea Farms, which produces locally harvested sustainable seaweed; Coral Vita, which uses a process called micro-fragmentation to restore coral reefs; and Moleaer, which cleans water with nanobubbles. It has also worked with the Port of San Diego to improve the shore’s resilience, including by launching 360 artificial reef balls made up of local sediment and oyster shells to prevent erosion.

Providing funds for companies that can scale up their technologies is a major focus. Moleaer, for example, developed a generator to make its microscopic bubbles, which can remain suspended in water for a long period of time, for use in industry. Its technology can be used to replace chemicals that kill algae in water treatment, provide alternatives to chlorine to wash fruit, and even in mines to more efficiently extract copper, a necessary material for electric vehicles. “It’s all about what these bubbles can do,” said Nick Dyner, the company’s CEO. Since 2016, the Carson, California-based startup has deployed nearly 2,500 nanobubble generators worldwide.

Since focusing on oceans, Builders Vision has worked to protect or restore 1.96 million hectares of marine and coastal habitats, roughly 33 times the size of Chicago; avoided, mitigated or sequestered 876,928 metric tons of carbon dioxide; and produced 18,124 tons of seafood, seaweed and other biomass in a sustainable way, nearly the annual seafood consumption of 1,000 people, according to its report.


Measuring Impact

Tracking financial returns is one thing. Quantifying impact is much tougher. What even counts as success? “We know there’s no silver bullet here, and we’re just hoping to add to the evidence base,” said Joanna Cohen, Builders Vision’s head of impact measurement and management.

While Walton’s wealth makes Builders Vision one of the largest impact investors in the world, the group hopes to become bigger still, in terms of both dollars and influence. “I won’t give specific numbers, but I think it can be multiples of what we’re investing today,” Knott said. “And more importantly, I think we can attract multiples of that by having other investors join us on this journey.”

Source link

#Exclusive #Lukas #Waltons #Builders #Vision #Reveals #Deployed #Billion #Change #World

EPA Gonna Punch That Climate Emergency Right In The Snoot!

The Biden administration rolled out yet another piece of its climate plan today, as the Environmental Protection Agency proposed new regulations to limit the greenhouse gases emitted by electric power plants fueled by coal and methane (so-called “natural” gas). As the New York Times puts it in an admirably simple and accurate sentence,

The nation’s 3,400 coal- and gas-fired power plants currently generate about 25 percent of greenhouse gases produced by the United States, pollution that is dangerously heating the planet.

Instead of mandating any particular technology, the rules set caps on rates of carbon dioxide pollution that plants can release, leaving it up to energy producers to find ways to meet the goal of eliminating CO2 emissions by 2040. If industry can find ways to capture all CO2 from smokestacks — technology that doesn’t exist yet — then great. But it’s more likely that utilities would have to switch to green energy, or for gas plants, to burning green hydrogen (the kind produced without fossil fuels), which emits no carbon.

And while the EPA doesn’t say it, we’re happy to: The faster the US and the world adopt solar and wind electricity, the cheaper that electricity will be per megawatt hour. According to an Oxford University study published in September, a rapid transition away from fossil fuels to wind and solar could save the world $12 trillion by 2050, which would help offset other costs of the transition like grid upgrades and developing reliable storage/backup/distribution of clean energy. Going slow, on the other hand, will cost more and result in greater climate caused damage.


The EPA press release says the regulations will

avoid up to 617 million metric tons of total carbon dioxide (CO2) through 2042, which is equivalent to reducing the annual emissions of 137 million passenger vehicles, roughly half the cars in the United States. Through 2042, EPA estimates the net climate and health benefits of the standards on new gas and existing coal-fired power plants are up to $85 billion.

The EPA emphasizes the public health benefits of not burning all that stuff, which doesn’t just contribute to global warming but releases nasties like particulates, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides into the air Americans breathe, especially in communities nearest to power plants, which tend to be home to poor and minority people because America. In addition to helping to keep the planet more habitable for large mammals like gazelles and the NCAA Final Four champion men’s and women’s teams, the proposed standards would mean huge health gains. In 2030 alone, the EPA says, cleaner air resulting from the new standards would prevent

• approximately 1,300 premature deaths;

• more than 800 hospital and emergency room visits;

• more than 300,000 cases of asthma attacks;

• 38,000 school absence days; [and]

• 66,000 lost workdays.

Under the new rules, virtually all coal and methane gas plants would be required to either reduce or capture 90 percent of their carbon emissions by 2038, or shut down. Currently, roughly a quarter of American coal plants are already scheduled to be retired by 2029, per the US Energy Information Agency.

Needless to say, industry groups and Republican state officials are at this very moment working on the first drafts of legal challenges to the policy, written as is traditional with the congealed blood of seals and dolphins killed by oil spills. The Times reports that West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey (R) is already declaring the EPA plan DOA in the courts, whining that “It is not going to be upheld, and it just seems designed to scare more coal-fired power plants into retirement — the goal of the Biden administration.” Stupid not-wanting-climate-catastrophe Biden!

Sen. Joe Manchin (“D”-West Virginia), whose family fortune is built on selling some of the filthiest coal available — a mining waste slurry called “gob” coal that’s particularly carbon intensive — also threatened today that he will oppose any new Biden appointees to the EPA unless the plan is dropped. Manchin griped that the administration is

“determined to advance its radical climate agenda and has made it clear they are hellbent on doing everything in their power to regulate coal- and gas-fueled power plants out of existence, no matter the cost to energy security and reliability.”

Also, fuck the future, the man has money at stake, and he hasn’t spent a career lining his own nest with filthy feathers from crows with black lung disease just to watch it all go away because people in the tropical regions think they “deserve” to live.

So yeah, kids, this is going to be a fight between the wealthy bastards who want to keep pumping the atmosphere full of planet-heating pollutants, and the first president ever whose administration is actually taking the action needed to get close to meeting the US’s commitments to decarbonization by midcentury, which all nations need to do in order to hold warming to non-catastrophic levels.

Previously:

When you combine the anticipated greenhouse gas reductions from the EPA’s recent vehicle emissions standards, its methane reduction standards, and the power plant emissions standards announced today, the Times reports, the total emissions that would be eliminated would be around 15 billion tons of CO2 by 2055, or

roughly the amount of pollution generated by the entire United States economy over three years. Several analyses have projected that the Inflation Reduction Act will cut emissions by at least another billion tons by 2030.

That could put the nation on track to meet Mr. Biden’s pledge that the United States would cut its greenhouse gases in half by 2030 and stop adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere altogether by 2050, although analysts point out that more policies will need to be enacted to reach the latter target.

And that, children, puts the world within what I’ll call realistic hoping distance of actually meeting the Paris Climate Agreement goal of limiting warming since the start of the industrial age to 1.5 degrees C (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit). It would require all countries doing the same as or better than the Biden plan is close to accomplishing, so yeah, that’s freaking difficult. But doable, genuinely doable, according to the climate boffins. The Times again:

“Each of these several regulations from the E.P.A. are contributing to the whole picture that is necessary to steer this ocean liner away from the worst climate disaster,” said Dallas Burtraw, an economist with Resources for the Future, a nonpartisan research organization that focuses on energy and environmental policy.

Also I just remembered that we were going to do some kind of Wonkette Book Club on Kim Stanley Robinson’s 2020 climate novel The Ministry for the Future (Wonkette-gets-a-cut link), so I guess I’d better actually make a plan and write it up for tomorrow, damn my eyes.

Let’s choose hope. But back it up with action.

OPEN THREAD.

[EPA / NYT / Oxford University / AP / NBC News / Photo: American Wind Energy Association, used by permission]

Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. If you can, please give $5 or $10 a month to help us keep this mommyblog going! If you’re shopping at Amazon anyhow, here’s a link that will help out Yr. Wonkette with a portion of sales.

Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.



Source link

#EPA #Gonna #Punch #Climate #Emergency #Snoot

Joe Biden’s 2024 Menu: The Rich.

President Joe Biden on Thursday rolled out his proposed budget for fiscal 2024, an ambitious plan that would raise taxes on the rich and on corporations while expanding the social safety net. It would cut nearly $3 trillion from the federal deficit over the next decade by imposing a 25 percent minimum tax on the richest Americans. If you want to read the entire 185-page document, have at it!

Of course, it also won’t do a single bit of that, because Republicans won’t pass any of the major parts of the plan, particularly not the tax increases, but also not the social safety net parts like paid family leave, childcare, or Biden’s plan to rescue the Medicare trust fund for at least 25 years.

Not a bit of it will become law except the most routine keep-things-as-they-are parts, which will no doubt end up in yet another omnibus spending bill passed barely in time to avoid a government shutdown. If then. Oh, also, the part that increases defense spending by about 3.2 percent, to over $835 billion, will probably do just fine. But whatever defense budget eventually passes in the fall won’t be accompanied by the tax increases that would make the expenditures slightly less odious.


So why even offer a budget that’s not going to get passed by Congress? For starters, presidents have to submit a budget request in early February (traditionally by the first Monday, but everything moves slow these days) to get the process rolling, and the budget reflects the administration’s priorities, even if the opposition is able to block them. Also, let’s remember that Donald Trump’s budgets, which zeroed out entire federal agencies, were entirely exercises in rightwing fantasy. And yet somehow we still have the National Endowment for the Arts.

So sure, a federal budget is mostly aspirational, and this year, Biden’s budget serves two practical purposes: It sets out markers for where he wants his government to go in a second term (you know, if he runs), and it’s also an opening bid in the negotiations over raising the debt ceiling. Republicans say they want to cut federal spending because the deficits are too high, and Biden’s budget is over here saying “Yeah? You show me how you’d reduce the deficit by $3 trillion in 10 years, ya mooks.”

Former Obama administration official Kenneth Baer, who served in the Office of Management and Budget, explained to the Washington Post,

“As one of the people who has spent many a long night writing and editing a budget, I take umbrage at the people who say it’s a meaningless document. It’s not a meaningless document. […] It sets the terms of the debate. It shows what’s important to you, your commitments and what you really want.”

So let’s take a look at what’s in this thing and what that says about what Joe Biden wants.

The Rich Still Need To Be Eaten

Speaking at a union hall in Philadelphia yesterday, Biden emphasized that his third budget proposal is aimed at “investing in America and all of America,” because “Too many people have been left behind and treated like they’re invisible. Not anymore. I promise I see you.”

To that end, the $6.8 trillion budget plan (over 10 years) includes about $5 trillion in tax increases on the wealthiest individuals and corporations, most of which will go to cover new programs that Biden has previously put forward but that haven’t yet been enacted.

Some specific tax increase proposals may sound familiar because some of them were in the original version of Build Back Better, but were removed after Sen. Kyrsten Sinema said Donald Trump’s 2017 Big Fat Tax Cuts for Rich Fuckwads couldn’t be reversed, not even a little.

  • Raise the corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent, which would still be lower than the 35 percent rate prior to Trump’s 2017 cuts. It would also raise the tax rate on foreign earnings from 10.5 percent to 21 percent, to reduce the incentive for companies to move operations out of the USA.
  • Repeal Trump’s tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans by returning the top marginal tax rate to 39.7 percent from the current 37 percent. This would affect taxpayers making $400,000 a year for individuals, or $450,000 married filing jointly.
  • Tax capital gains the same as income for people making over $1 million, and close the carried interest loopholefor chrissakes finally.
  • Increase the surtax on corporate stock buybacks from one percent to four percent
  • A new minimum tax on billionaires, assessing a 25 percent minimum tax on all income of the wealthiest tenth of one percent of Americans. That’s a follow-up to the minimum corporate tax that was included in last year’s Inflation Reduction Act.
  • Raise Medicare taxes on those making more than $400,000 a year, and make more types of income eligible for Medicare taxation. We detailed that plan right here. Medicare would also be able to negotiate prices on more prescription drugs sooner, creating additional savings that would go to the Medicare trust fund.

Nice Things We Need

The budget also includes some domestic programs that were good ideas when they were proposed in Build Back Better, and were still good ideas when Joe Manchin demanded they be removed from Build Back Better. A few have been downsized for the budget plan, which also adds some items that weren’t in BBB.

  • Restore the enhanced child tax credit and make it permanent. Hell yes. It markedly reduced child poverty in the US, and it’s damn near criminal that it was allowed to lapse. Also way better for America’s children than allowing them to work in meatpacking plants.
  • College affordability. The budget calls for higher maximum awards for Pell grants and for a $500 million grant program to make two years of community college free — not quite the full free community college program Biden originally ran on.
  • Universal Pre-K and affordable child care. Not quite the full programs proposed in Build Back Better, but as CNN summarizes, this would fund “a new federal-state partnership program that would provide universal, free preschool. The spending plan would also increase funding for existing federal early care and education programs.”
  • Paid family and medical leave — another big priority that still needs doing. 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave; for fuckssake let’s get this done. Yeah, in 2025 after we retake the House and expand the Senate majority.
  • More free school meals. During the pandemic, we gave every kid eat. The Biden budget would provide $15 billion to enable wider free lunches, though hey, since it’s a wish list, why not just say we want universal free school lunch? Kids learn better if they’re not hungry.
  • Make the IRA’s Obamacare subsidies permanent. The enhanced premium subsidies, which started out as part of the American Rescue Plan, have helped reduce the percentage of Americans without healthcare coverage to record lows. But they’re set to expire in 2025.
  • Reduce maternal mortality. It’s still a crisis, with far greater rates of maternal mortality for Black women than for white women. The budget calls for $471 million in funding to expand maternal health care, particularly in rural areas. It would also require all states to provide Medicaid postpartum care for 12 months instead of the current 60 days.
  • $35 per month insulin for all Americans. It was included in the IRA for folks on Social Security, so let’s make that the standard for those on private insurance or who have no insurance at all. It’s literally a matter of life or death.
  • Lower prescription drug prices for seniors. The IRA put a $2000 cap annual on out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries (going into effect in 2025). Biden wants to further limit copays for generic prescription drugs for chronic conditions to $2.

Yes, We Still Need Climate Spending

While the Inflation Reduction Act was the biggest American investment ever in fighting the climate emergency, Biden’s budget proposal also recognizes that there’s a lot more that needs doing, so it calls for still more funding to move America closer to reaching our Paris climate agreement goals. We want to wrap this sucker up, but take a look at this CNBC piece for more details on how the budget would expand our transition to clean power and cutting carbon emissions. Among the basics:

$24 billion for climate resilience and conservation

$16.5 billion for climate science and clean energy innovation

$6.5 billion for energy storage and transmission projects

$4.5 billion for jobs building clean energy infrastructure

$3 billion for advancing adaptation finance

$1.8 billion for environmental justice initiatives

$1.2 billion for the Energy Department’s industrial decarbonization activities

Want even more info? I’m leaving a tab open with the White House fact sheet on the budget’s climate priorities, because this is what the agenda for keeping the planet habitable should look like.

So those are some darn good priorities — and a blueprint for the 2024 campaign, too.

And now, back to two years of hearings on Twitter and Hunter’s laptop. Total waste of time, but they may help make a very strong case for not letting Republicans anywhere near power again.

[2024 Budget of the US Government / WaPo / CNBC / NYT / CNBC]

Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. If you can, please give $5 or $10 monthly so we can keep bringing you all the reasons we need to keep at this.

Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.



Source link

#Joe #Bidens #Menu #Rich